- Post
- #404896
- Topic
- Adywan's ESB edit: Suggestion Terminal
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/404896/action/topic#404896
- Time
46th post
Reserved for future updates.
46th post
Reserved for future updates.
45th post
Reserved for future updates.
44th post
Reserved for future updates.
43rd post
Reserved for future updates.
42nd post
Reserved for future updates.
41st post
Reserved for future updates.
41st post
Reserved for future updates.
40th post
Reserved for future updates.
39th post
Reserved for future updates.
38th post
Reserved for future updates.
37th post
Reserved for future updates.
36th post
Reserved for future updates.
35th post
Reserved for future updates.
34th post
Reserved for future updates.
33rd post
Reserved for future updates.
32nd post
Reserved for future updates.
31st post
Reserved for future updates.
30th post
Reserved for future updates.
29th post
Reserved for future updates.
28th post
Reserved for future updates.
27th post
Reserved for future updates.
26th post
Reserved for future updates.
The thing that was offputting in that io9 interview, is that the makers chose to highlight this particular trivial adywan amendment in the first place....rather than any of the more obviously appreciated ones that addressed some of the more dubious/controversial SE 'creative choices' that GL made!
Such as making Han shoot Greedo first once again for instance, along with improving the shoddy colour and sound treatment of the 2004 dvd release, never mind fixing numerous continuity and optical mistakes that went untouched before, that many fans would have been delighted to see attended to.
Now THOSE, I would have preferred to have been acknowledged.
At least the site itself (which is a good one), embedded a decent example of adywan's amazing efforts, thankfully.
vote_for_palpatine, the fact that they used the words 'The people vs' is the problem.
The makers have stated that there were some very interesting persons that were keen in participating too, but that had to rule themselves out due to the implication that 'everyone' in the documentary was 'against' GL....
I'm sure that with a little effort, that they could have come up with a slightly less inflammatory-sounding title (albeit they themselves looked on it as 'tongue-in-cheek') that would have been as equally attention-grabbing, but unlike yours, without the snark.
Maybe any additional links concerning that new documentary can be added to this particular thread about it from hereon. I'm sure there'll be plenty more comments to come about it on there too, and I've added my own early thoughts - http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-People-Vs-George-Lucas-documentary/topic/8902/