logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#728494
Topic
Should Jacen, Jaina, and Mara be in the newer films?
Time

hairy_hen said:

The newer films can never replace the Thrawn trilogy.  Those will always be the true episodes 7, 8, and 9, the way I see it.

Maybe the movies will be good, maybe they won't.  I lean towards the second possibility . . . but regardless of their potential quality, just the fact that they exist pisses me off.

Nothing that Jar Jar Abrams and his cohorts do will ever be worth a damn, because these movies are not sequels to the real original trilogy.  They are sequels to the special editions and the prequels, and since I've already negated the existence of those, the new movies are relagated to the same apocryphal status.

The real story of what happened after the original trilogy was already told by Timothy Zahn over 20 years ago.  The fact that most of the rest of the EU sucks dog balls does not in any way diminish that.  This is my final word on the matter and opinions to the contrary leave me entirely unmoved.

Pretty much my opinion on the matter as well. It doesn't matter if the ST turns out good or bad, I already have my own personal vision of the post-ROTJ era of the SW Galaxy mapped out and the sequels with never mesh with it. 

Post
#728457
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

SilverWook said:

The monkey whose eyes were matted into the shot could technically sign those photos too. ;)

I'd never give him the chance. Chimps would just as soon gouge my eyes out with a pen as sign a photo for me.

Or so I've been told ... by Humphrey Bogart ... who was wearing a rainbow zoot suit and a piano key tie ... in a fever dream brought on by eating too many Guatemalan insanity peppers ...

Post
#728452
Topic
Who is Ignoring You, and Who are You Ignoring? (was: Who is Ignoring You? (was: Hello all, I'm back!))
Time

Truth is, I try not to talk dirty too often on this forum, and the last time I did, I did it

A. To mock the content of hotrod's original post, which I felt was disrespectful and distasteful myself.

and

B. In a fashion that I felt wasn't too raunchy/vulgar. Believe me, if I really wanted to be nasty, I could easily use phrases and descriptions which would make hotrod's look like the pure and chaste writings of an asexual choir boy by comparison.

If it bothers you guys that much, though, then I'll be careful to avoid doing so in the future.

Post
#728447
Topic
Mods please delete this thread. I am sorry for attacking Hotrod.
Time

This thread makes me think of another feature this site could use -- a "V-chip" option that allows a poster to block out any profanity s/he wishes not to read.

Of course, it wouldn't work for vulgarities that have been deliberately misspelled to get around this, but you just have to play the cards you're dealt.

Post
#728320
Topic
What's the story behind this deleted scene (Vader cuts Kenobi in half)?
Time

ray_afraid said:

Tyrphanax said:

Ronster said:

pablumatic said:

Obi-Wan's cloak probably should have suffered some type of burns in the movie we saw.

 Considering Vader tries to put the imaginary fire out with his foot I would say so too.

I always figured that was him confusedly confirming that Obi-Wan had disappeared; making sure there wasn't a body in the cloak.

 Ha! I hate that shot.

Vader must have really, really, REALLY bad vision.

Post
#728316
Topic
Should Jacen, Jaina, and Mara be in the newer films?
Time

Fang Zei said:

Back around 2009 when they decided to jump ahead a hundred years in the continuity for the Legacy comics, I figured part of why they were doing it was to provide a huge empty space should a sequel trilogy happen someday. Meanwhile, they continued to write the ongoing adventures of Han, Luke and Leia in the novels.

They could've set Episode VII within the existing continuity if they'd wanted to. They didn't need to address much of what'd happened in the intervening 40 years, just that Chewie had died at some point, Luke was a widower with a son, Han and Leia had a daughter and granddaughter, etc.

I honestly believe they could've gotten away with picking up Episode VII at wherever the books were up to and still told a fresh, engaging and original story that would please the movie-only fans.

There's no way in hell I'd have been able to enjoy an ST set in the Legacy era -- just knowing the movies were set in that timeframe alone would have ruined it for me.

"Oh, Luke, Han, and Leia are going on another adventure! Well, shucks, I already know it won't amount to anything 'cause in a hundred years the Empire will be back and the Sith will control the galaxy once again!"

Yeah, count me in among the many who are glad the post-ROTJ EU was jettisoned from the canon. It isn't worth keeping the Thrawn Trilogy, the Corellian Trilogy, and all the other various post-ROTJ EU stories I like in continuity if the Legacy era is also included.

Post
#728151
Topic
Should Jacen, Jaina, and Mara be in the newer films?
Time

Darth Lars said:

When I say "fan", I am talking about people who are real fans, not just people who like Star Wars. Practically everyone likes Star Wars, but not everyone is a fan. The fan community is so much larger than the OT-diehards on this forum who see Star Wars as being only the three original movies.

