logo Sign In

Mel Gibson is nuts — Page 3

Author
Time

Warbler said:

then create another thread for it.

If I did that, then you'd just try to derail it with all of this Mel Gibson non-sense.  Seriously, this thread is about Tango now.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

 

But if there is no obvious physical peril in the situation why risk creating some for yourself over something that can eventually be replaced or the loss of it rationalised? I can't think of any inanimate object I own worth using violence to protect.

If you can prevent the situation by any non-violent means it makes sense to try but if the theft is going to happen and only an act of violence can prevent it why bother?

The criminal may get caught, or may not, notch it down to experience (sometimes unpleasant things happen).

 

All I can say is that if some a**hole breaks into my house, or tries to make off with some of my property, there will be hot lead flying close behind him. Fortunately, shooting at thieves is pretty much encouraged in my great state of Texas.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

xhonzi said:

Warbler said:

then create another thread for it.

If I did that, then you'd just try to derail it with all of this Mel Gibson non-sense.  Seriously, this thread is about Tango now.

Just who do you think I am,  Frink?

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

Well, I suppose I should have said "could be justifiable" as I'm not a big condoner of violence either.

 http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Grey-Boxes-or-People-who-need-Avatars/post/387545/#TopicPost387545

Oh yeahs?

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time

Warbler said:

xhonzi said:

Warbler said:

then create another thread for it.

If I did that, then you'd just try to derail it with all of this Mel Gibson non-sense.  Seriously, this thread is about Tango now.

Just who do you think I am,  Frink?

 No, I think you're a guy who refuses to change the title of the thread to "Tango (was: Mel Gibson is nuts)" when clearly more than 3% of the posts are about the Tango.  And then you insist on still posting about Mel Gibson in my Tango thread.

IT'S MY TRILOGY, AND I WANT IT NOW!

"[George Lucas] rebooted the franchise in 1997 without telling anyone." -skyjedi2005

"Yeah, well, George says a lot of things..." a young 1997 xhonzi on RASSM

"They're my movies." -George Lucas. 19 people won oscars for their work on Star Wars (1977) and George Lucas wasn't one of them.

Rewrite the Prequels!

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

RE:  xhonzi:  Gasp!  You unearthed my past demons!  How dare you?!  I shall now throw verbal slurs at you and punch you in areas around the face!  I hope you're holding a baby in front of you to defend yourself, not that that will matter because there will be fisticuffs, damnit!

Whoo.  Let's see now.  Going back to Warb but not bothering to do blockquotes because I'm lazy.

My whole point in agreeing with C3PX's statement was that I was not drawing conclusions.  I'm neither defending Mel Gibson nor am I attacking him.  I have not listened to the tapes.  Maybe if I had, I would be in more of a position to express an opinion, but please don't mistake me for doing so already because I'm not.  But even if I did, and I was repulsed by whatever statements I heard, I don't know for sure if it would be enough to pass judgment.  Everyone has moments of lost temper.  There have been threads where you have lost your temper and slung vitriol (sometimes under a different alias).  In this very thread, I briefly lost my own temper.  (Not to mention that in closed company, people often say politically incorrect or otherwise offensive statements.)  The point is, neither of us (I hope) are defined by it.  But again let me state that this is not me vindicating Mel Gibson of anything.  Like everything else I've said in this thread, it is intended to be a generalized statement intended for reflection, not necessarily a defense of Mel Gibson, a subject of which I've already admitted little real knowledge of.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

xhonzi said:

No, I think you're a guy who refuses to change the title of the thread to "Tango (was: Mel Gibson is nuts)" when clearly more than 3% of the posts are about the Tango.  And then you insist on still posting about Mel Gibson in my Tango thread.


So this thread is now about Tango?

Moth3r said: No, there is no video embedding option in this forum software (thank god!)

 

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

My whole point in agreeing with C3PX's statement was that I was not drawing conclusions.  I'm neither defending Mel Gibson nor am I attacking him.  I have not listened to the tapes.  Maybe if I had, I would be in more of a position to express an opinion, but please don't mistake me for doing so already because I'm not.  But even if I did, and I was repulsed by whatever statements I heard, I don't know for sure if it would be enough to pass judgment. 

only one way to know for certain.

Gaffer Tape said:

Everyone has moments of lost temper. 

and how do you know this was just one of those without listening to the tapes?

Gaffer Tape said:

There have been threads where you have lost your temper and slung vitriol (sometimes under a different alias). 

true, much to my embarrassment and regret.   But I never used the n-word and other racial slurs, nor made actual threats of violence.   Imho there is a line you don't cross, and Gibson crossed it.

Gaffer Tape said:

In this very thread, I briefly lost my own temper.  (Not to mention that in closed company, people often say politically incorrect or otherwise offensive statements.)  The point is, neither of us (I hope) are defined by it. 

perhaps Gibson is.  Its possible you might conclude that by listening to the tape.

Gaffer Tape said:

But again let me state that this is not me vindicating Mel Gibson of anything.  Like everything else I've said in this thread, it is intended to be a generalized statement intended for reflection, not necessarily a defense of Mel Gibson, a subject of which I've already admitted little real knowledge of.

basically what you are saying is "let he who is without sin, cast the first stone" which is a good point,  but does that mean that people like Hitler shouldn't be stoned? I am not saying Gibson is as bad as Hitler.   I'm just saying there the mistakes that all of us make, and then there those particularly bad evil ones that most of us avoid.   Gibson made the latter kinds of mistakes.

