Angel

Nicholas J. Michalak said:

Also, Qui-Gon's name is not stated until he introduces himself to Shmi Skywalker nearly 40 minutes into the film. For Obi-Wan, I believe his name is next stated 50 minutes into the film when Qui-Gon asks for a midichlorian count on Anakin's blood.

Nope. Qui gon says the name Obi wan after they enter the conference room door. so at the very start we know who is Six licond eco.

But since we go with your edit continuity i think you are right :)

Prohtagoanist is the key that is missing right?

-Angel

mrbenja0618 said:

 You solved my 1st problem with this movie. However, 1 of MANY! lol

"Making the prequels watchable, one frame at a time"

;)

-Angel

Well let me say it again. Stylisticaly correct. Leia points up so it could be confusing (even that space is 3d) that we see executor's top view

Again once again a superb analysis there Imp fighter. I even like to suggest ady can place your posts to the extras so we can all see the deep analysis from shot to shot and how ESB:R came out :D

-Angel

hah.. If you notice tho when viceroy yells "close the blast doors" we see the same shot from different angle when he says "that will hold them" The shot of turning back is identical..

-Angel

Nicholas J. Michalak said:

Here's my opening for TPM.  Should prove interesting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWio0Bbu5lE

-NJM

Indeed! I like the idea of the smokes being from the explosion.. A far more faster paced opening for sure

Keep these ideas coming!

-Angel

Happy Birthday adywan even delayed (sorry)

Happy birthday asterisk8 even a day before (sorry)

-Angel

SomethingStarWarsRelated said:

just a few ideas for TPM when Padme meets Anakin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7pRGItz8vE

Does it matter?

I really cant wait to see a final edit of yours! I really really really love what you did there. Its amazing how awesome can some re arangements can do so big impact!

Great work again as always :D

-Angel

Lobot is here..and then my ears got crazy...

Lobot

I hope ady "strongly" consider to put these in the edit :P :P :P

-Angel

gurgle1624 said:

Be gentle with your comments on my edit, its my first

Well make sure you can Edit your post instead making 3 in a row ;)

-Angel

Or we can assume after that concept that Luke indeed defeated vader without his anger rather the saying of palps :) No sith eyes for him ;)

-Angel

mfastx said:

But I want to ask: why you are changing Boba Fett's voice from the SE?  Because all of your changes have to do with consistancy, and this changes just cancels out the consistancy established by the PT. 

Also, on a side note, I wish (I know I'm probably the only one on here that does) that you would keep Vader's shuttle going back with the Executor.  I agree with you about changing his line to "bring my shuttle," but when the SE shows Vader's shuttle, it just looks cool, those are my favorite Star Wars aircraft.  Plus the music from the scene fits perfectly with that shot.  I just want to know why you are scrapping that, I'm sure there's a good reason. 

PT should follow OT not the other way around. Ady said that Jango and clones will get an other voice when PT:R is on the works.

The suttle is gone for sure because we dont need to see it happening while it brakes the pacing of the pursuit :)

-Angel

Imagine then replacing each "lens flare" with a "lens maul"

-Lensed Angel

haraldo23 said:

Darth Maul was the only good thing about TPM. The way he looks should not be changed IMHO.

What exactly was good on him? what was his purpose? Or maybe it had in his face a big word "COOL FACTOR"

-Angel

gurgle1624 said:

Any news on the missing scene on Hoth, ya know the echo station 38 being blown to bits by the Imp. Probe?  And before anyone say's it...its not EU, it's in the official comic adaption and the draft. Shouldn't be too hard to intertwine into that scene (well not hard for Adywan) otherwise Han saying "It isnt too friendly..." makes no sense as there is nothing to base that assumption on just by hearing the electronic broadcasts from the probot.

A little green screen, some snow, a model or two, some visual effects and ta da!! A scene!  Yeah I make it sound easy, and yes I know it's much more involved than that but how cool would that scene be?

Comics and drafts that not following or expanding the currect state of movie(s) is EU. what they showed to us as final product it is the final reference.

