Sign In

MAC or PC — Page 14

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yhwx. It’s a random combination of letters with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Free Collipso!

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

also: what? https://github.com/InAndOutLand. nevermind, you mentioned this before.

Free Collipso!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

Shouldn’t that make my proof more trust-able?

I did not do try to “cheat” at this. Even your version of me would think it’s a waste of effort. What more proof do you want?

Because I’ll give you all of it.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

Shouldn’t that make my proof more trust-able?

I did not do try to “cheat” at this. Even your version of me would think it’s a waste of effort. What more proof do you want?

Because I’ll give you all of it.

i don’t need any proof. you can’t prove things on the internet.

but you seem like a nice person, so sorry for treating you like you are not a nice person (just proving that i understand markdown, because it felt like a lark. but honestly, i believe all people are deserving of respect, so i am am going to try to act like it and give you more respect)

Free Collipso!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

Shouldn’t that make my proof more trust-able?

I did not do try to “cheat” at this. Even your version of me would think it’s a waste of effort. What more proof do you want?

Because I’ll give you all of it.

i don’t need any proof. you can’t prove things on the internet.

but you seem like a nice person, so sorry for treating you like you are not a nice person (just proving that i understand markdown, because it felt like a lark. but honestly, i believe all people are deserving of respect, so i am am going to try to act like it and give you more respect)

Don’t bother trying to give me a fake genuineness of being nice to me, as you seem to be doing by all your strikethroughs.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

Shouldn’t that make my proof more trust-able?

I did not do try to “cheat” at this. Even your version of me would think it’s a waste of effort. What more proof do you want?

Because I’ll give you all of it.

i don’t need any proof. you can’t prove things on the internet.

but you seem like a nice person, so sorry for treating you like you are not a nice person (just proving that i understand markdown, because it felt like a lark. but honestly, i believe all people are deserving of respect, so i am am going to try to act like it and give you more respect)

Don’t bother trying to give me a fake genuineness of being nice to me, as you seem to be doing by all your strikethroughs.

no, that was me having a lark. should have made those two comments in two posts i guess. to separate them more.

Free Collipso!

Author
Time

yhwx said:

Do you remember if you had any success in defining “fed”?

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time
 (Edited)

AntcuFaalb said:

yhwx said:

Do you remember if you had any success in defining “fed”?

I believe I did.

(I was trying to figure out all the slang definitions of fed, to be clear)

Author
Time

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

dahmage said:

yhwx said:
Also: I do like the name “yackwhicks.” 😉

i would hope you like your name, why else would you have chosen it?

My name is yackwicks. It’s a random combination of words with no meaning.

Proof: I got it from random.org.

thats not how proof works

Is this better? (I joined on May 23rd of this year)

yikes. well, if it was anyone else i would consider it proof, because who would take all the time to doctor their search history to prove a point.

Shouldn’t that make my proof more trust-able?

I did not do try to “cheat” at this. Even your version of me would think it’s a waste of effort. What more proof do you want?

Because I’ll give you all of it.

i don’t need any proof. you can’t prove things on the internet.

but you seem like a nice person, so sorry for treating you like you are not a nice person (just proving that i understand markdown, because it felt like a lark. but honestly, i believe all people are deserving of respect, so i am am going to try to act like it and give you more respect)

Don’t bother trying to give me a fake genuineness of being nice to me, as you seem to be doing by all your strikethroughs.

no, that was me having a lark. should have made those two comments in two posts i guess. to separate them more.

Differences reconciled.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Ugh that podcast. I could listen to four normal ones in the time it takes to listen to one of those.

That’s the fun of it. It’s supposed to be long.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

I’m too busy listening to good podcasts to have time for one that’s supposed to be long.

Five stars on iTunes.

Anyway, this is a big divide in the podcast community. I listen to a small amount of very long podcasts, which I like. Try this one, I think you’ll like it.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Tyrphanax said:

yhwx said:

Dek Rollins said:

yhwx said:

This is exactly one of things I don’t like about PCs: Unnecessary maintainment.

Are you calling proper water-cooling “unnecessary maintainment”?

Yes. Why should I have to care about water-cooling? It should just work.

(that’s maintenance, by the way)

Totally forgot. Thank you.

I thought you misspelled it because you were joking.

You watercool because when you overclock you generate more heat.

It does “just work” but if you watercool stuff, it works better.

Yeah, but I shouldn’t care if I want to overclock or not. I shouldn’t care about having to make sure every little level is perfect. I shouldn’t care about those things.

You shouldn’t care about file extensions.

But I do.

Come at me.

Free Collipso!

Author
Time

My suggestion wasn’t to be taken totally seriously.

I’m pretty sure they already get tons of email about how it’s too long. You’re never going to satisfy everyone on the Internet, so it’s better to be opinionated than to be pandering.

Author
Time

Why is this still going?

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.