logo Sign In

Broom Kid

User Group
Members
Join date
3-Sep-2019
Last activity
14-Apr-2024
Posts
852

Post History

Post
#1369914
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

https://streamable.com/j4uynh

It doesn’t have to be THAT piece, is what I’m saying. It might have to be the Force Theme (which is what’s in that clip above), but the only thing it HAS to be is roughly 23 and a half seconds long from her grabbing the saber to her blocking the lightning.

Here’s another one

https://streamable.com/zd1zfq

Post
#1369849
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Rodney-2187 said:

I’ve read that the 1080p blu-ray discs included in the 4k boxed set as well as the individual 4K releases were the new scan, but the individual 1080p discs are now just the old blu-rays repackaged with the new covers. Is this true?

The 1080p blu-ray-only releases were always the 2011 discs repackaged. They came out before the 4K set and releases, and were the first release to have the new packaging. That release was seen to be a backstock-clearing exercise more than anything.

The 4K set and their accompanying 4K individual releases have the same packaging design as the preceding blu-ray-only releases, but they are the only way to get the new scans on a blu-ray disc. You HAVE to buy a 4K release in order to get the new scans on a blu-ray as a pack-in.

Post
#1369677
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

I’ve always felt that if you’re going to cut the skipping, you have to also cut the references to it. It’s counterproductive to get rid of the sequence with the hypothetical “first-time viewer” in mind and then set up a situation where the first-time viewer now has to infer and recontextualize a reference to a now-deleted sequence that, to them, never existed in the first place. The edits are supposed to streamline and improve things. Leaving in stray references to stuff and then hoping they’ll do the heavy lifting FOR you is precisely the kind of storytelling decision most fan-edits set out to fix.

If you’re cutting Lightspeed skipping, just cut all the references to it. It’s the simplest, cleanest, and best possible way to go about it.

Post
#1369483
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

StarkillerAG said:

I think you’re the only one with these complaints.

…Again, I JUST SAID THIS SAME THING in an earlier post!

I’m not even trying to get what I want, I’m just explaining (to people who are directly asking me) why I feel the way I do. I already know I’m not going to get what I want. It’s not the first time I’ve been a minority opinion on a forum before, haha. 😃 I don’t know how many other ways to say that even when I don’t get what I want, I’m still going to enjoy what I do get, and I’m thankful and appreciative of the work (98% of which I think is spot on) that makes it available.

( But just because I give voice to the minority opinion doesn’t mean I won’t be proven right later, either 😉 )

No music playing in the scene at all, like you suggest, would just be weird and jarring for such a climactic moment.

OK, I don’t think I’d agree, but I do know that “weird and jarring” is exactly how I felt upon hearing that insertion of “Burning Homestead” for the third time into that scene. But I get it! Diff’rent strokes to rule the world (Hmmmmmmm).

Post
#1369478
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

Octorox said:

The prequels used tracked music constantly. I don’t think it’s really that big an issue.

I just said it’s not that big an issue, LOL.

But: trying to use the prequels (often frequently terrible) tracking practices as a positive example for anything doesn’t play well, for me. And again, I’m not even arguing against the practice of tracking music. I’ve said multiple times now that the tracking of Burning Homestead in TFA worked. It’s the specific choice to use this single, already re-tracked cue again, and the way that re-tracked music is awkwardly inserted into the mix. On a technical level, it’s not good. On a thematic level, it’s threadbare and on-the-nose.

Usually, if Williams wrote music for a scene, it’s probably best to stick with what he wrote for that scene, or use nothing at all.

Post
#1369471
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

It’s definitely off. It doesn’t seem to be in the wrong key. It’s in the wrong key with the music surrounding it. The transition is off both going into and coming out of the tracked music.

Anyway, that’s my complaint with it. But my complaint is only worth so much, and it’s mostly only mine, so… hey! Honestly, the only reason I’m still hitting it is become someone directly asked. But after this, there’s really no reason to explain it again!

