Sure, that could work. The cropping difference is not that huge I think - it probably wouldn’t be much more of a difference than the Technicolor prints vs. Eastman of Star Wars.
It’s not going to be 1:1 but the general look should be similar to v2.0.
I made those tracks for Despecialized mixing the commentaries with the 1993 stereo tracks.
This is really cool! Thanks for making this. Also, thanks for pointing to my video on not selling and buying fanedits.
And some recomposited shots that were only done in 2004, like the imperial fleet introduction.
Hello Harmy, I don’t know if it’s too late to ask this, but if you end up doing a ROTJ 3.2, and when you have to do ANH AND ESB 3.0, will you do DNR to the 4K Blu-Ray image to carefully eliminate the static grain from these masters like Adywan and That guy with no name are doing in their projects, and then add non-static fine grain back to it to make the image less dirty? Or are you just going to add grain on top of the image without cleaning the static grain first?
If someone did that and released a regrained version, I’d be super happy to use it as a source but I really can’t see myself doing that for three entire movies myself, it’s just too time consuming.
Possibly but only if someone points them out to me or if I notice them by chance - I’ve never actually watched through the 2019 versions and don’t really want to. 😃
And some recomposited shots that were only done in 2004, like the imperial fleet introduction.
It’s definitely an option.
Yeah, more than likely.
Actually, having recently seen a 35mm screening of the 97SE, I can confirm the matte boxes were totally still there and very visible in the theater.
Since UHD BD standard expects a larger disc, I think you should be fine with whatever you can fit on a BD50.
The English tracks are theatrically synced, not sure about all the dubs but for dubs, falling out if sync by one or two frames shouldn’t really matter.
My complaint is, while fake grain seems more natural, if it wasn’t there before you add it, you are just destroying more detail that wasn’t scrubbed out of the film with the grain.
Thank you. That’s precisely my point.
And the answer is precisely the same.
Sure, in cold mathematical terms, there may be more actual detail but at the end of the day, this is art, not maths, so it really is about what’s more pleasant to watch.
Nice work! I always cite this shot when someone asks me which shot was the hardest to despecialize.
Of course, back then, I was still using the GOUT as the unaltered footage source, so the reault was nowhere near this good 😃
The 1080p version is designed for a BD25, if you keep only the English audio and one or two dubs.
The 2160p version is over 40GB just for the video.
Short video announcement 😃
RETURN OF THE JEDI - DESPECIALIZED EDITION V3.1 IS OUT NOW!!!
Here’s HanDuet’s excellent (and wonderfully updated) guide on where to find it: https://goo.gl/1WGHBA
There may be a short delay before the public torrents option is available, but the Multipart RAR method is active and previous DEED releases have an official public torrent option now too, so hopefully, there won’t be any trouble getting it to download this time.
Detailed info can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vQS4B0y0YeESsVoayO4D134DzvPB7Vk8iVg7ZnnF1gC--BsCdMuhyC2SK7X0dKuv_lejjqMxO4lf7tj/pub
For v3.1, minor fixes were made, the biggest of which include adding a Jabba subtitle, which was missing in 3.0,
and replacing the 5.1 English audio track, where in v3.0 a custom track with additional music in the Obi-Wan ghost scene
was used by mistake.
The MKV version contains a large number of audio tracks, including the latest versions of the preservations
of the original audio mixes in DTS-HD MA, three different commentary tracks, an isolated score and dubbing
tracks in many different languages.
For v3.1, the encode has been done by a professional studio, so the compression quality is better
and the stream is now compatible for remuxing and burning a UHD Blu-Ray disc.
Big thanks to Poita, hairy_hen, schorman, Mavimao and CatBus!
More information can be found here:
originaltrilogy.com/topic/id/12905
youtube.com/HarmyDespecialized
All subtitles are from “Project Threepio v15.0”
Big thanks to CatBus!
More info here:
Either way, the answer will be no - only the 1080p version will be h264.
I don’t want to make more variants, as that would be confusing and make distribution too complicated.
No, I meant about the PS5 playback. It seems incredible that such an advanced console couldn’t do what most cheap media players can do these days. What a ripoff 😮
Really?
Yes. And the UHD should be UHD BD compatible as well.
Just a quick update. ROTJ v3.1 is all finished. I’m just waiting for the encode, which is being done by a professional company and they’re testing all kinds different settings to make sure we get the best possible compression quality. And since they’re doing it after hours in their free time, it’s taking a while but should be worth it in the end, as I wasn’t very happy with how the ROTJ v3.0 turned out in this regard.
I did get some of the raw scans used for 4K80, plus scans of some other prints from TN1 but I don’t want to go into details, as I’m not sure what they may want to keep under wraps.
I will likely now switch to 4K80 v1.0 as my primary source anyway, as most of the cleanup work has been done, which will make my work easier.
I know you’re just trolling but you’re still wrong. In film restorations, it’s normal to use scans of multiple prints where the best copy has been damaged or destroyed, which is basically what I did here - using a scan of the original negative and replacing damaged parts with scans of other prints. 😄