logo Sign In

ADigitalMan

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Sep-2004
Last activity
30-Oct-2025
Posts
2,947
Web Site
https://www.youtube.com/@DigitalMan-jc3xy

Post History

Post
#76018
Topic
Info Wanted: What other LDs are you all transferring?
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/76018/action/topic#76018
Time
Actually, I'm not doing any LD transfers (as I don't own any myself). I'm just geeking out from the sidelines. What's amazing is how much of the tech talk about LD captures and transfers I'm following and more importantly, comprehending, since I've never actually done one myself.

A good friend of mine is a Laserphile and I try to scrounge up a good rare laserdisc for him every year around Christmas time. He's built a fairly impressive library of OOP (i.e. OOP on VHS and DVD) titles. I know he has Kong, a bunch of Rush LDs, a bunch of great Disney classics and, of course, the DE of the OT.
Post
#76021
Topic
The Next Superman
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/76021/action/topic#76021
Time
Yep. Jon Peters is still attached. I do think he's been sidelined, and with Singer's previous attachments to Richard Donner (via X-men, and Donner's wife on X2) he's much more interested in preserving the films' mythos. (That said, I'd rather have seen Millar and Gough take Smallville to the big screen; I don't know WHY Tom Welling wasn't cast, because poll after poll showed the public wanting him to don the tights and cape). But I digress ... back to Jon Peters: The second paragraph of the official press release dated 10-22-2004 on Routh's casting announcment confirms:

Quote
The untitled Superman movie is expected to begin principal photography in Australia early next year for release in summer, 2006. It is produced by Jon Peters, Bryan Singer and Gilbert Adler from a screenplay by Michael Dougherty & Dan Harris. No other casting has been announced.


Bring on those frickin' polar bears and the gay Jimmy Olsen. As Homer Simpson suggested "All this movie needs is a robotic pie."
Post
#75855
Topic
***The MeBeJedi feedback thread ***
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75855/action/topic#75855
Time
FINALLY! I figured how to open in PowerDVD (I had to download the latest version and run the trial). Brightness issue not withstanding, it does look very good. Far crisper than the five-star 1997 SE discs, for certain. That said, I know you're doing some work to them, and I look forward to a side-by-side comparison of the straight capture vs the retouched version.

Until the official DVD came out, I never in all my hundreds of viewings noticed all of the green flashes during the saber duel. They come in well in your capture too, but not to the obnoxious level they are on the DVD.
Post
#75804
Topic
***The MeBeJedi feedback thread ***
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75804/action/topic#75804
Time
Yeah. Not so much to compress for downloading, but to change the file type. I've found that browsers rarely screw with the binary data being transmitted in a zip file. Unfortunately, IE loves to screw up multimedia files for no tangible reason. It's not a major problem, but when it is a problem, it's usually pretty chronic. I can probably count on my hands the number of times I've seen this problem on my end, but zipping the source has always worked well for fixing the problem.

If you can't do that at the source, no bother though. I think I'll fire up the trusty ol' Netscape 4.7, who treats file downloads nicely almost always, even if it makes pages look like ass.

Update:
I downloaded with Netscape but still had the same problem. It's gotta be my Windows Media player, but I am totally lost on fixing it. Quicktime refuses to open it too. Alas ... t'weren't meant to be.
Post
#75685
Topic
Letter to LFL about DVD Defects (No OT vs SE discussion)
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75685/action/topic#75685
Time
I'm cross-posting this from the official site's forum because, frankly, I think I have a damn fine point here to raise and hope you all will take it to heart.

One person on the official site's forum received a replacement disc which fixed the skipping errors, and confirmed that none of the other defects I noted were corrected. He said something to the effect of "For now, we'll just have to live with it. We shouldn't have to, but we will."

I reply: Why should we have to live with it? You paid good, hard-earned money for a product that should be correct. If they were willing to fix the pressing errors, why not the mastering errors? If you bought a brand-new car and the rear speakers were wired in reverse, would you not take it back in to be fixed? Or if the fabric on one of your seats didn't quite match the rest of the interior? Or if the timing were just a little off at startup? All three of these are analogous to the defects in the Star Wars disc. Now, if every car rolled off the assembly line with these problems, there would be a massive recall announced to correct the problems. If consumers do not stand up for themselves, businesses will only take advantage of them. Why should you just accept a defective product?

I emplore you all to start a letter writing campaign to correct the defects we're pointing out in this thread. The BBB will pay attention and will definitely take strong action, even if just a few dozen letters come in on the same subject. Even Rome was built brick by brick. Take action against Lucasfilm and they will be forced to correct their errors.

