logo Sign In

Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released) — Page 601

Author
Time

Well, I did say a while ago that I’m actually considering doing two different color versions for 3.0 but even the main version will likely be somewhere between 2.5 and 2.7 color-wise.

Author
Time

Technicolor for some; miniature American flags for others!

Author
Time

Dat_SW_Guy said:

drifiting a bit off-topic, you can actually see David Prowse behind the Darth Vader (like you already know 😐) just a little thing I spotted while watching 2.7.
(NTSC DVD5 version)
increased brightness and contrast

Vader

I’ve seen this brought up in other places. Are people pointing this out as a mistake in the film?
There is supposed to be a guy in there ya know…
It’s Mannequin Skyguy!

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:

Dat_SW_Guy said:

drifiting a bit off-topic, you can actually see David Prowse behind the Darth Vader (like you already know 😐) just a little thing I spotted while watching 2.7.
(NTSC DVD5 version)
increased brightness and contrast

Vader

I’ve seen this brought up in other places. Are people pointing this out as a mistake in the film?
There is supposed to be a guy in there ya know…
It’s Mannequin Skyguy!

Completely agreed… I’ve never understood the issue either. It would only make sense to me if Vader was a full on robot/android.

Author
Time

I’ve always theorized that it’s a dead body inside the Vader suit, which itself is fully sentient and requires human flesh to keep running. It’s like a reverse Weekend at Bernie’s scenario of sorts.

she/her
mwah

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:

Dat_SW_Guy said:

drifiting a bit off-topic, you can actually see David Prowse behind the Darth Vader (like you already know 😐) just a little thing I spotted while watching 2.7.
(NTSC DVD5 version)
increased brightness and contrast

Vader

I’ve seen this brought up in other places. Are people pointing this out as a mistake in the film?
There is supposed to be a guy in there ya know…
It’s Mannequin Skyguy!

I don’t think anyone’s pointing it out as a mistake, just more of a curiosity.

Author
Time

clutchins said:

I’ve always theorized that it’s a dead body inside the Vader suit, which itself is fully sentient and requires human flesh to keep running. It’s like a reverse Weekend at Bernie’s scenario of sorts.

Shut up and take my money.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

there is (technically) a dead body in Darth Vadars suit. Anakin got double KO’ed on his legs and he was burning to a crisp, that would easily kill someone, then Sidious suited him up to Vader, and is more machine than man.

theeeeorrryyy

JEDIT: > clutchins said:

I’ve always theorized that it’s a dead body inside the Vader suit, which itself is fully sentient and requires human flesh to keep running. It’s like a reverse Weekend at Bernie’s scenario of sorts.

someone already said that

this post has been edited.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Dat_SW_Guy said:

there is (technically) a dead body in Darth Vadars suit. Anakin got double KO’ed on his legs and he was burning to a crisp, that would easily kill someone, then Sidious suited him up to Vader, and is more machine than man.

theeeeorrryyy

JEDIT: > clutchins said:

I’ve always theorized that it’s a dead body inside the Vader suit, which itself is fully sentient and requires human flesh to keep running. It’s like a reverse Weekend at Bernie’s scenario of sorts.

someone already said that

What?

So you repeated what someone else said, then said that someone already said it?

Author
Time

Did you miss the part where he admitted he’s a troll?

Author
Time

yep, both a troll and a regular user.

By the way, I was just flinging through my laserdisc and found this frame, And during the part when Obi-wan shows Luke Orphan Annie’s lightsaber, the misplaced saber glow was more than that, look at this picture.

A true frame

This is what my laserdisc actually shows rather than 2.7 where it is not there, only one glow, this one is more accurate than the flawed GOUT. you need to implement this mistake.

sarcasm

this post has been edited.

Author
Time

I think anyone who openly admits to being a troll should be banned, don’t you?

Author
Time

Not sure if it is against the rules or not. As far as I know, no one has determined if he is a sock for an ex member, but that would obviously be bannable.

The annoying thing is that he mixes in new user type normal ignorant questions with absurdly stupid ones. So, ignoring or responding harshly to the ones that he calls his “subtle trolling” risks setting a bad precedent for how people respond to new members who legitimately have similar questions.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

I think anyone who openly admits to being a troll should be banned, don’t you?

yes

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I’m just a new member. But the trolling part not intentional and went along with. It was the parr where I could not play an m2ts file, then the continuity error or 3PO, which was the first troll of the bunch, however I am still a regular user not agreeing with George’s CGI and wants the OT back.

I don’t waste people’s hard work like a player on a War Game

EDIT:I think I should stop doing this and be a regular user.

this post has been edited.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

That was what I originally thought. But when you admitted to trying to troll as subtly as possible while still asking many basic (but potentially honest) questions. Well, boy who cried wolf etc.

Your username probably doesn’t help the situation. Figured it was ironic early on (or you were very young), but after the trolling it just looked like any other sock account name that Wario kid would make. Like a novelty, themed, or alternate account.

Anyway, we obviously don’t worry about being serious all the time here and some of us tolerate/enjoy the occasional derailing. But I think most of us like to know what/who we’re dealing with.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Dat_SW_Guy said:

EDIT:I think I should stop doing this and be a regular user.

Well that didnt seem to last. You’re doing it again. Aren’t you? I’m not sure why I try to give you the benefit of the doubt from time to time.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

towne32 said:

You’re doing it again. Aren’t you?

Just try to ignore the guy. If people around were not that easily provoked (and not provokative themselves sometimes…), you wouldn’t have to deal with so many blatant trolls.

By the way Harmy et al., I’m looking forward to seeing your new “blu team joint-venture” project.

Still -177 days before TFA !

Author
Time

Yeah, you’re right. Like I said, I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt. Unfortunately the form of trolling he chose is one that mocks new users (but he also seems to be a new user with actual newb questions). Oh well.

It’s more the fact that I’d like to be helpful towards him and not ignore him when he has actual simple questions. But I think we’re past that.