logo Sign In

Idea: replacing the 'Crushed Blacks' of the 2004 and 2011 official releases...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

As I understand it, the 2004 & 2011 releases suffer from “crushed blacks”, where areas which previously contained varying levels of darkness have been flattened to straight blackness, losing detail.

I was wondering… would it be possible to replace those crushed areas with the equivalent areas from DJ’s V3 or some similar source? Obviously those areas would be blurry compared to the rest of the frame, but at the same time they are awfully dark, so perhaps it wouldn’t be as noticeable.

Thoughts from people who actually know what they’re talking about would be great.

ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project

Author
Time

It's highly unlikely that you'll get both images to line up perfectly (especially since most LD transfers were slightly warped and suffer some minor gate weave jitter, whereas the 2004 transfer ist pretty much stable because of the restauration).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

^A very good idea! I'd never thought of that. The only problem would be applying the filter in scenes with smearing...

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I've been fantasizing about doing this very thing for quite a while now, and after seeing this thread, I though I might play with the idea a bit.  I don't have V3 (yet), so it may not look spectacular.

I took this shot from harmy's (superb) ded, and this shot from gout.  After adjusting for the aforementioned distortion and whatnot, I came up with this result.

IMHO, some parts work pretty well, but some aren't perfect.  Maybe it would look more real if I did better with the shadows on his nose and jaw.  I'll take another look at it tomorrow.  Oh, and btw, the extreme blockiness you see in the upper left isn't part of the matte I generated, its just due to the poor quality of the gout rip I have on hand.  If it is/were possible to adjust for the warping with a script, or perhaps depending on the consistency of the warping, this might be possible.

 

“We have a responsibility to safeguard history.” -Gage Blackwood

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I remember once reading some equally ridiculous explanation as to why there was a blue cast to the Tantive corridors.

Edit: discussed here.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time

Well, in case of George Lucas, everything can be explained by "because of the director's creative intent".

Author
Time

Pericles77 said:

"We did not crush the blacks on Episode 4 or Episode 6 in the 2004 transfers. Some scenes are deliberately dark and dense (not the same thing), because of the director's creative intent."

Geez, nobody crushes blacks on purpose. But they are crushed nonetheless, so it was done by mistake.  "Dark and dense"... what a bunch of rancor poo.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

They can shove those transfers where it's dark and dense...

Author
Time

Pericles77 wrote:

"We did not crush the blacks on Episode 4 or Episode 6 in the 2004 transfers. Some scenes are deliberately dark and dense (not the same thing), because of the director's creative intent."

Full thread here: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=238224

Page 34 (in the text only version) - 09-13-2011, 11:24 PM

Moth3r wrote: I remember once reading some equally ridiculous explanation as to why there was a blue cast to the Tantive corridors.

For what it's worth, this is one of the few people who worked on a SW film and is willing to openly talk about what happened.  There are now two releases with this color scheme, might as well listen and find out how/why it happened.  Same thread from a later post about the 2004:

because the scans were already clipped -- i.e., slightly overexposed for video.

Author
Time

It would be interesting to hear how the thoughts went when they timed these sequences.

fucked up

back to normal

 

fucked up

back to normal

normal

back to fucked up

color is gone

color is back

Or how about these.

Decrease the gamma and add purple to the spark

I want the image to be devoid of color here except make the clothes of the Jawa purple

Should Vader's lights in his belt be green or do you want them to be blue instead?

No, make them blue in this shot instead

And on and on, you could easily fill an entire book with all the errors in these transfers.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Laserschwert said:

They can shove those transfers where it's dark and dense...

Like the back of a Volkswagen?

Author
Time

I think a few of the things we are seeing and complaining about are are just differences in how we've been seeing them for years on pre-dvd media and how they are supposed to be seen. We all know about all those garbage matt boxes, right? Well, when you darken the transfer those garbage matts should be less noticable. I think some of what we are seeing is that for years we have been watching this films from fairly poor transfers. TV, VHS, and LD don't have that high of an image and the TV's they were made for matched how they were scanned.

I think a lot of the issue is that these films were dark originally and we just aren't used to it. Also, I've been watching the special featured on the BRD and I've noticed a lot of variation in how the scenes from the films ended up transfered into the making of documentaries. I've noticed a lot of sabers with non-white cores and other oddities that were issues with the 2004 DVD's.

