Bossk

User Group: Members
Join date: 10-Mar-2003
Last activity: 13-Jan-2008
Posts: 9,501

Post History

Post: #34836
Topic: It's just marketing... wait a while.
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34836/action/topic#34836
Time: 24-Feb-2004 6:54 AM

That it is. But it is also probably the hardest ideal to break a person free of.

Post: #34809
Topic: Out of town...
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34809/action/topic#34809
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:36 AM

But he's back now! Yay! Now if we can just wake him from his alcohol-induced coma to start posting again...

Post: #34808
Topic: Widescreen Advocate Supports Original Trilogy.com
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34808/action/topic#34808
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:35 AM

Welcome aboard Josh.

Post: #34807
Topic: Beautiful Women
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34807/action/topic#34807
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:32 AM

Howsabout Marisa Coughlin of SuperTroopers?

Okay, since my image link didn't work, here's a link to IMDb's Marisa Coughlin photo gallery... Marisa Coughlin

Post: #34804
Topic: Whats your dream DVD?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34804/action/topic#34804
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:27 AM

I remember that game. I kept hoping for some secret code to come up in it.

How cool would it be for a movie that had a game come out for it on, say, the old Ataris or Colecovisions to release emulator versions of the game as a DVD-ROM special feature on the DVD?

Post: #34803
Topic: NFL
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34803/action/topic#34803
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:26 AM

Stuff like that happens when Green Bay comes to town. What's sad though is that Bears fans view the Pack as their archrival. However, Packers fans, since the Bears haven't really given them much of a fight in recent years, view the Vikings more as their archrival.

Post: #34802
Topic: DISNEY TO BUY MUPPETS
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34802/action/topic#34802
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:25 AM

Yeah, me neither.

Post: #34801
Topic: MY COMPUTER HAS A FIRST NAME. IT'S...
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34801/action/topic#34801
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:24 AM

Now if only I can get the workplace to pay for it.

Post: #34800
Topic: must play games
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34800/action/topic#34800
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:23 AM

Bastards. However, if it's PC, then it might come out for Mac as well. Sometimes, game producers consider "PC" a term that just means Personal Computer and not specifically related to IBM PCs. I've seen games that they say are for PCs and they have Mac versions as well. So, if not PS2, then maybe Mac.

Post: #34796
Topic: battle star Galatica
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34796/action/topic#34796
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:02 AM

1978-79 was the only season it was out. Then they had Galactica 2000 or some such that was part of a season in 1980 but not with all the same cast members. You only want to watch the main season. If it doesn't have Starbuck of Apollo, you don't want to bother.

Post: #34795
Topic: EVERYTHING HARRY POTTER
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34795/action/topic#34795
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:00 AM

Nope, not yet.

Post: #34794
Topic: Daredevil 2
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34794/action/topic#34794
Time: 24-Feb-2004 4:00 AM

Probably Shimmy. The movie had it's moments for me. But I won't be upset if I never see it again.

Dayv, your quote was from Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.

Post: #34787
Topic: Discussion: What do you guys think of the Unleashed figures?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34787/action/topic#34787
Time: 24-Feb-2004 3:49 AM

Let me know what you do (or don't) find.

Post: #34785
Topic: Screen captures of the trilogy?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34785/action/topic#34785
Time: 24-Feb-2004 3:48 AM

Can you list what images you have available?

Post: #34784
Topic: It's just marketing... wait a while.
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34784/action/topic#34784
Time: 24-Feb-2004 3:47 AM

So, if he wants to avoid potential embarassment, just do what you said, Cyprus, box them both together and sell it that way only. Then you don't have to worry about one outselling the other.

Post: #34782
Topic: ship guide for sci-fi geeks
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34782/action/topic#34782
Time: 24-Feb-2004 3:42 AM

I still prefer the battle worn ships from the OT to the glamorous cruisers of the PT, though. Something endearing about carbon scoring.

Post: #34707
Topic: Whats your dream DVD?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34707/action/topic#34707
Time: 23-Feb-2004 11:22 AM

That it did. And very well, I might add.

Post: #34706
Topic: Daredevil 2
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34706/action/topic#34706
Time: 23-Feb-2004 11:21 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: GundarkHunter
Bad, but still not as bad as Cat in the Hat or Bad Boys II.

Thankfully, I never saw either so, in my eyes, UG truly are the first two letters in "ugly".

Cat in the Hat got a Golden Suck award from my website, so I never bothered with it.

Post: #34705
Topic: We should've protested years ago
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34705/action/topic#34705
Time: 23-Feb-2004 11:19 AM

And how much did they lose in the investment?

Post: #34676
Topic: EVERYTHING HARRY POTTER
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34676/action/topic#34676
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:53 AM

Hey, that solid gold kewpie's gonna look pretty damn cool on my desk. I'll be expecting to see it in the mail, Gundark!

Post: #34674
Topic: NFL
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34674/action/topic#34674
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:50 AM

Nah, the Bears are America's Team!!!!

Post: #34673
Topic: Daredevil 2
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34673/action/topic#34673
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:49 AM

Daredevil was pretty bad, but I actually saw the worst movie of 2003 the other day... Uptown Girls. Yikes!

Post: #34671
Topic: Whats your dream DVD?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34671/action/topic#34671
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:48 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: Luke Skywalker
SWEET!
I thought that movie was a total unknown...
Jack Flak rules!!
hehe

Maybe it's unknown outside of the two of us. Actually three since my brother used to watch it with me. Loved that flick and Russkies.

Post: #34670
Topic: For Sale & Help: Star Wars Original Trilogy not SE on ebay 3388567496
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34670/action/topic#34670
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:47 AM

I'd help you out Banthabomb but I'm not a big fan of PayPal and, thus, I don't have a way to outbid and pay for it. Sorry.

They are DVDs, yes. But are they DVD-R or what? Obviously it cannot be a professionally produced DVD since it's pirated, so what kind of burn is it?

Post: #34669
Topic: Why doesn't Lucus just release both versions?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/34669/action/topic#34669
Time: 23-Feb-2004 9:43 AM

Quote
Originally posted by: dcsantangelo2005
Rebel Scum said that Lucas is worried that the OV Ot will outsell the SE and I don't see why Lucas wouldn't release the OV. It would make him ten times as more than the SE and would make him even richer than he already is. I don't understand why he wouldn't release the OV OT is it some kind of sick power trip?

It's the pride factor taking hold. Lucas is exceptionally proud of where he is now able to take the trilogy due to technology that his company has helped perfect. And he's a huge proponent of the digitization of the filmmaking process as a whole. For an old, film-based copy of his movies that don't rely on digital SFX to sell better than his "pure vision" would be a major source of humiliation to the great bearded one. He does not want to take that chance. Why give him a chance to be proven wrong by the hording masses? Play it safe and be able to say that the OV OT is not better than the SE by eliminating any chance of being proven wrong.