DuracellEnergizer

Feeling irascible since his divorce from Sonia Greene, methinks.

dahmage said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

I miss titties.

What I misread, but only because I mistook you for a baby that just graduated from breastfeeding.

Lol, same here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I

Still not gonna fall for your links. That has remained unclicked.

CANDYBUTT!

Possessed said:

Well that’s poking enough don’t you think Duracell?

Oh me oh my, YES.

But damn, so many posts. Better get started reporting. . . .

[JEDIT]

Well, not so many posts as I expected. Regardless, I meant what I said and I did what I said I’d do; I’ve reported the worst of frevious’ recent posts.

[RETURN OF THE JEDIT]

Missed the warning. Now I feel silly.

In spite of living in Canuckistan, I’ll still get to see 80+% of the eclipse.

yhwx said:

Well that was a good couple of months without ImpScum.

I guess somebody’s gotta take up the slack now that Darth Idiostuperific is gone.

I haven’t made a half-decent collage in ages. Either the clippings I have suck or I don’t know how to make the most of said clippings or both.

The solution to Alderaan’s problem: To ignore every single aspect and item of the SW franchise he doesn’t care for – ie. everything apart from the OOT.

You’d think it’d be easy to follow this solution, yet Alderaan continues to dwell in his own personal, repetitive Hell.

BEYOND BELIEF: THE SECRET GOSPEL OF THOMAS – ELAINE PAGELS

This book pulls a bit of a bait and switch. Going by the cover and the blurb on the back, you’d get the idea its focused primarily on the Gospel of Thomas. Really, though, aside from a chapter which discusses the Gospel of Thomas and how the Gospel of John might relate to it, the book’s really all about early Christianity, the unity – or lack thereof – of its disparate factions, and the factors which contributed to the formation of the Christian canon/orthodox mentality as we have them today.

Still, it’s quite a good read. Pagels is a gifted writer, I learned things about the early Church I hadn’t known before, and getting to read the Gospel of Thomas itself was … euphoric; a number of its teachings correlate pretty strongly with my own theological musings.

8/10

“Artistic freedom means that the amateur filmmaker is never forced to sacrifice visual drama and beauty to a stream of words…to the relentless activity and explanations of a plot…nor is the amateur production expected to return profit on a huge investment by holding the attention of a massive and motley audience for 90 minutes…Instead of trying to invent a plot that moves, use the movement of wind, or water, children, people, elevators, balls, etc. as a poem might celebrate these. And use your freedom to experiment with visual ideas; your mistakes will not get you fired.”

– Maya Deren

Lord Haseo said:

Density said:

Obi-Wan Kenobi? Now there’s a movie I’ve wanted to see for a long time… A long time.

Seriously this is the only rumored anthology movie concept I genuinely wanted to happen. If they use Ewan and go for a kind of Western vibe, as some have suggested, it could be great. Why? Because even though the character is familiar, the concept is different for a Star Wars movie. A smaller-scale, character-driven movie that’s about more relatable struggles and not about saving the universe or giving us answers to questions we never asked? That would be refreshing. See: Logan. In fact I can see this having a lot of parallels with Logan.

THIIIIIIS

Also I hope they make Cad Bane the main antagonist.

Only if he keeps that shitkicker hat at home.

At least it wasn’t Darth Id.

generalfrevious said:

We are still headed for a second holocaust in the next three years. The United States by 2020 will prove itself to be the most racist and genocidal civilization humanity has ever known. I’m glad people are devoting their time debating about breastfeeding in public, when we have the most evil man ever seen in US history occupying the White House.

I can say the most hyperbolic things here, and they will always pale in comparison with out current reality.

I’ve an idea – why don’t you follow this rule

• No ridiculous doom saying (like all non-Trump supporters will be rounded up and executed)

and restrict all these edifying little thoughts of yours to this wonderful thread, 'cause I’m goddamn sick of you, your Chicken Little bullshit, and the reeking miasma you bring to this forum. I’m not going to tolerate it in one of my threads any longer. Keep poking this bear, and he WILL report you.

Nobody appreciates my muses.

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

I miss titties.

What I misread, but only because I mistook you for a baby that just graduated from breastfeeding.

Lol, same here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I

TV’s Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

I miss titties.

What I misread, but only because I mistook you for a baby that just graduated from breastfeeding.

I’m no baby! I’m a big boy now!

Neglify?

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

darth_ender said:

I think this thread is never gonna take off.

Maybe if you included some pictures of breasts (with nursing babies covering the nipples, of course).

That would apparently still be nudity tho

Now I have this disturbing mental image of a woman pole dancing with nursing babies instead of tassels.

Are they demon babies with piranha teeth?

I miss titles.

ray_afraid said:

And Duracell should use his awesome avatar with him and the lasers and the 3d glasses.

Perhaps in the near future, after my present euphoria has receded.

yhwx said:

darth_ender said:

^Maybe not the worst, but one of Frink’s worst for sure.

Behind HANDSOME WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES, of course?

Since Frink doesn’t/didn’t seem to know what a handsome woman is, most certainly.

“A boy’s best friend is his celebrity crush.”

Since I’m late to this party:

God, do I ❤️ this woman.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

And sometimes it’s the man who has the larger pair. Case in point:

You Are Point