SilverWook said:
I’d prefer some proof it was a error, not just George changing his mind twenty years later again.
Proof, I don’t have one. But I grew up with the OT reading the “Star Wars chronology” (the ancient basis for the UE, released in the early 90’s I guess) where the volcano duel is mentioned; so even before the 1997 SE (or the 2004 SE, the eyebrows changes not being part of the “first” SE) I was always surprised by Vader’s look: so the guy is deeply wounded, has lost his hair and has even injuries on his face and around his eyes, but he still has his eyebrows ?!? It reallly is a small change, but to me it is more aligned not only with the PT but even with TESB (I mean, look at his back head…); and don’t forget we saw this change before the release of ROTS (and I was, “hum… well, ok, good call George !” and then the celebration scene “hum… what the fuck are you doing with Hayden ?!?”). A small change, and a well done one (I don’t spot the CGI make-up). Had Lucas only done alterations like this one (to the canon I mean), people wouldn’t despise the SE so much. To sum up: I’m a semi-SE/semi-DE fan (so I watch Q2’s version of ROTJ as my canon edit).
Just to say the Rebels eyebrows have more to do with animation than anything else (it easier to read the character’s expression that way). Had it been a true OT hommage, eyebrows would have been Sebastian’s dark, not Hayden’s blonde… (it’s a “in between” hommage we can say) and remember that TCW/Rebels creator has recently defended Hayden’s ghost…