logo Sign In

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Jan-2016
Last activity
1-Dec-2025
Posts
3,424

Post History

Post
#970999
Topic
Will we ever see the original trilogy released
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Fang Zei said:

There’s no way they would remove the logo and fanfare from an OUT release. They would present the movie as close as possible to how it was (at least to the layman if not nitpickers like us), and the iconic fanfare’s absence would be quite a glaring omission.

Would they even have the rights to do so?

Another thing to note is that, for the aforementioned examples of MGM/WB, Paramount/Universal, etc., the studio logo in the original opening credits still represents the studio that originally funded and PRODUCED the picture. So the logo serves primarily as a credit, not an ad for the studio. WB/Universal in these cases is the new DISTRIBUTOR and rights holder, and they’ll usually add their logo somewhere before the original film starts or before the disc menu.

In the case of 20th C. Fox, as it relates to Empire, Jedi, and the prequels, they only were the DISTRIBUTOR, not the PRODUCING studio. Any release post-2020 will have no 20th C. involvement for those films at all, either in the original production or current distribution. Having the logo on them would be quite odd indeed.

Post
#970817
Topic
Will we ever see the original trilogy released
Time

Ditto. Though it would be odd at first. Odd, but not necessarily bad. As has been said, though, there is no choice in the matter. If released digitally or after 2020 on hard media, Empire and Jedi won’t have Fox trademarks. If released on disc before 2020, they most certainly will, assuming the legal stuff doesn’t change. It’s hard to see it ever being removed from Star Wars. Fox letting that asset go seems an impossibility.

Post
#970680
Topic
Will we ever see the original trilogy released
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

nickyd47 said:

Density said:

Oh and also, keep in mind that the GOUT is widely believed to have been released in response to the prevalence of laserdisc transfer bootlegs in circulation. Now with fan preservations like Despecialized and SSE making the news, more pressure is on now than it was even then to do something about it.

I don’t think you’re reaching at all, because whenever I watch The Force Awakens, nothing about the whole movie reminds me of the prequels at all, except for when Maz Kanata says and I paraphrase “I’ve seen evil take many forms. The Sith, The Empire, today, it is The First Order.”

I don’t think the Sith line was directly prequel-related. I get what you’re saying though. The only part that made me think of the prequels was the “clone army” mention.

Even clone armies are alluded to in the OT though.

Post
#970514
Topic
Will we ever see the original trilogy released
Time

nickyd47 said:
And Disney owns Lucasfilm. Makes sense for them to not give FOX a new material they may have.
Oh man, what if we get the theatrical cuts with the truncated new Lucasfilm opening. Oh god.

Well Disney is making $ either way. Lucasfilm still gets most of the moneys from sales of existing I–VI editions, and they did even before the Disney acquisition. And as long as Fox still has the distribution rights, they’ll certainly still insist on having their logo at the beginning.

Post
#970503
Topic
Will we ever see the original trilogy released
Time

As I understand it, Fox will still get the distributor’s cut for I–VI for any release before 2020 (or thereabouts, whenever their deal ends). It’s just that the SE is the only cut they have access to to release unilaterally, and in the absence of new material from Lucasfilm, that’s what they have to release to make money from SW.

Post
#970330
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

theMaestro said:

towne32 said:

UnitéD2 said:

Is it not a combination of numerous prints, in order to obtain an image as accurate and sharp as the negative ?

Yes to the first, no to the second.

Not 100% as sharp as the negative but Mike has estimated that it’s probably 90-95% of the way there. So it’s still essentially at a much higher quality than anyone saw in theaters.

As I understand it, by using multiple prints, he has been able to isolate the negative grain, which is on every print, and preserve it, while removing the print grain, which is unique to each print, thus restoring original detail and preserving filmic quality.

Edit: by original detail, I don’t mean to original level of detail, but rather that the added detail is all original to the negative.