I'm not saying that a lot of these issues shouldn't have been dealt with, but that they are inherent to the films themselves. There is some fading damage (leading to magenta fiery glows when they should be very while), and some scenes have been over color corrected manually and there is a lot that needs to be fixed, but the crushed blacks and some of the other issues I think are part of the way we are used to seeing the films transferred compared to a more accurate transfer. ANH was color corrected to closely match the technicolor print. As none of us have seen that print and how the colors stand out, I don't think we can really judge.

I'm not saying the 2004/2011 versions are perfect, but I think they are closer to the theatrical presentation than the TV/VHS/LD versions were. One way to judge is to look at the period prints from the movie stills and look at how dark they were. They weren't as light as the TV/VHS/LD transfers.

Author
Time

^^

Only the 1997 SE was corrected to match the Technicolor print. The 1997 SE looked great, and much different than the 2004 one, which does not resemble it for the most part.

Author
Time

yotsuya said:

I think a few of the things we are seeing and complaining about are are just differences in how we've been seeing them for years on pre-dvd media and how they are supposed to be seen. We all know about all those garbage matt boxes, right? Well, when you darken the transfer those garbage matts should be less noticable. I think some of what we are seeing is that for years we have been watching this films from fairly poor transfers. TV, VHS, and LD don't have that high of an image and the TV's they were made for matched how they were scanned.

 

I think a lot of the issue is that these films were dark originally and we just aren't used to it. I'm not saying that a lot of these issues shouldn't have been dealt with, but that they are inherent to the films themselves. but the crushed blacks and some of the other issues I think are part of the way we are used to seeing the films transferred compared to a more accurate transfer.

Really? I think Gil Taylor and Peter Suschitzky would like to have a word with you, or the director for that matter, oh I forgot he turned insane.

yotsuya said:

ANH was color corrected to closely match the technicolor print. As none of us have seen that print and how the colors stand out, I don't think we can really judge.

Yes, the 1997 Special Edition was, but not these 2004/11 video masters. Many people have seen IB Technicolor prints projected many times through the years, as late as last summer in fact and there's really no mystical science involved on how these films should look, this is one of the most widely seen films in cinema history with lots of reference material, weird that no one has pointed out the inconsistencies in color timing and crushed blacks and blown out whites in the cinema reviews throughout the years. The look on this film wasn't particularly stylized, it had a very natural look like other 70's films at the time like Jaws or Close Encounters Of The Third Kind.

If you look at the examples I posted above, those are all before and after shots just separated by editing and should have the same basic color levels, we're talking seconds between the changes in levels, as a colortimer you should get fired from your job if you presented such inconsistency. Vader's blue lights in the belt seems like a minor thing to be upset about, but how do you get those green lights to display as blue if you haven't screwed up something else (if you don't isolate the lights themselves). This terrible inconsistency in color and contrast levels is what is causing these films to look like shit in their present incarnation, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure this out.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

yotsuya said:

I'm not saying the 2004/2011 versions are perfect, but I think they are closer to the theatrical presentation than the TV/VHS/LD versions were. One way to judge is to look at the period prints from the movie stills and look at how dark they were. They weren't as light as the TV/VHS/LD transfers.

I don't think you're going to find much support for your theory here.  Certainly my experience with the 16mm prints, made in the years that the films were released, contradict your assertion.

"Close the blast doors!"
Puggo’s website | Rescuing Star Wars

Author
Time

msycamore said:


color is gone

http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/5618/vlcsnap2010121820h22m35.png

color is back

http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/9854/vlcsnap2011092118h06m04.png
The best part to me about this particular set is that both of those bolts were created digitally for the SE. This is no reason the first one should have even been white, let alone remain that way all the way through the BD.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Yeah, it's extremely sloppy. There is one thing if these new versions had a new specific modern look, they aren't the original films and as far as I know, no effort was made to match those films anyway, so a new colortiming can be nice if Lucas now wants them to look different, but do a standard professional job when you're at it so that those who like these updated versions at least have something to enjoy.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

The desaturated laser bolts are all over place.  I noticed many of them when I was making colour correction notes for Harmy's version.  In addition to the ones in the opening flyby and the remote, many shots in the Death Star battle are also affected.  In one shot they will look great and then a moment later they have no color at all, or only a little bit, it's ridiculous.  There is also a weird thing going on in a couple places where they have a nasty blue edge, so that instead of appearing to be green blasts with a yellow core, they are blue with a green core.  Looks pretty horrific when you consider that in the original version all the laser blasts were consistently coloured and fully saturated.

As for crushed blacks, there's no way the film was ever supposed to look like that.  It's true that the old video transfers were blown out and had little contrast, but the movie's 'true' look was very natural, not filled with darkness that obscures all the shadow detail.