logo Sign In

Frank your Majesty

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jan-2015
Last activity
21-Oct-2019
Posts
1,433

Post History

Post
#948904
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

thejediknighthusezni said:

They could create a fem 005 or a homosexual 0069 and bring in 007 as a supporting character, as Marvel brings other characters to support the individual hero films. A fem 00 might work if done well. Jolie and Johannsen have paved the way. I doubt I’d see a homosexual 00 if it’s primarily a pandering, identity politics gimmick. It would have to have VERY much to recommend it otherwise.
A homosexual Bond or Captain America would be a homo-militant attack on iconic figures of British and American masculinity.
I’m still recovering from being told we MUST believe allowing every pervy bi-sexual cross-dresser to prance into any Girl’s Locker Room is the most glorious idea ever conceived, or else we’re pure evil and deserve to SUFFER AND DIE!!!

What, a post from you with normal formatting?

thejediknighthusezni said:

 I would not watch a black Bond on principle. Again, there is JUST NO WAY to divorce this kind of thing from the element of "Yyyyyeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhhh!!! Now we're really sticking it to whitey!!!!". Why should I pay big money for that?
 Again, they could easily create a 009 and bring in 007 to support. Again, it would have to offer VERY much more than an identity politics gimmick before I'd spend my money on it.

Aaaaand where back to unreadable.

Since Frink was called out for writing in all caps, isn’t this formatting a bannable offense now?

Post
#948900
Topic
Which versions are best for each viewing order?
Time

darthrush said:

I’m just curious if you enjoy the twist being preserved or the removal of episode 1 more?

Frank your Majesty said:

Also, cutting Episode 1 is important because you reduce the time of suffering through the prequels by 2 hours.

Does that answer your question? Personally I would recommend you to try Super Machete order, where you cut Clones, too. But my absolute favorite order is Mega Machete, you place the prequels between episodes 5 and 6 and then you remove them entirely.

Post
#948897
Topic
What is your personal canon?
Time

Colson said:

My personal canon is actually three separate personal canons.

Canon 1: Star Wars, by itself (original theatrical, of course). This allows for things like Luke and Leia not being related, Vader not being Luke’s father, etc. I like this idea simply because it allows me to enjoy Star Wars as a standalone film with its own separate story. Whereas Empire and Return were explicitly as sequels, Star Wars was its own, independent movie.

Canon 2: The original trilogy in its unaltered state. I consider this trilogy to be its “own thing” in that I consider it to be a story that does and should exist separately from everything else.

Canon 3: The original trilogy in its unaltered state, plus any new Disney movies that might come out. I justify not including the Special Editions/prequels by assuming that the people working on the new movies have a love for the originals similar my own love, so their head canon probably involves the unaltered originals and not the Special Editions.

I like this.

Post
#948630
Topic
Which versions are best for each viewing order?
Time

Why not both? Becasue that’s exactly what Machete order means, while it does not only mean to put the prequels between 5 and 6.

Machete order was invented in 2011, while 4-5-1-2-3-6 dates back to 2009. Obviously, Machete order builds up on that and cuts TPM.

A real life machete has following properties: A long, sharp blade and a big handle. Properties of a knife: small blade and handle. Would you call a knife “Machete” or “Small Machete”? If you want a catchy name, call it Rister order, I’ve seen that one a lot.

Post
#948575
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

What do you want to say with this? The goal of Despecialized is to recreate the theatrical version, not to “fix” it. If Prowse was visible in theaters in 1980, he should be visible in Despecialized. Things like this make people think you’re trolling.
Or did you want to post this in Adywan’s Revisited thread?

Post
#948551
Topic
Which versions are best for each viewing order?
Time

I could call a bicycle an airplane because getting from A to B is more important than pedaling, but people would still give me strange looks.

Machete order is 4-5-2-3-6, if you want to refer to 4-5-1-2-3-6, you can’t say machete order, you can call it preserve-the-twist order or cap order or, like some apparently do, Rister order.

Also, cutting Episode 1 is important because you reduce the time of suffering through the prequels by 2 hours.

Post
#948067
Topic
Which versions are best for each viewing order?
Time

darthrush said:

Frank your Majesty said:

That’s not machete order, the point of machete order is to cut episode 1.

Despite its name, that’s not its purpose. The cutting of episode 1 is only secondary compared to the true purpose of machete order.

The point is not what it’s purpose is, but that the order 4-5-2-3-6 is called machete order and the order 4-5-1-2-3-6 is not. Words mean things.

Post
#947857
Topic
Is there anything that you actually like about the prequels?
Time

yotsuya said:

It isn’t an ending, it is a “to be continued” cheat.

Maybe because the story is to be continued? It would have been more of a cliffhanger if we didn’t see her finding Luke. Just because they have a map doesn’t mean that Luke is still on that planet, he could have left and when Rey arrives she only finds clues to his next location.