This user has been banned.
doubleofive said:
I'm sure that was cost prohibitive for an in-house effects studio. It was never supposed to be a grand restoration, it was supposed to be something to get TV stations to want to air 40 year old reruns.
In other words, they're cheap.
Jefe' said:
I remember when Lucasfilm was finally going to release the OT on DVD for the first time back in like 1998/99.
Wait -- what?
I tried to create a sock by the name of Bizarro Ric two years ago or so, but I must have mistyped the e-mail address 'cause I never received an e-mail to activate the account, therefore Bizarro Ric never came to be (much to my shameful chagrin).
As for socks I succeeded in creating ... let's just say that while I won't say I was EnergizerDuracell, I won't say that I wasn't him, either.
I'm going off the pre-Crisis comics, actually =P
Hello, everyone. This is the DuracellEnergizer from Earth-2, and I hereby give my vote to Earth-2 Ric so he can finish what Earth-0 Ric started.
RicOlie_2 said:
I can't do that! I'm NOT becoming Supreme Chancellor here, I'm just taking up the position of chief observer and increaser of self esteem.
Ah, well, I'll vote for you anyway, as it serves the absurdist cause.
Dinah the Dionysus-worshipping deinonychus dared to date Denny the deist dimetrodon.
Tack said:
darklordoftech said:
Abrams, the Sith died in ROTJ.
We get it! You don't like the continuations of the Empire or the Sith! You have expressed this opinion on SEVERAL different occasions! Let! It! Goooooooo!
I was wondering when his posts were going to make someone snap.
I'll vote for you again in the second thread if you promise to lower taxes and legalize first cousin marriage.
Mmm ... shorts.
Darth Lucas said:
You see, I didn't mind the excessive throwbacks to Wrath of Khan in STID. When you think about it, it was a very logical way of doing things. It's not like Khan wouldn't exist and try essentially the same thing just because the timeline shifted. He would still exist (apparently as a white guy? but i forgive that because Cumberbatch was fantastic) and still want the same things, therefore a very similar story would unfold, only things would be slightly different because of the alternate timeline. It made for an interesting movie at the very least.
And here I thought poor rationales for poor writing were limited to the prequels. *sigh*
She (1965) - 6.5/10
A Christmas Carol (2009)
This is, without a doubt, my least favourite of all the adaptations of the novel I've seen. Still, I give it an extra point for Carrey's performance and the quality of the animation.
7/10
Toy Story 2 (1999) - 8/10
Is There a Stargate? (2003) - 2/10
Eh, I considered that a glitch.
HUZZAH!
I wonder if LG Stotler is long for these forums.
statto said:
The problem with that is that all the best Trek films (II, IV, VI, VIII) have been action oriented, and (with the exception of Nemesis) all the worst ones (I, III, V, VII, IX) have been the character pieces.
Mielr said:
I still cherish my OT "ART OF" books (pre-SE).
You'll all controlled by the Reptilians. Admit it.
Why not just go the Lucas route and copy & paste Harrison's head on someone else's body?
An evil Emperor who points out the obvious ... the end times really have arrived.
I wonder how many times Walt's rolled around in his grave. Enough to have worn his way through the bottom by now, I'll bet.
I think there is one thing we can agree on, and that is ...
... the truth is out there.
Bring back kenkraly.
And twooffour.
^I still don't understand the background of this meme.