Updated
On a positive note, I DID speak with somebody at Fox's disc exchange program this afternoon for almost half an hour. She is going to personally try to get better answers on the issue. I still think that Lucasfilm was in such a defensive posture over the OT/SE debate, that their knee-jerk response on the audio problem was to defend it as another creative change. But I digress ... Having a person take the time to actually hear out my issue thoroughly, be sure she understood the issue, clearly get the fact that these changes were different from the "bad production run" that they are fixing, and then take my name and number and promise to get back to me after really tracking down the issue, well, this is promising. Now more than ever, the volume of complaints will underscore the widespread nature of the problem.

Update 2
On a second postive note, I just got called BACK from Fox, apparently by the boss of the person with whom I spoke earlier. He spoke to me for another 10-15 minutes wanting to be sure that he understood all of the issues (and I'm confident he did). He seems to want to get to the bottom of this. While its ultimately a Lucasfilm issue (and he seemed to indicate that Lucasfilm is going to ultimately do whatever they are going to do) he did seem poised to discuss the issue with LFL intelligently. Having an insider talk with Lucasfilm has more potential than just having an angry fan bitching, but that said, I think a hundred angry fans bitching all at once in the right direction will also have an effect.
Post
#75670
Topic
Episode III Teaser Trailer
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75670/action/topic#75670
Time
Quote
Originally posted by: Darth Simon
Looks like the Lucas goons are slowly closing down the leaks of the teaser trailer...link one's account has been suspended

-Darth Simon


Because, you know, we can't have a giant commercial for the movie just floating around the net for free, you know. They need to charge $40 per person for that commercial.
Post
#75644
Topic
Episode III Teaser Trailer
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75644/action/topic#75644
Time
Glad I'm not a member. Exactly how many minutes did it take for the trailer to make it into the public domain?

The character on the left looks so different from the one on the right, I'm wondering if they are indeed the same person. I'm assuming this is Darth Sidious, played by Ian McD, but the make up looks soooo heavy compared to Palpatine. The cheeks are strangely built up. I almost had wondered if it was a scarred-up Anakin, but he'd need the suit. Lucas has suceeded at confusing me, if nothing else.

Anybody else find some of this movie looking extremely bright-and-in-the-daylight for such a "dark" movie?

Post
#75355
Topic
Anakin's ghost?!?!?!
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/75355/action/topic#75355
Time
Quote
Originally posted by: ricarleite
Quote
Originally posted by: Warbler
Naa, not miss piggy. How bout Kermit?


Nah, Miss Piggy. Frank Oz.


How about the "father" of Kermit and Fozzie? Check out "The Great Muppet Caper" if you don't know what I'm talking about.

I'd do this myself but I'm too busy. (And yet, here I am on this site again. What gives?)
Post
#74906
Topic
MagnoliaFan Edits: Ep I "Balance Of The Force", and Ep II "The Clone War" (Released)
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/74906/action/topic#74906
Time
It'll be interesting how he keeps the ESB revelation a surprise. I get the feeling it would be very hard to do but then again, we haven't seen what's coming yet. I get the feeling it would be VERY easy to preserve the ROTJ sibling surprise, though. It all depends on how it's executed on-screen.

Meanwhile, I'm avoiding spoilers on ROTS in hopes of giving myself some actual enjoyment while sitting in the theatre. There will be enough time to critique it after the third viewing.
Post
#74976
Topic
Letter to LFL about DVD Defects (No OT vs SE discussion)
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/74976/action/topic#74976
Time
They must be in The Matrix during that scene now. ;-) I suppose the whole color correction of that scene is wrong. The lights weren't noticeable to me the way the saber was. They could have put in the Ric Ollie red mood light and I probably wouldn't have noticed w/o a side by side comparison. But change the color of a lightsaber, and that's gonna get noticed (Just ask MagnoliaFan. ) by a helluva lot more people -- including 95% of the world who worships Star Wars less than me.

I've been scouring a particular thread on the official site dedicated to the DVD glitches, after LFL AND Fox wrote me back today. They do have a replacement program in effect. However, it seems to be related to skipping issues which I haven't experienced, and not the items I listed. I keep getting a runaround, as I'm clearly dealing with entry-level customer service. One email response quoted none of my original message, so I inquired what the nature of their response was. They responded by saying "This was about your DVD having some skipping issues. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance."

Funny, no skipping issues were listed in my email. Do these jackwads even bother to read the actual letters that come in?