If its (sounds) so simple why not showing us what you mean? ;)

-Angel

DuTwan said:

Angel anychance you could possibly have a go at taking out the colour out of palpatines 'evil face' and making it paler like ROTJ style and replace the yellow eyes with normal eyes?

Palpatine was iconic. Even he was very little in ROTJ he was more memorable from the timefiller maul.

As redletter media said the characters from ep 1 to two are whole different persons. thats why i dont know how the idea maul - grievous can work as Bingo suggested. Maul never speaks. GG is speaking all the time.

So id rather make normal palp with evil eyes rather the opposite ;)

-Angel

Here is some facts. Assuming always.

in OT we have a dude with a mask, never see his eyes and an old lady with yellow eyes. Both their face are white/gray and damaged/deformed. Assuming have an old lady palpatine with yellow eyes it could make contrast with his weak appearance.

In PT we have a tattoo guy, a droid general and a fallen jedi plus anakin.

Maul has evil orange red eyes that complete his appereance as...evil.

then we have dooku that got nothing. and GG that is a lizard cat eyed creature.

Now we got explained by PT that the "masks" have fall from palpatine's face and now he cant hide it anymore.

Mixing up an element that was not used properly even its from bad script of from  visuals yes it might cause confusion. And again we dont know what a "zabraak species" is. Taking reference from games that was set on something wrong its naturally it will cause confusion and debates

A solution is that only palps can have the eyes before and after his transformation, or add partial hits of sith eyes here and there to all the bad guys. A bit of evil something that gains someone when is in rage.. Yes you can make the difference adding the sith eyes to known jedi puting the dilema who is good after all. Or may have them indeed keepers of the peace and never fall into darkness.(aka blade runner you never know)

Or indeed dooku for example can get a desaturation/pale tone to show that he is a "sith". Anakin too.

As i said before each editor sets its own rules and aesthetics to their edits. It might be star wars-y or not. which defies all the above sayings ;)

-Angel

Farlander said:

As far as I understand, the Sith eyes appeared for Darth Maul as means to make him cool and menacing (I wouldn't call Palpatine's eyes in RotJ Sith eyes... they're relatively normal). Then, in 2003-2004 (AFTER AotC, mind you) KotOR games have been released, where those who follow the Dark Side slowly change appearance (most notably the eyes).

Nah.. he is cool even without the sith eyes ;)

The concept can work

-Angel

With all the good detail that Ady and Ming provide us from the pics of props we can assume that the new shots will include close ups as well?

Considering the fact that distant objects does not require detail..

Also a known tip is to make the suits already used and old rather brand new. The aging process makes them more interesting rright?

Oh well. I've got to admit that it does look a little plain. I kind of like this type of design for the generator but without the red markings:

hah makes sense :P

-Angel

Perhaps they could gradually appear more and more with each shot of Anakin right after Obi-Wan is crushed?

A vampir.... A sith i meant make his teeth also bigger :D

Well a good idea is that anakin has no more sith eyes when the vader mask enters so actually he is not a sith but just a wretched reminent body.

-Angel

Nicholas J. Michalak said:

 So, maybe the set needs to be altered digitally, as has been extensively discussed, in order for this to be possible.  Ideas, anyone?

-NJM

Make the room more dark ;) If you dont know how big is something better hide it better

-Angel

Edit:

I was wrong :P

move along

-Angel

Flashbacks dont work on Star wars im afraid.

Vader's transformation will be replaced with robotchicken's one

-Angel

Joshua_Blue said:

You are forgetting about mass! Newton's second law: F= m*a => a=F/m. This means the bigger mass of the object, the lower the acceleration with the same force applied. Mass inertia is applicable in space too ;)

I can listen sounds on space! I want a law for that too

-Angel

Again different things between shots..

There are more differences than the 3 i point but is hard to show them..

-Angel

Good point. I stand corrected.

Still its the same set there. At least some variation.. I might work on that

-Angel