
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
All I have to do is close my eyes and think of you and there you are. :')
All I have to do is close my eyes and think of you and there you are. :')
To be clear, I interpreted "The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of The Force"' to be like saying "Having the strongest firepower is insignificant next to the power of a good admiral."
I don't get:
1. How would a Sith be any less of a rehash than an Imperial? How is the ansence of the Sith "taking things in a new direction" if the absence of the Empire isn't? How is Star Wars about Jedi vs. Sith yet not about Rebels vs. Empire?
2. Why can't a Force-user call themselves an Imperial? You can have Imperials without the Empire.
darklordoftech said:
I don't get:
1. How would a Sith be any less of a rehash than an Imperial? How is the ansence of the Sith "taking things in a new direction" if the absence of the Empire isn't? How is Star Wars about Jedi vs. Sith yet not about Rebels vs. Empire?
2. Why can't a Force-user call themselves an Imperial? You can have Imperials without the Empire.
Also, does a force user who is not necessarily evil, but just morally not in line with the Jedi (like if Han Solo in ANH were a force user) have to automatically be a Sith Lord?
The Person in Question
moviefreakedmind said:
darklordoftech said:
I don't get:
1. How would a Sith be any less of a rehash than an Imperial? How is the ansence of the Sith "taking things in a new direction" if the absence of the Empire isn't? How is Star Wars about Jedi vs. Sith yet not about Rebels vs. Empire?
2. Why can't a Force-user call themselves an Imperial? You can have Imperials without the Empire.
Also, does a force user who is not necessarily evil, but just morally not in line with the Jedi (like if Han Solo in ANH were a force user) have to automatically be a Sith Lord?
Absolutely not. Not everybody who disagrees with the President is a member of Al-Qaeda. One of my biggest criticisms of the EU is that everyone who disagrees with the leading Jedi Master of the time becomes a Sith Lord.
darklordoftech said:
One of my biggest criticisms of the EU is that everyone who disagrees with the leading Jedi Master of the time becomes a Sith Lord.
Not all EU is like that.
真実
imperialscum said:
darklordoftech said:
One of my biggest criticisms of the EU is that everyone who disagrees with the leading Jedi Master of the time becomes a Sith Lord.
Not all EU is like that.
Not all, but plenty.
edit: nvm
skyjedi2005 said:
No Jedi forbidden to love bullshit, or forbidden to marry and have children.
This so much.
darklordoftech said:
I don't get:
1. How would a Sith be any less of a rehash than an Imperial? How is the ansence of the Sith "taking things in a new direction" if the absence of the Empire isn't? How is Star Wars about Jedi vs. Sith yet not about Rebels vs. Empire?
2. Why can't a Force-user call themselves an Imperial? You can have Imperials without the Empire.
Both Sith and the Empire would be a rehash. I'd rather not see either in the sequels.
A Force user could call themselves an Imperial. They could call themselves an elephant if they wanted. Without an actual Empire backing them up they are just appropriating a lost cause. Like U.S. southerners who still wave Confederate flags. Utterly meaningless.
I also wouldn't want to see a repeat of the prequels where a Force user actually goes about building an Empire. We already know that makes for bad cinema.
pablumatic said:A Force user could call themselves an Imperial. They could call themselves an elephant if they wanted. Without an actual Empire backing them up they are just appropriating a lost cause. Like U.S. southerners who still wave Confederate flags. Utterly meaningless.
I also wouldn't want to see a repeat of the prequels where a Force user actually goes about building an Empire. We already know that makes for bad cinema.
Any Force-user who seeks to rule the galaxy without an actual Empire backing them up would be "just appropriating a lost cause", whether they call themselves a Sith, an Imperial, or something else.
If nobody goes about building an Empire, nobody is going to be ruling the galaxy.
Johnny Ringo said: New Saber Colours
What's wrong with new saber colors?
I would like them to either use every colour of the rainbow for lightsabres, without regard to affiliation, or give colours symbolic meanings. I prefer the former, but the latter is far better than what we have now.
Modern-day tactical gear. Star Wars is leather holsters and belts, not MOLLE gear and plate carriers.
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
Excessive lightsaber use.
I don't want a deliberate allegory of current real life events political or otherwise, i want to see a grand space opera spectacle.
“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.
There has to be a least one quintessential duel. Obviously not every character has to brandish a lightsaber every five seconds like ROTS though.
I believe this is the "what don't you want in episode 7" thread.
RicOlie_2 said:
I believe this is the "what don't you want in episode 7" thread.
I'm ok with what Carthage posted.
Apologies, Dark Lord of the Thread. I will defer to your wise judgement in the future.
RicOlie_2 said:
Apologies, Dark Lord of the Thread. I will defer to your wise judgement in the future.
It's more that I created the thread than it is that I'm wise.
Double-bladed lightsabers with two different coloured blades. It looks stupid in fan art, it would look worse in a live-action motion picture.
darklordoftech said:
RicOlie_2 said:
Apologies, Dark Lord of the Thread. I will defer to your wise judgement in the future.
It's more that I created the thread than it is that I'm wise.
ALLOL! Thanks for that delightfully silly response.
Shrinkage.
No kidding. If Chewie's any shorter than he was in ROTJ...!!