
- Time
- Post link
Lol I get that with the Terminator and the BTTF thread, also you have mail
Lol I get that with the Terminator and the BTTF thread, also you have mail
_,,,^..^,,,_ said:
As you can see, 3D BD has (obviously) more resolution, but the image is cropped on all four sides, and the colors are worst than the LD...
I think the colors on the 3D version are better although maybe a little too warm, but the LD timing there definitely looks too cold to me.
The major noticeable difference that struck me between the old timing and the new is the scene where the T-rex attacks the cars; in the 2D Bluray (and presumably older transfers) that scene is colored almost entirely in shades of blue whereas the 3D Bluray retains the same 'jungle' tones as the rest of the film. That being said, I couldn't possibly remember which one is closer to what I saw in 1993.
I agree the cropping is bad; this is why I'd love to see the old transfer retimed to something resembling the new colors.
Thanks for posting the pics. :)
George creates Star Wars.
Star Wars creates fans.
George destroys Star Wars.
Fans destroy George.
Fans create Star Wars.
Wasn't the 2011 Blu transfer cropped too? I've seen a comparison where the LD has more info on the top and sides:
Though apparently, the first pressings of the LD were ALSO cropped on all 4 sides, and it was called out by Video Watchdog. I believe that was what exposed "zoomboxing" to videophiles?
Also, the images of the 3D Blu-ray look very dim. I saw a 2D screening at a theater yesterday, and it looked much brighter than these screenshots.
I better get the old bluray (with actual grain) before the new one becomes more common. Or does the new set only use the new transfer for the 3D version?
EDIT: I just read that the new set uses the old transfer for the 2D version and you can't even play the 3D version without a 3D setup. I am happy. One film spared from Universal's meddling.
TServo2049 said:
Wasn't the 2011 Blu transfer cropped too? I've seen a comparison where the LD has more info on the top and sides:
Though apparently, the first pressings of the LD were ALSO cropped on all 4 sides, and it was called out by Video Watchdog. I believe that was what exposed "zoomboxing" to videophiles?
Lots of film transfers are zoomed differently, but its not really a big deal as the filmmakers frame their shots to account for this. (They want to make sure the film will project well no mater how the theater is set up.)
One important thing to note is certain website are showing images from the Jurassic Park 3D bluray, which look to be obtained from the opposing eye view.
http://www.highdefdiscnews.com/jurassic-park-3d-blu-ray-3d-review/
This will cause some image information to be different, especially at the edges.
While I still want the original 5.1 mix, I did think the newer 7.1 mix was better than what was done in 2011. The 3-D conversion overall was pretty good.I saw this in IMAX, but it sounds like the 3D Bluray has more DNR applied.
Some sites are now showing two DTS English tracks on the 3-D Bluray. DTS-MA 7.1 and DTS 5.1. Is this true?? And if so, the question of the day is... What source is the DTS 5.1 track?
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/topic/322922-jurassic-park-3d/
HTF reports both an English 7.1 DTS-MA, English 5.1 DTS-MA, and English 5.1 DTS. Say WHAAAAA?
Ok, now I'm very interested.
“Alright twinkle-toes, what’s your exit strategy?”
Also, anyone else thinking the 2011 disc is any good, here's the original trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWBKEmWWL38
Shitty YouTube quality, but you get the idea. Again, this has a similar feel to the 35mm print I saw last year. In fact, having seen JP cinematically way back in the 90s, then growing up with the VHS/LaserDiscs (had the DVDs but always went back to the LaserDiscs), I wasn't sure really what it should look like. Seeing it last year was a revelation. I hope that print is somewhere safe.
“Alright twinkle-toes, what’s your exit strategy?”
borisanddoris said:
Let's be frank too: this is a 3D only release, that is designed to be viewed in 3D, with glasses. We aren't really giving it a fair assessment if we're looking at it in 2D, on computer monitors.
_,,,^..^,,,_ said:
borisanddoris said:
As far as the image, the 3D disc is so much closer to the film print I saw. Surely not the same, but it's so much closer and better than the 2011 disc.
Don't know... the first image is a bit dark, but colors could be OK, as the second one;
When viewing 3D at home, does the image suffer from the same dimming and desaturation issues present at cinemas? I've never seen the home stuff myself, but remember reading about Peter Jackson adjusting attributes for The Hobbit during filming, taking these effects into account.
When converting a film from 3D to 2D (or simply taking a screenshot), do the same corrections need to be "reversed" as well?
borisanddoris said:
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/topic/322922-jurassic-park-3d/
HTF reports both an English 7.1 DTS-MA, English 5.1 DTS-MA, and English 5.1 DTS. Say WHAAAAA?