I still think the absence of music might work better than anything. But "Burning Homestead’ for a third time is just… it’s not good. In fact, I can’t think of a single piece of music that’s ever been directly tracked into as many key moments as that one will have been for this edit. It’s pushing it to do that TWICE.

Post
#1369459
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

What’s the issue with burning homestead again? It’s a nice callback to the first time Rey embraces the Force,

It’s an on-the-nose and now-overused callback, period. It was “nice callback” in TFA, and the repurposing of that specific rendition of the Force Theme (which probably shouldn’t have worked in that spot considering what it was intended to be scoring, and what Williams had actually scored for that moment) worked for THAT moment.

But for this moment, it’s so blatantly self-referential, and essentially a “Member-Berries” type insertion that it can’t help but pull focus from what’s happening, to what’s being EDITED, which is death for a fan-edit. It’s always a delicate tightrope to walk when your’e fan-editing, but “Burning Homestead” specifically - not the Force Theme, but that specific version of it - isn’t really doing anything but calling attention to itself as being a super-obvious echo of a better moment from a better movie, instead of actually scoring the feeling of the movie we’re all currently watching.

That’s my issue with it. I think it might be better to just let the moment stand starkly with no music at all than to keep trying to track in old music for that moment. I wonder if there’s a way to extend what Williams actually scored for that exact moment, too, but otherwise - Burning Homestead in that sequence just plays to me like fanservice, not dramatic payoff.

And again, the edit in the scene currently is in the wrong key, and isn’t merged well with the surrounding music cues on top of that.

Post
#1369426
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

StarkillerAG said:

Problem is, that music piece from TFA’s credits was already used in this edit, for the ending on Tatooine. I think that music is pretty much perfect in it’s current position, so I wouldn’t want to revert it back to the reused Force theme that was in the original movie.

Oh definitely, it was just an example of how much editing/changing would need to be done to make something fit there. That piece (a live performance by a completely different orchestra too) had to be pitched down a full step, stretched about 120%, and then the following piece that connects the edit to the Palpatine theme also needed to be timestretched and rearranged. All that to get less than 30 seconds of music to fit there, haha.

I’m thinking some remixed version of Rey’s theme would be the best fit for the ghost scene. I’m gonna look on YouTube to see if there’s any versions of the theme that fit the moment.

I think a version of the Jedi Steps might also work. But I also think NOTHING might work best too. Just thunder, lightning, echoes, breathing and the force ghosts flickering in and out of view.

Post
#1369408
Topic
Info: Mike Verta’s 4K Restoration - May 2020 Livestream
Time

That doesn’t answer the question in the hypothetical though, and that’s a question that absolutely would have been asked by basically anyone in the company thinking of agreeing to this vague “deal.” I simply don’t believe they were ever going to seriously consider using Verta’s single restoration of 1/3rd of a trilogy. It just doesn’t make any sense in terms of logistics.

Are we really to think 2020 was the last time we’ll see a new release of these movies?

On physical media? Sure. If only because I believe they’re trying to push people who want catalog product to Disney+ and Hulu.

They’re issuing DCPs of the 2011 blu-ray cuts to theaters and drive-ins now. They’re going to premiere Mulan on Disney+ for an added fee, and they’ll probably do the same for Black Widow later in the year if Mulan turns a profit (and it likely will). Disney is preparing for the death of theaters. They’re not really looking to save them - They’ve been doing THAT for the past 10 years already, and it ended up not really mattering in the face of this pandemic.

Stuff like an offical original theatrical Star Wars Trilogy restoration is absolutely going to be something they use to drive subscriptions to streaming, not to drive people to the movie theater. That’s the future we’re looking at.

Post
#1369404
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

It’s like a math problem as much as it is a tone and feeling problem. You only have about 23 seconds or so to find a piece that evokes the right emotion, flows with the scene, and is in the right key. Which means you’re probably gonna have to edit, cut, and stretch other pieces to make that all work.

