logo Sign In

Frank your Majesty

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jan-2015
Last activity
21-Oct-2019
Posts
1,433

Post History

Post
#1139472
Topic
Dealing with People Selling Fan Projects
Time

As I understand it, even making the edit is violating the copyright. You cannot create a derivative work without permission of the copyright holder. However, making a fan-edit only for yourself would be considered fair-use. But fair-use only means that a copyright violation isn’t prosecuted, not that the violation is nullified.

So, in essence, creating the edit isn’t entirely legal, but also not really illegal. I could have worded that better.

Post
#1139311
Topic
Dealing with People Selling Fan Projects
Time

Han Shot First said:

scotchka said:

Han Shot First said:

I think you guys are all misunderstanding *** entertainment. They make it very clear that you are not being charged for the discs, you are being charged as compensation for the money that they spent to put the set together. Whether they are making a profit or not is impossible to tell (it is highly probable that they are), but selling artwork is not a crime, even if it is of copyrighted material. Therefor, *** has done nothing illegal. The only issue is morality, which I will admit is shaky in this circumstance, but as far as legality, there is really nothing to worry about with these people.

Hi *** entertainment!

I am not from *** I have been a member here since before *** was a thing. I’ll admit I don’t really know much about copyright laws, I was just offering my own take on the issue. Sorry if I said anything that offended you guys, you all know more about this than me hahaha

There was nothing offensive about your post. You were simply wrong.

The question was never wether fan-edits were legal. They are not. So any way of distributing fan-edits, no matter if paid or for free, is technically a copyright infringement.

The community came up with a way to at least morally justify what they are doing. Not charging people for fan-edits is part of that. Anyone selling fan-edits on ebay is therefore legally and morally in the wrong.

Post
#1133877
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Possessed said:

Nobody is telling women to go topless. All we are saying is a woman’s body shouldn’t be treated as obscene.

A woman’s body isn’t treated as anymore obscene than a man’s.

Tell that to the top half of a woman’s body.

Really?

Men can walk around without a shirt, women can’t. You’re still saying a woman’s body isn’t treated any more obscene than a man’s?

What are you even talking about?

Women have to cover their private parts, men have to cover their private parts.

But what makes a woman’s nipple more private than a man’s?

Read Chyron’s post.

chyron8472 said:

[snip] (accidental quote instead of edit.)

I don’t get it?