Author
Time

No, because I also advocated my visceral, emotional pleasure at manipulators and theives being physically beaten down, so I'm certainly not exactly perfect at "cast the first stone" logic.  I might listen to the tapes, but, again, I have to point out that I have passed no judgment or opinion on Mel Gibson in either direction, yet some of your responses to my last post seem to indicate that you're getting that impression.  I certainly don't condone jumping to conclusions without facts, and if I actually was attempting to voice an opinion on Mel Gibson's behavior without having first listened to the tapes, then I would certainly understand why you would be dismissive of those opinions. 

I'll tell you what, though.  I will make an effort to listen to them tomorrow, and I'll try get back with you on a more specific level.

There is no lingerie in space…

C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

CompMovieGuy said:

xhonzi said:

No, I think you're a guy who refuses to change the title of the thread to "Tango (was: Mel Gibson is nuts)" when clearly more than 3% of the posts are about the Tango.  And then you insist on still posting about Mel Gibson in my Tango thread.


So this thread is now about Tango?

I'd rather watch Tango & Gibson.*

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

 I have to point out that I have passed no judgment or opinion on Mel Gibson in either direction, yet some of your responses to my last post seem to indicate that you're getting that impression.

sorry about that,  I was confused.   It sounded like you were implying that C3PX's statement should be applied to the situation with Mel Gibson(C3PX was making the statement in regards to Gibson, and you said you agreed with C3PX's statement).   I just think that one needs to listen to the tapes before thinking that.     But again, I apologize for misunderstand you.

Gaffer Tape said:

I'll tell you what, though.  I will make an effort to listen to them tomorrow, and I'll try get back with you on a more specific level.

fair enough. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

CompMovieGuy said:

OK

Mel Gibson is bad
The Gold-Digging blackmailing mail order Russian bride is worse

And thats how people see it, people dont like over the top (Gibson) but they especially dont like people who try to screw other people over and then get caught doing it (email extortion, and yes that is confirmed)

/thread

Extortion like all crimes is a matter for courts to settle, not fists and verbal insults.

The use of violence in close proximity to a child is worse than swindling anyone out any amount of money (especially someone like Gibson).

If this woman is so notorious why marry her in the first place?

Marriage is a contract with legal obligations and involves money, if you enter into a legally binding contract where loss of money is a possibility you should at least do a background check on the person you are signing on the dotted line with.

If you take that risk without taking the time to weigh up the potential losses you get what's coming to you.

Brake a deal and face the wheel Max.

Naturally when I was describing the response to being robbed I was stating my point of view, other points of view are available. I personally feel that the work of the police is difficult enough without adding needless violence into the equation.

Things are just things, they are ultimately replaceable, people are unique and in their finite lifespans have more to offer than any inanimate object. They need to be preserved and protected more than objects and cash do. Thems my principles.

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bingowings said:

If this woman is so notorious why marry her in the first place?

Because she's hot, young, and not a Jew or Black*

Author
Time

He didnt marry her, thus why she was trying to extort him

Shes the ultimate b*tch gold digger, lowest form of any woman... and hes a nut, end of story

Moth3r said: No, there is no video embedding option in this forum software (thank god!)

 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

If he didn't marry or have a child with her he could have just moved out and let the lawyers deal with it.

He did have a child with her however and that carries legal and financial responsibilities but they too should be dealt with via the courts.

While he was still married he employed her and then entered into a relationship with her which went sour later.

Gibson still comes out of this worse.

If someone is trying to extort money out of you illegally let the lawyers sort it out and cut all ties with the person.

Violence + a child + plus sexist, racist rants on tape = Almost Worst Case Scenario (if he had murdered her as well he would have got the full set).

Gibson can afford the best common sense money can buy (advice) he should buy some of that and lay off the booze a bit more.

Author
Time

what he should do is seek therapy and medication.   He needs both, desperately. 

Author
Time

In all honesty, I think Mel Gibson needs rehab and therapy.


The man clearly has problems. I come from a long line of Manic Depressives. So, I think he might be Bipolar. His lifestyle and a disorder like that are not a good combination.

Alcohol is a bad thing for even the best of men.

Bipolar Disorder is a hard thing to live with.

Mix 'em together, and you got one unstable human being.

My dad was never an alcoholic, but he is bipolar. Without his medicine, he is terrifying.

 

 

 

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

Gaffer Tape said:

C3PX said:

It's my estimation that every man who ever got famous (or any man at all, for that matter) is one kind of son-of-a-bitch or another.

Thanks there, Captain Tightpants.

Nice catch.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape

Author
Time

It was strange to read that a William Peter Blatty (an author and director I greatly admire) is a big fan of The Passion Of The Christ.

With Mel's rantage skillz perhaps he should write the next sequel to The Exorcist.

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

The instances when using violence to repel the loss of greenbacks alone is in anyway appropriate are mercifully beyond the comprehension of most (if not all) the people known to us.

It's only remotely considerable in places of absolute poverty where the loss of a small piece of metal or a small green piece of paper could result in homelessness and starvation.

 

Appropriate? Considerable? Whatever. Some punk tries to steal from me, I will hurt him. Obviously the situation varies with the size of the guy and what kinds of weapons he has, but if I have the opportunity to protect my property (even some lousy greenbacks) against some idiot who has decided to take it from me, I am going to take action. 

I see no reason why I should stand back and watch someone rob me when I could do something about it? Sadly, from the looks of things, most people would think I am wrong for doing so. Looks like the only way to be considered a decent person in this world is to amputate your own balls, bend over, and hold your cheeks open as wide as possible and hope those who will screw you will be kind enough to use lube when they do so.

Warb mentioned taking the law into your own hands? The law has nothing to do with it, it is my property being taken, I have a right to defend it. I am not attacking the guy because he is breaking the law, I am attacking him because he is taking something that belongs to me.

"Every time Warb sighs, an angel falls into a vat of mapel syrup." - Gaffer Tape