Here’s a low-res, and lo-fi mockup I did.

https://streamable.com/j2hvqr

Post
#1369381
Topic
Info: Mike Verta’s 4K Restoration - May 2020 Livestream
Time

I think them licensing the OT to a boutique home video company like Criterion or ShoutFactory is unlikely as well, but it’s a couple degrees more likely than letting a fan-restoration become official product. IF an official release of the original theatrical versions ever happens again, they’ll do their own restoration work in-house (if it’s not already done) and they’ll put it on Disney+ as a bonus feature. They won’t re-release it in theaters or put it on disc. If you want the original theatrical versions in 4K, they’ll be there, and you gotta pay 6.99 a month to watch them legally.

Post
#1369371
Topic
Info: Mike Verta’s 4K Restoration - May 2020 Livestream
Time

It probably wouldn’t even take that much effort. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s already done, they just haven’t said anything about it, mostly because they don’t have any actual plans to do anything with it.

I have always found it highly doubtful there was ever a time when Lucasfilm was honestly considering using Verta’s restoration. I couldn’t explain why they supposedly took a meeting with him to discuss that restoration other than I’m sure someone cashed in a friendly favor, but I just don’t think it was ever going to happen.

The premise was always sort of self-defeating, for one thing: They don’t want to spend money on a restoration, so they’ll just license (? if that’s even the right term) a fan’s. OK. But if they were willing to go any sort of licensing route, why would they be talking to Verta instead of any other film company (namely, Criterion) who would be more than willing to PAY THEM for the opportunity to do it instead of the other way around. And then lets say this restoration is financially successful: They either got for free, or paid a small fee to use, Verta’s restoration and then hypothetically made a bunch of money on it. There’s still two other films in the trilogy that are completely unrestored now. Do we just only have the restored Star Wars and that’s it? Where do the other two restorations come from? How long do people have to wait to get them? Who is paying who to do them?

If ever there was going to be a restoration that became salable product, it was only ever going to be done in-house, or a licensed deal with a third party company who could do all three at once to a consistent level, and who would likely be willing to pay a decent price for the opportunity to do it.

And honestly, if they were ever going to make whatever restoration efforts a salable product intended for the consumer market, THAT’S probably when you’d see a bunch copyright strikes, DMCA takedowns, and the sorts of actions that we’ve been afraid of for over 20 years now. I think we’ll have a good idea if and when a original theatrical versions is actually coming to market because the fan-restoration “market” will get noticeably disrupted ahead of time.

Post
#1369253
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

Hey, I prefaced it with “Last grasp at straws” and it’s been literally MONTHS since I last brought it up, LOL. The endgame is close and even though it’s likely not going to go our way here, I don’t think there’s any harm to making that last grasp, and I’d hope there’s no hard feelings. I can say there’s no ill will intended on my part, and I’m not going to be mad if the hail mary gets deflected out of bounds. I expect it, and I’m still looking forward to sitting down in front of the final product (or one of the versions of the final product, if the Rey Nobody edit is still on its way).

It’s one final bit of feedback before last call, is all. If anything, it says a lot about the amount of work, time, energy, and results that this thread has shown to everyone reading it that of all the changes, cuts, and additions to the movie being made by the fans here, that the only two things that still stand out ot me as “fixable” are those two things. That’s a hell of a better ratio than the ACTUAL RELEASED FILM had. 😃

Post
#1369250
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

I watched the whole opening section that way to try it out and it felt rushed to me.

I don’t understand how it could feel rushed when there’s no actual RUSHING happening, as opposed to the Mustafar Minute, which is nothing but 15 bad cuts and a bunch of audio/visual mess shoved inbetween them. The pacing from Kylo jumping into Exegol’s orbit up until the end of that scene with Palpatine is fairly slow and measured. Things are happening, but they’re happening in an orderly, interesting fashion, as opposed to the jumble of disconnected and inarguably confusing images that is the whole of Mustafar - a whole that is ultimately meaningless in the larger storytelling context.

