logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#609008
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

skyjedi2005 said:


You would rate Blue Brothers higher had you seen the  sequel, Blues Brothers 2000.

One of the worst movies i have ever seen.  I am surprised it even got theatrically released and not just straight to tv and video.

 


I did see Blues Brothers 2000, once, back in 2001, and I recall liking it a lot. Suffice it to say, though, that means absolutely nothing since I liked a lot of stuff back then that I don't anymore, and vice-versa.

Post
#608901
Topic
The thread where we make enemies out of friends, aka the abortion debate thread
Time

Warbler said:


yeah, I've never been too comfortable with some of the Old Testament stuff.   I've often wondered if those kinds of things were truly ordered by God,  or did the people back then just think it was, or did they make it up to use an excuse to justify the slaughter they wanted to do?


I'd say it was a mixture of the latter two. If any entity approximating the Christian God exists, then He had no part in the genocides commited in the OT - that, or He "grew up" sometime between the OT and NT, mellowing out and losing a lot of his wrathfulness. Inerrancy goes out the window in either case (not that that's a bad thing IMO).

Post
#608491
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

greenpenguino said:


Ferris Bueller's Day Off

A real good sweet, warm-hearted comedy. Maybe it's because I didn't grow up with it, but I sympathised a lot more with the adult characters than maybe I should've done. I also didn't particularly like the Ferris Bueller character very much, I know he was supposed to be cool and 'rad' for skipping school, but having gone through that phase myself in my life it really bothered me.


This.

Post
#608040
Topic
The Secret History of Star Wars
Time

Fang Zei said:


In regards to the "What will they do with the EU" question, I think they'll simply set Episode VII at whenever they're at now in the books (40 years after ROTJ). Even if it blatantly ignores everything that's happened, they can at least retcon certain things easier than just saying "oh yeah, by the way, Episodes VII VIII and IX happened only 20 years after Jedi and the characters just NEVER mentioned it afterward."


If that happens, I will commit metaphorical murder/suicide.

Post
#608034
Topic
The thread where we make enemies out of friends, aka the abortion debate thread
Time

Warbler said:



Bingowings said:

Not if you are a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Jain or Socrates, Plato or Pythagoras or a follower of one of the many Animistic beliefs or indeed a rationalist (who doesn't believe in a human soul at all).


true, but can you find me anyone that believes a mouse has a human soul? 


Well, wouldn't Hindus/Buddhists believe that could happen, what with good/bad karma determining what a person becomes in the next life?

Post
#607621
Topic
Michael Arndt heavily involved in writing the new SW trilogy
Time

Jaitea said:



Bingowings said:

If the films need to pick up one thing from the PT it's Padme.

Luke has had his relationship with his father dragged out over three films.

The character of Padme kind of rolled into the dirt in ROTS.

Wouldn't Luke want to know more about her?

Wouldn't Leia become closer to her fragmented memories of her now that the Empire is gone?

If the OT was about absent fathers I think this one should be about absent mothers.

Both are mythical tropes and it would be interesting to explore the Star Wars universe from a more female perspective.


That would be crap......Star Wars the chick Trilogy


It wouldn't necessarily have to be crap. We're talking about Padme here, though, a vapid, dimensionless character who deserves to be retconned out of existence, so yeah, it would be crap concentrating on her.