Ok, now I'm very interested.
here we go
DTS-HD Master Audio English 5406 kbps 7.1 / 48 kHz / 5406 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1509 kbps / 24-bit)
DTS Audio English 768 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 24-bit
DTS Audio English 384 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 384 kbps / 24-bit
Dolby Digital Audio Spanish 384 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 384 kbps / DN -4dB
Dolby Digital Audio French 384 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 384 kbps / DN -4dB
taken from http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/comparison.php?cID=1633#auswahl
Join the dark side… and get a free cookie!
The 3D BD as to be cropped on the sides because of the 3D effects. However one can extract the main eyeview (it's probably about 30gb in size) and watch it in 2D without hassle.
Syncing the original sound would be great. Also, is there online links to the LDS rip? It looks so awesome :)
borisanddoris said:
Also, anyone else thinking the 2011 disc is any good, here's the original trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWBKEmWWL38
Shitty YouTube quality, but you get the idea. Again, this has a similar feel to the 35mm print I saw last year. In fact, having seen JP cinematically way back in the 90s, then growing up with the VHS/LaserDiscs (had the DVDs but always went back to the LaserDiscs), I wasn't sure really what it should look like. Seeing it last year was a revelation. I hope that print is somewhere safe.
Neither are any good, but I would rather the pink EE and sharpening than that DNR nightmare
I'm holding judgement until I see it in motion on my 10 foot screen, but I'm leaning towards the more accurate colors.
“Alright twinkle-toes, what’s your exit strategy?”
Here is a list of (supposedly) all 112 US laserdiscs with DTS sound (scroll down to post #7).
The list doesn't include Japanese releases, many of which have English DTS - most seem to have a US equivalent but there are some Japanese exclusives such as this one that looks very interesting.
Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here
Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here
That DTS experience LD was also released on DVD in Japan.
Donations welcome: paypal.me/poit
bitcoin:13QDjXjt7w7BFiQc4Q7wpRGPtYKYchnm8x
Help get The Original Trilogy preserved!
poita said:
That DTS experience LD was also released on DVD in Japan.
http://www.demo-world.eu/forums/topic/715/pioneer-dts-experience-dvd-japan/
:)
What about the DTS JP Superbit DVD?
I've found some HD clips of the 3D BD on youtube; the colors, indeed, are better than what I thought at the beginning... watching a clip instead of screenshots revelals more things.
So, I downloaded two clips (T-rex and Gallimimus) and compared them with my PAL laserdiscs, just for fun.
Here you are my conclusions:
I was not aware that the 3D BD has scenes that were cut... I mean, six seconds are A LOT in a single scene, guess how many other scenes are cut, and how much time is "lost" in total...
My PAL DVD is not cut; what about the 2011 BD?
Sadly my projects are lost due to an HDD crash… 😦 | [Fundamental Collection] thread | blog.spoRv.com | fan preservation forum: fanres.com
are you sure they are untouched? maybe someone edited them as youtube can flag stuff like that
Obviously I can't be sure, but why youtube edited out that part of the scene, while there are so many worst examples not edited? By the way, the only chance to verify that is from someone who owns the 3D BD and that could check that scene.
Here you are the link to the comparison I've made (better viewed in HD) - top PAL laserdisc, bottom 3D BD (from youtube) - hope it will be useful for someone who decided to check his 3D BD.
Sadly my projects are lost due to an HDD crash… 😦 | [Fundamental Collection] thread | blog.spoRv.com | fan preservation forum: fanres.com
i asked someone to check
http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.php?p=7450010&postcount=410
looks like Youtube edited it
Join the dark side… and get a free cookie!
Can we have a link to the original YouTube video?
I do recall the TV version being edited in that manner.
Sadly my projects are lost due to an HDD crash… 😦 | [Fundamental Collection] thread | blog.spoRv.com | fan preservation forum: fanres.com
Yikes.
“Alright twinkle-toes, what’s your exit strategy?”
A perspective on the 3D from a member of the AVS forum .....
My review of JP3D:
The Good Things first: The 3D was wonderful! On a par with Titanic 3D!
Easily one of the best conversion jobs ever.
Didn't find any evidence of massive DNR, the picture looked clean with lots of detail.
The colours were rich and slightly warm, very film-like. But didn't look too much like a 90s movie to me, as it was so clean, and that's a good thing!
Sounded good too. An additional aspect of the soundtrack I will discuss below. There were quite a few pop out moments in addition to a very realistic depth perspective.
It was pure Nostalgia for me.
Now the things that bothered me:
1.The aspect ratio has been tampered with once again. The image has been zoom-boxed, cutting on all four sides, quite a lot. As a result Dinos heads get cut off slightly, eyes at the top edge of the screen get chopped off. The cropping was distracting(the ratio was still 1.85:1). The Imax 3D trailer was framed at 1.85:1, and there were even comparisons made with the Bluray(which was cropped), the 3D version was even more cropped than the Bluray. The framing of the IMAX3D trailer is exactly how it looked in the Laserdisc and VHS as well, but the cinema version has been cropped further than the 1.85:1 trailer cut. It makes me worry about the Bluray 3D.
