logo Sign In

Doctor M

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Feb-2005
Last activity
4-Dec-2025
Posts
2,550

Post History

Post
#342907
Topic
Need help, captureing and converting Flash video
Time

RMC is usually a solid choice.  Isn't Camtasia just a screen recorder not a stream ripper?

Btw, I just noticed tonight that RMC has a format converter built in.  I've never tried it so I can't tell you how good it is.

Also, you may have more luck if you reinstall the previous (v9) of flash player.

Edit: I take it back.  That's no longer an issue.  v10 works fine.  Still it depends on the source you're ripping from.

Post
#342704
Topic
Need help, captureing and converting Flash video
Time

Capturing flash: Replay Media Catcher.  Hands down the best.  They have a war going with Adobe.  Whenever they think they've blocked flash rippers, Replay quickly turns out an update.

As far as converting, I'm a do it yourself kind of guy.  FLV Extract, Avisynth and lots of assumefps and convertfps sort of things.

If you don't want to spend a lot of time on each clip, you can try Riva FLV Encoder http://www.rivavx.com/index.php?encoder&L=3 or the very popular Total Video Converter: http://www.effectmatrix.com/total-video-converter/

Post
#342283
Topic
Idea: Safari 3000 (1982)
Time

Heh heh.  So I thought maybe something like TDecimate might do the job.  It gives the ability to open up the cycle size.  Typically you decimate 1 in 5 frames.  I set it to 6 in 30 to make up for the irregularity of the pattern.

No luck.  So I found a clip noticeably bad and counted frames... 90 of them.

Subtracting duplicates, the frame rate was 19 fps!!!

Crazy.  Maybe THAT'S why the movie hasn't been to DVD.

Post
#342268
Topic
Idea: Safari 3000 (1982)
Time

Tested official VHS (which definitely appears to be a different transfer) and I'm finding the same thing.

A B C D D A B B A B C D D A B C D E F F A B C C

And that's within the same scene w/o any camera cuts.

No rhyme or reason to the pattern. Using any sort of decimation makes the picture jerky as all heck.

Looks like it is staying interlaced. Ah well.

Post
#342243
Topic
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Edit Suggestions
Time

That color correction is a bit of a mixed bag.  The good ones look like you've cleaned sludge off the camera lens.  The bad ones look like you washed the color out of the scene.

Be mindful that the chase is taking place in a  jungle.  Light being filtered through the leaves shouldn't look like it's being cast by fluorescent lightbulbs.

@HeKS:  I really don't know why you're messing with that scene.  I never felt there was anything wrong with it.

Using Photoshop is a waste of time since it gets you no closer to actually editing the scene.  If you look, you can see changes in black levels/color between the wipe.  I don't know if that's in the original or your doing, but it needs to be fixed.

Finally: It is not a stretch for Indy to assume that someone who just robbed Area 51 (and made a right mess doing it), might have high-tailed it out of the neighborhood.

My guess is she's long gone too.  Don't get bogged down on the little things.

Post
#342240
Topic
Idea: Safari 3000 (1982)
Time

I don't think so.  It was telecined to 30fps just with fewer base frames.

The runtime is the same as the official tape as well.

I would think it could be a way to expand runtime (make fewer frames go farther).

It's almost like they trimmed a few minutes but wanted the runtime to be the same.  Hmm.  I may need to watch both versions side by side now.

Post
#342208
Topic
Idea: Safari 3000 (1982)
Time

For anyone following this, I was about ready to run a really slooow script to encode the capture I made.

I was disappointed to find out after running telecide that there are fewer than 24 unique frames a second.  Enough so that after decimate the picture is jittery.

This may actually look better interlaced.  Not ideal, but at least it will be smoother.

Someone needs to cap an HDTV broadcast of this somewhere.

Post
#341539
Topic
Setting proper AC3 dialog normalization
Time

Hmm. Well that clarifies things, but doesn't get me much closer to solving the problem.

Edit: Testing disc 2 (which is the one I was currently working with) and trimming the center channel to be largely dialog... I end up around -31db +/- 3db... which doesn't help if the loud passages are too loud even at -29db.

I think I'll stick with -28.  It should get my normal listening to around -27/-28 and keep the loudest from exceeding -31... I think.