Bossk

User Group: Members
Join date: 10-Mar-2003
Last activity: 13-Jan-2008
Posts: 9,501

Post History

Post: #23882
Topic: Non-Star Wars discussions and adult chat - please restrict to Off Topic forum
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23882/action/topic#23882
Time: 7-Nov-2003 3:43 AM

Uh oh, the Lawyer Strikes Back.

Post: #23781
Topic: Original Memories Vs. New Nightmare
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23781/action/topic#23781
Time: 6-Nov-2003 11:49 AM

Oink, oink, my good man.

Post: #23711
Topic: Original Memories Vs. New Nightmare
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23711/action/topic#23711
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:47 AM

That's what I would be referring to as well. But reading where others were going in this thread, I don't think that's what they intended.

Post: #23709
Topic: Star Wars Insider
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23709/action/topic#23709
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:45 AM

All I saw were the ones listed with the Croc Hunter one. I'll have to look more closely.

Post: #23708
Topic: Non-Star Wars discussions and adult chat - please restrict to Off Topic forum
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23708/action/topic#23708
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:44 AM

HEY! Watch it buck-o.

Post: #23682
Topic: Petetions are running low
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23682/action/topic#23682
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:08 AM

Gotta keep each other on our toes.

Post: #23681
Topic: Original Memories Vs. New Nightmare
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23681/action/topic#23681
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:08 AM

But fur is not clothing. Clothing is anything extra that is worn on top of whatever naturally occuring body covering you already have (be it skin or body hair). So, fur is not clothing to an Ewok. That's where the comments in this thread were going about wearing nothing but Ewok "clothing" as a Halloween costume being a bit "revealing". And, for the record, it wasn't me who made mention of that first.

Post: #23679
Topic: Can we get other directors in on the crusade?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23679/action/topic#23679
Time: 6-Nov-2003 6:06 AM

I don't know, man. Sounds like you volunteered to me.

Post: #23673
Topic: Star Wars Insider
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23673/action/topic#23673
Time: 6-Nov-2003 5:51 AM

Just checked out his Lego films. They need a bit of help. I saw a few SW Lego films that were linked off of fbtb.net and they were hilarious. Maybe these would have been better if I had seen them first. But after seeing the SW Lego films, these ones just paled. Haven't checked out the rest of his site but it seems to be dedicated to gaming. Am I right?

Post: #23672
Topic: Non-Star Wars discussions and adult chat - please restrict to Off Topic forum
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23672/action/topic#23672
Time: 6-Nov-2003 5:45 AM

always.

Post: #23591
Topic: Can we get other directors in on the crusade?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23591/action/topic#23591
Time: 5-Nov-2003 11:04 AM

I definitely want in on this one. Odds are that access to Kurosawa's spirit are being blocked by they very pissed off spirit of Toshiro Mifune. Mifune, armed and pissed, hells no... Will Kevlar stop a katana?

Post: #23575
Topic: custom banner
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23575/action/topic#23575
Time: 5-Nov-2003 8:39 AM

Whoops, my bad.

Post: #23574
Topic: Non-Star Wars discussions and adult chat - please restrict to Off Topic forum
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23574/action/topic#23574
Time: 5-Nov-2003 8:39 AM

No prob, buddy.

Post: #23533
Topic: custom banner
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23533/action/topic#23533
Time: 5-Nov-2003 5:47 AM

Motti's very lucky to have me gettin' his back. Right, Motti?

Post: #23532
Topic: Star Wars Insider
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23532/action/topic#23532
Time: 5-Nov-2003 5:47 AM

Hawuttah?

Post: #23531
Topic: You have our support
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23531/action/topic#23531
Time: 5-Nov-2003 5:47 AM

Not a problem, my friend.

Post: #23530
Topic: Non-Star Wars discussions and adult chat - please restrict to Off Topic forum
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/23530/action/topic#23530
Time: 5-Nov-2003 5:46 AM

Yes, he was speaking on our behalf. Much like a lawyer would when he is defending a murderer. The lawyer isn't necessarily a murderer as well. Just speaking for him.

Thank you, DA Motti.