- Post
- #303862
- Topic
- This Pretty Much Sums the PT Up :)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/303862/action/topic#303862
- Time
Fang Zei
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 14-Oct-2006
- Last activity
- 16-Apr-2024
- Posts
- 2,768
Post History
- Post
- #303385
- Topic
- Blade Runner 2, 4, and 5-disc sets in December
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/303385/action/topic#303385
- Time
- Post
- #301992
- Topic
- Is there a 2001 reference in AOTC?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301992/action/topic#301992
- Time
- Post
- #301599
- Topic
- so I finally acquired the '95 boxset
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301599/action/topic#301599
- Time
- Post
- #301533
- Topic
- so I finally acquired the '95 boxset
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301533/action/topic#301533
- Time
I don't doubt that Lucas honestly thought people would prefer the Special Editions when he wrote those words back in '95, but for crying out loud, he's had ten years to get over the fact that they don't. Now that Spielberg has shown him up (or whatever) with the new close encounters release, Lucas doesn't really have much of an excuse to not do the same with Star Wars. Granted, he would have to go through more trouble since you can't just seamlessly branch both versions onto the same disc, but how would it not be worth it? I think one of the reasons Spielberg decided to go all out with the blu-ray release is that he realized people wouldn't have much of a reason to buy it if he didn't. The reason we still might not get what we want with the next Star Wars release is, well, it's STAR WARS and not close encounters. People probably will buy it again when it finally hits hi-def just like they did with dvd back in '04, and maybe we OOT fans are more of a minority than we'd like to think and Lucas will just have to decide if it's worth the trouble just to please a few more fans.
In any event, I say three more years at the most until we see the next release. Close Encounters hit dvd in '01 so that gives some idea.
- Post
- #301503
- Topic
- so I finally acquired the '95 boxset
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301503/action/topic#301503
- Time
- Post
- #301496
- Topic
- so I finally acquired the '95 boxset
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301496/action/topic#301496
- Time
I got the '95 vhs of ANH for Christmas that year.
Cut to early May of '05, I'm back home from college for the weekend to look for a summer job. I stop by my local video store and they've got the '86 vhs of Jedi on sale for 5 dollars! There isn't enough money in my wallet so I race back home (takes, like, a minute), race back and buy it.
Then only a week later I'm in southern Delaware with some friends at a record and tape traders and I notice the '95 vhs of both Empire and Jedi. At last, my collection is complete! Then I get home and find out that the Empire tape is basically shot. There's static like every single second and the tape is wrinkled on one edge. I'm not totally ruling out the possibility that the magnets in my bag fucked it up (it's a flap bag with magnets that snap together instead of those plastic things) since the Empire tape was probably closer to the magnets than the Jedi tape, even though I'm pretty sure I put stuff in between the tapes and the magnets (in retrospect, it was pretty stupid to even put them in there at all).
Back then I was convinced the store had sold me a bad copy and was torn up by the fact that the complete boxset had been lying right there on the shelf, I just hadn't gotten it since I already had a copy of the original movie.
Then January of '06 rolled around and I discovered the whole fan preservation thing. After a couple weeks of torrenting, I had the cowclopsv2 trilogy. But that's really only good for watching on my computer or on a widescreen tv (which neither I nor my parents have), and I'm not getting the GOUT unless it's like 2 dollars per movie. Speaking of which, Black Friday is right around to corner so who knows maybe that'll happen.
So, today I decide for whatever reason to stop by the CD cellar and as it turned out they had the '95 boxset and I ended up getting it for a cool 5 dollars.
First off, I have a question for anyone who knows the answer. The logo on the ANH box and sticker says 20th Century Fox but the boxes and stickers for Empire and Jedi say CBS/FOX (I know there's nothing wrong since the copies I got in Delaware were like this also, I'm just curious). Does this have something to do with the rights to ANH switching over the Lucasfilm around that time?
Anyways, I find it hi-fuckin-larious what's written on the box, considering what would happen in later years.
"The appeal of Star Wars has gone beyond anything I could have ever imagined. I am pleased that for the final video release of Star Wars in its original version, we can present it with the best sound and picture quality yet available, thanks to THX digital mastering.