Every person that I know personally who I would classify as being a Star Wars fan has read at least one book in the post-ROTJ EU continuity. People know and like these characters. For example, in my local 501st Garrison alone, there is soon to be a third Mara Jade costumer.

Star Wars fans tend to buy not only books but a whole lot of other merchandise, and that has provided for a a significant portion of Lucasfilm's revenue in-between the movies.

Ah, yes -- the groupthink mentality. How keen.

Post
#727966
Topic
ATTENTION ALL UK PEOPLE: How will/would you vote in the referendum?
Time

Pfft. The maps'll never be heavily redrawn in my boring lifetime.

I'm going to go into suspended animation now and I won't come out 'til 2777. Perhaps by then China will be split into three different countries, Canada and America will become one country (in name as well as fact), and all mainstream rappers and pop stars will live in isolation on an island subjected to atom bomb tests.

Post
#727965
Topic
Last comic read
Time

Since I've been reading a lot of comics over the past couple of months, I thought I'd make a few posts about most of them and give my basic opinion on each of them.

Post #1: Spider-Girl #½-24 & Annual 1999

Before I begin, I'd just like to recount my own personal history involving this series.

To make a long story short, Ben Reilly was my Spider-Man growing up as a kid in the '90s and I was completely pissed off when he was re-retconned back into a clone, ignominously killed off, and re-replaced by Peter. In hindsight, I realize the Clone Saga was 70% crap and that Ben should never have been retconned into being the original Peter in the first place, but still, I was angry and disappointed that a character I sympathized with and enjoyed reading about was all but erased from existence as if he had never been (I'm still angry about it, to be perfectly honest, but that's another story for another time.).

Anyway, even though my Spider-Man was dead and dust filling someone's ashtray, I continued to read the books. While I'll admit they weren't all that bad -- at least not in the beginning -- they just didn't hold the same spark for me. The sudden, abrupt departure of too many regular artists at one time -- Mark Bagley, Sal Buscema, and Dan Jurgens -- also left me feeling as if I'd been picked up and dropped into a whole 'nother universe that was weird and strange to me.

Moving on, my dissatisfaction for the Spidey titles kicked into overdrive when two things happened: Norman Osborn became a poor man's Lex Luthor who was everywhere all the time and Aunt May was "resurrected". The latter development, in particular, left me feeling sick inside; that was when it fully sunk in that nothing that ever happened in comics mattered a damn because anything progressive -- anything that caused characters to actually grow and change -- that a creator could ever bring to the table was just going to be swept under the rug once another creator who hated it came along (I'm looking at you, Mr. John "The-Status-Quo-Is-God-Unless-I-Don't-Want-It-To-Be" Byrne.).

Suffice it to say, my status as a Spidey fan was pretty much dead at the time and I had all but given up reading the comics. Then I happened to see the comic above on the spinner rack of one of the local grocery stores.

As a typically sexist boy who thought girls were icky, I didn't read many comics focusing of superheroines. Truth be told, I probably wouldn't have bothered picking up the comic above save for one thing: the Ben Reilly suit. Yep, I bought the comic because of the suit Spider-Girl was wearing, a suit belonging to my Spider-Man, the Spider-Man the writers had decided to treat -- and dispose of -- like shit. My interest piqued, I just had to take a look through it.

Suffice it to say (again), Spider-Girl turned out to be the exact comic I needed to read at the time. There was no angsty bullshit about Osborns and Goblins and genetically engineered actresses, there was just a lot of action and humour and a respect for what had came before. Having re-read those comics now, at the point in my life where I am now surrounded by a bunch of deconstructed, decompressed garbage written for stupid man-children who like seeing their favourite characters derailed, assassinated, and raped, that opinion has only been reinforced a hundredfold.

tl;dr version: I love these comics -- I love the characters, I love the humour, and I love the lack of brutal violence, gore, and stupid decompression -- and I'm going to continue reading the series until the final issue. Then, if things are still running smoothly, I'm going to move on to the spinoff titles Amazing Spider-Girl and Spectacular Spider-Girl

Post
#727898
Topic
Ways to Do the Prequels with No Spoilers for the OT.
Time

GrandMaster88 said:

If you don't want spoilers for the original films, why not set them in a completely different era? Maybe a hundred years  or so in the past... A thousand even!!! The characters don't have to be at all related to those in the empire era and thus a whole new story can be told...

Then you wouldn't be writing prequels to the OT, you'd be writing Tales of the Jedi or Knights of the Old Republic-type storylines.