This user has been banned.
The problem is that film used as a verb is quite efficient, compared to capture with a digital movie camera or even shoot in digital 4K.
And no one has coined a similar term that conveys the technology involved. We could steal a phrase from A Clockwork Orange and say we’re viddying it? 😉
Record?
Shoot?
Visual/aural data storage?
^Purrfection.
I’d prefer more creative names for the original characters. Aside from that, I think your ideas for a ST-turned-PT are very strong.
You guys should just start a pedant thread.
I want to bitch freely about people who refer to instrumental music as “songs”, so +1.
I remember how indifferent I was to the whole event, upset only because the news coverage kept me from watching my regularly scheduled TV shows.
I was such a selfish, uncaring, fucking asshole as a teenager.
There’ll be a hockey franchise in Hades before Disney ever releases original cuts of any of their films again.
More like defunct, superceded thread. But YMMV.
“Edge of Eternia” would’ve made a great name for a glam metal song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgiFRTdqZpU
Ugh. Just ugh.
I’d say when Hayden brings his A-game, he’s an average actor.
^Exactly.
The British method of writing out dates makes so much more sense than the North American.
?
The Brits write dates out in the order of day-month-year. A much more sequential, linear approach than the haphazard “month-day-year” method popular this side of the pond, wouldn’t you say?
“Thief! If you don’t want to die, kill your money.”
In my case, it’s lack of love, courage, and money.
Anything Greivous makes everything hurt.
Possessed hates cookies, remember?
There was a magazine sized issue part of the Marvel Super Special run and an oversized giant edition.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vinatge-Marvel-Super-Special-Magazine-The-Empire-Strikes-Back-Comic-Adapt-/272839730037
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MARVEL-SPECIAL-EDITION-2-Star-Wars-The-EMPIRE-STRIKES-BACK-Oversize-100-Pages-/132322596548
Can’t recall what version of Yoda appeared in them though. I probably had the oversized edition but those things were hard to store with one’s regular sized comics.I have the Norwegian version of that edition, and Yoda looks more or less normal in it. He’s still smaller than in the movie, but his face looks like the proper final design.
I’ve read (and own) several versions of Marvel’s ESB adaptation and I’ve only seen two versions. In both he’s too small, and in the second Williamson mostly just re-drew Yoda’s face/head.
https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11124/111247379/4753904-dsc00139.jpg
The gradient shading in those pics! A great example of how “realistic” Special Editionist re-coloring of vintage comics has infected the modern comic book industry. Not even an inset illustration in a book can go without “improvement”.
Looking at that literally makes my eyes hurt. How anyone could believe that muddy, ugly shit-smear is an improvement over the original colouring is beyond my comprehension.
How to direct a Disney Star Wars film:
#1) Please Kathleen Kennedy.
#2) Always make sure you know what #1 means.
Take it to the Holy **** Thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYx8IHJ9dWE
ALSO ANDROIDS ARE HUMANOID ROBOTS AND ROBOTS HAVE COMPUTERS IN THEM
Nuh-uh. Not always. Sometimes they’re synthetic organisms created in the laboratory.
Nuh-uh. Never. All robots are computers. If it has biological parts, it’s not a robot.
Wookieepedia’s article on androids said:
Authors have used the term android in more diverse ways than robot or cyborg. In some fictional works, the difference between a robot and android is only their appearance, with androids being made to look like humans on the outside but with robot-like internal mechanics.[3] In other stories, authors have used the word “android” to mean a wholly organic, yet artificial, creation.[3] Other fictional depictions of androids fall somewhere in between.[3]
ALSO ANDROIDS ARE HUMANOID ROBOTS AND ROBOTS HAVE COMPUTERS IN THEM
Nuh-uh. Not always. Sometimes they’re synthetic organisms created through bioengineering.