In the years to come I hope you, your children, and your children's children will enjoy not only this trilogy but also the adventures yet to come in the continually unfolding Star Wars universe."
-George Lucas
This also raises something I was going to start a thread over but I'll just ask here. What are we going to do if, several years from now (because you know it'll be at least that long), the next release is announced and the remastered OOT isn't part of it? Will we resign ourselves to the fact that we'll have to wait until the movies enter public domain so we can hire Robert A. Harris?
- Post
- #301103
- Topic
- How did you envision the prequels?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301103/action/topic#301103
- Time
- Post
- #301060
- Topic
- Original theatrical subtitles....
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301060/action/topic#301060
- Time
Originally posted by: zombie84
I think all of the OT footage in EOD is just taken from the Laserdisks though.
I think all of the OT footage in EOD is just taken from the Laserdisks though.
You mean they pulled a dr.gonzo/cowclopsv2 when they made it?
This is something I've long suspected, and if it's true that means it's another nail in the "we'll never see the OOT restored/remastered" coffin. Is there any proof of this, like softness or a "blowed up" look, etc?
When thedigitalbits broke the non-anamorphic news in May of '06 they said they were pretty sure the footage from EoD was filmprint-sourced, although their only logic was that it probably couldn't have come from anywhere else and still be in anamorphic video. That said, if one of the earlier laserdisc releases did in fact use the original subs it opens up the possibility that the EoD footage was not filmprint-sourced. I guess it all depends on how you interpret Kevin Burns' line from the '04 press junket that they "were granted Papal dispensation to go back and use the footage from the pre-SE release .... but I will say what was shocking was that those scenes .... in our minds eye they looked a lot better than they do when you go back and revisit them and you do see how the quality of the print (or) - the quality of the negative really doesn't hold up the way you think it might, so you kind of understand why things have been revised and digitally restored."
- Post
- #301043
- Topic
- Original theatrical subtitles....
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301043/action/topic#301043
- Time
- Post
- #300912
- Topic
- How did you envision the prequels?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300912/action/topic#300912
- Time
- Post
- #300851
- Topic
- Blu-ray Disc or HD-DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300851/action/topic#300851
- Time
Originally posted by: Arnie.d
I think both HD DVD and Blu-ray use a 405nm blue laser.
I think both HD DVD and Blu-ray use a 405nm blue laser.
this is correct
- Post
- #300850
- Topic
- The Beginning: Making 'Episode I': A comedy masterpiece
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300850/action/topic#300850
- Time
One thing I remember noticing this time, now that I was watching with a more discerning eye, is that George actually seems to get genuinely annoyed at one point during that conversation he, McCallum and (I think) Burtt are having after getting out of the screening room for that first roughcut. One of the two other guys says something in that slow, trying to say it the nicest he can way and George sort of snaps and goes "yea, yea, yea, I know, this and that" just as the camera cuts away.
Another thing I caught the fuller implication of this time around was how Titanic had not been released when Episode I started shooting, so when they're doing the pickups in Spring of '98 that's why George says "we're never going to beat Titanic" when Frank Oz asks him how well he thinks Episode I is going to do. Also, I didn't notice until this time that George was saying "More American Graffiti" and how it only made 2 cents (or something to that effect).
And, of course, seeing that ending with the Rick McCallum premiere and all the fans screaming upon the cut to the title shot conjured up all kinds of feelings, especially after reading someone's account (I think it was magnoliafan's) of pretty much that same thing happening and the very steep downward decline the rest of the movie after the opening crawl was.
CO, I was thinking the same thing about how Lucas probably went in a different direction than he was going to for eps II and III after all of the TPM backlash, and I echo HotRod's sentiments when I say that AOTC is the true disappointment of the PT. It was nothing but filler to get to Episode III, and even parts of that ended up being filler. The reason I look at TPM differently is that it was only the beginning of the story. Lucas could've gone in any direction he wanted to get from there to Episode IV, and it's the direction he took that disappointed me.
