logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#940137
Topic
The imperialscum "Furiously Doing His Taxes" Thread
Time

imperialscum said:

Yes, my posts may be confident (which might be irritating to some people) but they are never offensive.

No, of course not.

imperialscum said:

Dek Rollins said:

Anyone else here a Sonic the Hedgehog fan? Just curious.

I use to be when I was about 7. Not long afterwards, those kind of games became too primitive for me to enjoy.

Not directly. Only obliquely, through subtle insinuations.

Post
#940110
Topic
The Unofficial Complete REVISITED SAGA Ideas and Random Discussion Thread
Time

Darth Lucas said:

I will agree that the duels in the PT may be more visually stimulating and appealing, but in terms of characterization and emotion, the OT duels are way ahead of anything in the PT.

I don’t see how Dooku and Hayden spinning coloured glowsticks above their heads in extreme closeup, CGI Yoda bouncing around like a constipated frog, CGI Palpatine leaping off the walls, or Obi-Wan and Hayden twirling their lightsabers around like synchronized baton twirlers could ever be considered visually stimulating, let alone appealing.

Post
#939887
Topic
"Normal" people trying to sound like they are SW experts
Time

mapet318 said:

I’m not in-the-know. What’s wrong with wookieepedia?

Personally, I find Wookieepedia flawed when it comes to distinguishing pre-PT continuity from post-PT continuity and original authorial intent from later retcons.

So, if you’re just a casual fan just wanting basic info on any given SW topic, Wookieepedia’s a good resource. If you’re more interested in, say, figuring out how the early EU envisioned the Clone Wars and the rise of the Empire, however, you’ll have to get your hands dirty and seek out the various old novels and sourcebooks for that kind of information.

Post
#939877
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

LuckyGungan2001 said:

Smithers said:

Fant4stic: 4/10

Took too long to get started but wasn’t completely terrible until the half-way point. Terrible CGI is basically unforgivable in the movie and a lot of stuff makes no sense. I don’t even know why I watched it.

You are being far too generous with your 4/10.

I have too much respect for the source material to even watch the trailer for that abomination.

Post
#939555
Topic
Awesome Star Wars art (pic heavy!!)
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Tyrphanax said:

“You know, my hips overheat a lot.”

Exactly what I thought, right after thinking “that is the exact opposite of what the character is.”

I find fan art mostly very depressing.

Too often, I find official art moreso.

Case in point, here’s a non-SW example:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwnieyWtd71r34y4ho1_1280.jpg

Post
#939542
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Dek Rollins said:

TV’s Frink said:

I don’t really care about the actual ratings, but basically equating those four movies is crazy talk.

One of those four,
is not like the other ones…

I like Treasure Planet. It’s not fantastic, but I enjoy it. Or were you not referring to that?

Since I gave Treasure Planet a 7, I’m not exactly considering it equal with those other three, anyway, as they are half a point higher.

But whatever. *shrug*