Leaving Mustafar in doesn’t offset TROS’ “breakneck” pace, it contributes to it (it sets the film’s tone, honestly), because it’s a bunch of visual junk “storytelling” with all of the point and purpose cut out of it, happening right up front, for little-to-no narrative return. It’s part of why the movie FEELS breakneck and exhausting overall - because the first thing you’re exposed to is sloppy editing of disjointed imagery going for a couple minutes straight before it actually settles down and STARTS THE STORY on Exegol.

Oh, and one last (Columbo-esque) thing - if we’re still poking around for music changes, I think sticking with Burning Homestead for Rey and the Force Ghosts is a mistake. It doesn’t fit either tonally OR musically (it’s in the wrong key and transitions poorly, just on a technical level) and of all the music choices made, it’s the one that seems the most stereotypically “Fan-edit”-esque. It’s going to the easy fanservice well nakedly, and one time too many. Better NO music for that moment than the second tracked re-usage of Burning Homestead.

Post
#1369243
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

2016 Ghostbusters was… okay. It should have been funnier.

Then again, that goes for Ghostbusters 2, and basically everything ever Ghosbustered since 1984.

…fwiw, last grasp at the straws of a request: I think the best possible opening to Rise of Skywalker is to just cut from the opening crawl to Kylo jumping in to frame in front of the nebula. Excise Mustafar entirely. It’s pointless, confusing, ugly, and mostly meaningless. The jump-in is cleaner, and honestly way more in keeping with Star Wars tradition (pan down to ship on the way to a planet - not to that enemy ship parked over it waiting for a bad and incongruous cut to that planets surface before immediately jumping back into space again)

I understand that people think leaving the Mustafar Minute in has some worth, but I figure since everyone else is asking for under-the-wire changes and additions to this edit, I should go on record one last time as saying this one edit will engender so much more goodwill than any post-production attempts to save the Mustafar Minute without any of the actual meat that segment needs to justify itself (the Oracle, Vader’s Castle). Just start already on the way to Exegol. It’s so much more clean and purposeful from a storytelling AND a filmmaking perspective than throwing more globs of clay at the broken, misshapen vase that is this movie’s ungainly opening on Mustafar.

I also understand this won’t happen, but I figure one last hail mary attempt at getting it out there wouldn’t hurt. 😃

Post
#1368783
Topic
What is your main way of watching the Original Trilogy?
Time

Now that the trilogy is finished, I gotta say the D+ versions by Oohteedee are definitely the go-tos. Maybe the stuff Harmy and Dre are cooking up for Despecialized v3 will top that due to the combo of Dre’s grades and Harmys abilities with mattes, rotoscoping, etc… but for now, using the 4K UHDs as the base and the 4K77/80/83 raw scans as the sources for replacement shots/scenes:

Star Wars D+77 v2.3
Empire D+80 v2.2
Jedi OTD83 v1.0

That’s the OT for me for the foreseeable future. Despecialized might change that, but these versions are as good as the original Star Wars has ever looked and sounded on home video.

Post
#1368139
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

But nothing past DVD, right?

I didn’t even click on the tile when I saw it, I just figured it’d be at best an upscale of the original DVD release, but I guess it’s full-on 4K.

This (and Fang’s post above) lends credence to the idea that they’re not going to do anything with their catalog on physical media. They’ll restore their movies and give them new 4K transfers, but it definitely seems like they want you to see them on their platform, and not on a disc.

Post
#1368131
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Haha! I was pretty surprised to actually see it on Disney+ when I was scrolling thru the other day. I thought for sure they were going to try burying the evidence of it ever having existed, but there it was! And it turns out the only thing I actually remember about the movie is John Byner voicing Gurgi (munchies and crunchies!)

Oh wow, just checked - apparently it’s available in 4K HDR10 there. I didn’t even know until just now.

Post
#1368124
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

I believe that’s the case, yeah: If you buy the individual 4K releases, you get the new blu-ray pressing as a pack-in w/ the new 4K disc. But since the individual blu-ray-only releases came out BEFORE the 4K releases (before they were even announced, I think?) those discs are just repackaged 2011 blu-rays.

The covers, aside from the top banner saying whether it’s a 4K UHD or blu-ray only release, are identical otherwise.