- Post
- #300827
- Topic
- Family Guy to kick off season with 1 hour Star Wars spoof
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300827/action/topic#300827
- Time
- Post
- #300762
- Topic
- Comprehensive List of SE Differences
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300762/action/topic#300762
- Time
- Post
- #300757
- Topic
- Family Guy to kick off season with 1 hour Star Wars spoof
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300757/action/topic#300757
- Time
Originally posted by: see you auntie
Fox Yes, Lucasfilm No.
The packaging is my only interest and why I made mention of it here. Family Guy and Fox really put together a great set and would like to see something like this for oh I don't know... a real Star Wars dvd release.
If it was done by Lucasfilm it would be nothing this elaborate. From every SW dvd release to Indy Lucasfilm's packaging and coverart have, to put it bluntly, Fucking Sucked.
Originally posted by: zombie84
..........and yikes look at that packaging! Is this thing being made by Lucasfilm?
..........and yikes look at that packaging! Is this thing being made by Lucasfilm?
Fox Yes, Lucasfilm No.
The packaging is my only interest and why I made mention of it here. Family Guy and Fox really put together a great set and would like to see something like this for oh I don't know... a real Star Wars dvd release.
If it was done by Lucasfilm it would be nothing this elaborate. From every SW dvd release to Indy Lucasfilm's packaging and coverart have, to put it bluntly, Fucking Sucked.
yea but they'd probably just use the excuse that they'd need to make millions of copies in order to justify cheaping out on the packaging.
- Post
- #300641
- Topic
- Does the PT work as a fun & fluff comic book production?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300641/action/topic#300641
- Time
....
I forgot where I was going with all of this so I'll just leave it at that.
- Post
- #300345
- Topic
- What happened to the live-action show?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300345/action/topic#300345
- Time
- Post
- #300396
- Topic
- Cash cow-abanga shit, another SW OT dvd repackaging for the holidays! Luca$$$
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300396/action/topic#300396
- Time
- Post
- #300179
- Topic
- What happened to the live-action show?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300179/action/topic#300179
- Time
- Post
- #300169
- Topic
- Cash cow-abanga shit, another SW OT dvd repackaging for the holidays! Luca$$$
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300169/action/topic#300169
- Time
- Post
- #300035
- Topic
- A question about NTSC telecine
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300035/action/topic#300035
- Time
Sorry to drag on this question, but can someone who knows please tell me if movies are recorded onto blu-ray/hddvd at exactly 24.000 frames per second? I keep stumbling across message boards in my google searching where people say things like "it has to output it at 23.976 because that's the only thing your television understands" even when they're talking about high definition teleivions. Then there's also that 23.98 framerate I keep hearing about. Please, someone just clear this up for me. I haven't gotten into either format yet because I don't own an hdtv, although I do own a 1024by768 4:3 monitor with both vga and dvi if it makes any difference (don't know if it would be possible to hook up a set top device to this). So yea, right now I can't watch 16:9 video in anything higher than 1024 by 576, however the big appeal to me about these new high definition formats hasn't been the resolution but the fact that it bypasses the existing ntsc and pal systems, allowing us to watch our movies at their exact framerate (at least that's what I've been led to believe). If someone could clear this up I'd greatly appreciate it.
EDIT: yea sorry for all that. I did some digging and I'm now almost totally positive it's exactly 24.000 frames per second for both hddvd and blu-ray. I stumbled upon a forum where people were talking about "cadence" which is something I've heard brought up around here before.
- Post
- #300032
- Topic
- Blu-ray Disc or HD-DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300032/action/topic#300032
- Time
Or would both blu-ray and hddvd having 24 fps playback give them yet another thing to have in common and be yet another reason for why you should just get a combo player?!
EDIT: yea sorry for all that. I did some digging and I'm now almost totally positive it's exactly 24.000 frames per second for both hddvd and blu-ray. I stumbled upon a forum where people were talking about "cadence" which is something I've heard brought up around here before.
- Post
- #300017
- Topic
- Blu-ray Disc or HD-DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300017/action/topic#300017
- Time
- Post
- #299968
- Topic
- Would you give up ESB in exchange for...?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/299968/action/topic#299968
- Time
Sorry to sound whiny people, but I'd prefer to have my cake and eat it too. Give me the original versions of all six movies remastered and then Lucas can go do whatever he wants to them.