2. The VFX models didn't lend themselves well to 3D. The lack of detail was clearly apparent and in contrast with the rest of the surroundings, which were 35mm footages.
Surprising things that I noticed: Lot more detail, individual objects, even the minutest ones are now clearly noticeable.
I also noticed the Pace of the film, it was like a roadrunner, one thing after another, barely ever slowing down.
I mean I've seen the movie countless times and know every single frame by heart, but never has its pace felt so relentless, my goodness( and no there was no speedup issues).
New additions:
There were definitely quite a few additions very clearly noticeable-
1. When the thunder strikes and the lawyer crouches, asking the doctors to head back to their cars, they have added a lightning flash visually, which was never there. And It makes the impact of the scene much better!
There are minor additional sounds added to the soundtrack(not the music track), extra velociraptor sounds when the deadly duo enter the kitchen, one of which clearly had a high-pitched cat sound.
2. The animatronic shots were the most impressive in 3D. However the final shot, when the T-Rex rears up to its full height in the Visitors center lobby and roars, knocked the earlier poor vfx 3D shots' balls out of the park. That last shot when the Rex Roars and the Banners fall was ABSOLUTELY EPIC, as it was in 2D when it originally came out. It had GREAT depth with the Tail swinging out of the screen+ it was highly detailed. I don't know how they could get the last CG shot with the T-Rex to look so detailed, imagined it to be lackluster like the other CG shots, the colour scheme of the Rex also looked slightly different, more colourful that is.
I'm catching it again on Sunday!
These didn't at all damage the experience for me, though the cat sound was a bit annoying and unrealistic(Well Gary Rydstrom succumbed to a little temptation it seems).
Jetrell Fo said:
A perspective on the 3D from a member of the AVS forum .....
My review of JP3D:
The Good Things first: The 3D was wonderful! On a par with Titanic 3D!
Easily one of the best conversion jobs ever.
Didn't find any evidence of massive DNR, the picture looked clean with lots of detail.
The colours were rich and slightly warm, very film-like. But didn't look too much like a 90s movie to me, as it was so clean, and that's a good thing!
Sounded good too. An additional aspect of the soundtrack I will discuss below. There were quite a few pop out moments in addition to a very realistic depth perspective.
It was pure Nostalgia for me.
Now the things that bothered me:
1.The aspect ratio has been tampered with once again. The image has been zoom-boxed, cutting on all four sides, quite a lot. As a result Dinos heads get cut off slightly, eyes at the top edge of the screen get chopped off. The cropping was distracting(the ratio was still 1.85:1). The Imax 3D trailer was framed at 1.85:1, and there were even comparisons made with the Bluray(which was cropped), the 3D version was even more cropped than the Bluray. The framing of the IMAX3D trailer is exactly how it looked in the Laserdisc and VHS as well, but the cinema version has been cropped further than the 1.85:1 trailer cut. It makes me worry about the Bluray 3D.
2. The VFX models didn't lend themselves well to 3D. The lack of detail was clearly apparent and in contrast with the rest of the surroundings, which were 35mm footages.
Surprising things that I noticed: Lot more detail, individual objects, even the minutest ones are now clearly noticeable.
I also noticed the Pace of the film, it was like a roadrunner, one thing after another, barely ever slowing down.
I mean I've seen the movie countless times and know every single frame by heart, but never has its pace felt so relentless, my goodness( and no there was no speedup issues).
New additions:
There were definitely quite a few additions very clearly noticeable-
1. When the thunder strikes and the lawyer crouches, asking the doctors to head back to their cars, they have added a lightning flash visually, which was never there. And It makes the impact of the scene much better!
There are minor additional sounds added to the soundtrack(not the music track), extra velociraptor sounds when the deadly duo enter the kitchen, one of which clearly had a high-pitched cat sound.
2. The animatronic shots were the most impressive in 3D. However the final shot, when the T-Rex rears up to its full height in the Visitors center lobby and roars, knocked the earlier poor vfx 3D shots' balls out of the park. That last shot when the Rex Roars and the Banners fall was ABSOLUTELY EPIC, as it was in 2D when it originally came out. It had GREAT depth with the Tail swinging out of the screen+ it was highly detailed. I don't know how they could get the last CG shot with the T-Rex to look so detailed, imagined it to be lackluster like the other CG shots, the colour scheme of the Rex also looked slightly different, more colourful that is.
I'm catching it again on Sunday!
These didn't at all damage the experience for me, though the cat sound was a bit annoying and unrealistic(Well Gary Rydstrom succumbed to a little temptation it seems).
Didn't find any evidence of massive DNR, the picture looked clean with lots of detail.
I can name 3 people that would spout that over there now that I am most of the guys left, its just mostly fanboy bull shit there now, there is a TON of DNR hyperbole on full