Post
#1368118
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

StarkillerAG said:

Keep in mind those are only available in the box with the 4K, the individual releases are still the 2011 version.

Have we ever gotten confirmation of that? Only one source said that, and it only said it was a rumor, so I’m not sure.

I believe that’s correct: the new masters on blu-ray are only included as a pack-in on the 4K UHD releases (either the full box or the individual titles). The discs in the blu-ray only release are from 2011. I believe there is no way to buy the new masters on blu-ray unless you are buying the 4K discs.

The UK blu-ray only Skywalker Saga box that was talked about frequently in this thread before the release might be different, but I don’t know that anyone who bought that one (the Wal-Mart link that kept getting posted was essentially a link to import the UK set) has written about it since they got it.

Post
#1368086
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

LexX said:
Even VHS tapes are now in high demand on crappy films that don’t have any later releases. Just wait and see.

But those companies aren’t re-releasing VHS tapes to respond to that secondary market demand. You seem to be suggesting that because old, dead media fetches a high price on the resale market due to scarcity, it’s a no brainer that Disney will re-release that media.

If Disney is really deciding to call it a day with physical media releases for catalog product, as the report states, the used market gouging itself isn’t going to be justification for their starting it back up again a decade later, I don’t think. In 10 years what’s a little more likely is that physical releases end up occupying the same collector’s niche that vinyl and cassettes occupy now, IF that. But considering what the last 10 years of home entertainment has looked like, barring a significant disruption of internet access worldwide, it seems pretty clear that physical media distribution isn’t going to enjoy a renaissance, especially not if one of its major producers decides they’re done with it for the most part.

Haarspalter said:

Too M-U-C-H assumptions. Move along.

How was that post “assumptive?” I’m speaking on the report I shared. I didn’t file the report, or do the reporting, so I’m not trying to make a bunch of declarative, concrete statements, because I don’t have the firsthand knowledge to do so. Why is that worthy of criticism? And what other way SHOULD there be a conversation about things you don’t have firsthand access to?

Post
#1367914
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

LexX said:

While that may be true for now, it can change easily.

If they’re moving forward with discontinuing the release of catalog titles (or possibly licensing those titles to boutique labels) they obviously don’t believe there’s much money here. Disney could “cash in” now if they want, and they don’t. They sent the Skywalker Saga set out to die, basically, and they hardly promote any of the new releases they do have. Physical media is dying and it seems like Disney has decided to (pun intended) let it go. It seems very, very much like they’re going to address the “do you want to own something from our catalog” situation by pointing people to Disney+. That’s the “cash-in” they’re pursuing.

If Mulan clears a profit (and it might be able to considering Disney doesn’t have to share any of that revenue with anyone, so the amount of money it needs to gross is much smaller) it seems like Disney+ is going to be how they move forward for everything. The physical media audience is niche enough that they don’t need to cater to it anymore, so they won’t. They’ll maybe accept money from some boutique label to press up limited edition blu-rays, but I wouldn’t be surprised if those licenses aren’t cheap and so whatever hopes of a Criterion-esque (or even Criterion) release of Disney/Fox classics will be limited. That’s if Disney decides to let those titles be licensed.

Piracy really isn’t that much of a concern to the bottom line, and hasn’t been for long while. It’s been more of a boogeyman than an actual threat to business, especially not to any business the size of Disney. Pirated copies of Hamilton and Black is King aren’t even denting Disney’s subscription numbers, for example.

I think if there are hopes for a future Star Wars release that maybe someday possibly involves an official release of the theatrical versions, that release is going to be on Disney+. It’ll be a bonus feature they add one day. This announcement seems to be pointing that way.

Post
#1367896
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

This probably isn’t a great sign when it comes to any future physical releases of Star Wars

https://thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/080720-1600

The article makes room for possible Star Wars releases still, but it really sounds like Disney’s about done with physical media, period. No catalog releases going forward. No promotion for the catalog releases they’ve already got.

If you were waiting for a 50th/60th anniversary box-set, you might never stop waiting.