logo Sign In

Dr. M's Reinventing The Wheel Edition (PAL to NTSC+) (Released) — Page 3

Author
Time
If you dont mind I would like to up load your sample to a.b.starwars with a short nfo that links back to this thread. That way maybe you will get more feedback. I am currently downloading it right now and will post feedback later today.
Author
Time
I think this is the best looking NTSC version yet. C-3PO is the goldest in yours but not at the cost of having red skinned people. Would have liked to see a shot including the rebel trooper but thats ok. Sound is pretty good also.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: Doctor M
That's a 7-pass vbr, now how do I make CCE go all the way to 11? Pointless IMO, after 2 passes it's a case of dimishing returns. For a laserdisc source, I don't think there's any advantage in doing more than 3 passes. Even for a DVD source, 5-6 passes is considered about the maximum.
Originally posted by: Doctor M
Let me know what you think, and be honest, this IS for posterity. To bright, to yellow, too much border, etc.
Really kicking myself about the colour saturation. It looks so much better with just a little increase (I have to turn the colour up on my TV every time I watch my discs!)

I think you're wrong to do what you've done with the borders. If it was me, I'd just shrink everything vertically by 16.67% to give 480 lines (with about 360 for the actual video picture).

And just an idea for you: for the halos, you might want to try the FixVHSOversharp Avisynth filter. It looks like it's the sort of thing that the video needs, but I think it's designed for VCD, it might not be developed enough to work with full-resolution DVD video.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Doctor M
Does anyone have the chapter cuts for this as well (French and DC)?
M, do you have Gonzo's ESB by chance ? Here's DC side-flips, along with Gonzo's chapter numbers:

Side 1:
16. The Rebels prepare to leave

Side 2:
17. A call to arms
34. A hyperdrive solution

Side 3:
35. A kiss is just a kiss
45. Admiral Piett deploys the fleet

Side 4:
46. The Falcon floats away
59. Luke shadows the prisoners

Side 5:
60. A meeting in the carbon-freeze chamber

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time
Segaflip: Do you mean this guy: http://aptirrelevance.com/otscreenshots/screenshots.php?shot=4? If so I'll grab a screenshot of him for you.

Moth3r: Yeah, I'm agnozing over the borders, and if so how much. I'm curious if anyone has burned these and tried it on a TV. I'm not sure my TV just has a large overscan region or not.
(Edit: I took a look at the filter, I'm not sure I like how it softens the picture too. The other problem is I'm using VirtualDubMod and frameserving to CCE and they don't seem to have a VD version of the filter.)

Darth: great, now I if someone has the French PAL side changes...

Dr. M

Author
Time
One flamboyant rebel, now with less make-up:
http://adventureclub.postrock.net/flamboyant.jpg

Not too different from Moth3r's since I didn't touch the red intensity.

Dr. M

Author
Time
Pretty pointless project really this. And I must concur with moth3r, those borders are a bad idea as far as future proofing is concerned.
Author
Time
We walk a fine line here. On the one side is our goal to preserve the original version of Star Wars we grew up with and loved before things went horribly wrong.

On the other side we also have a desire to sit, watch and enjoy the movies we are attempting to preserve. It is our love for them that has us here to start with after all.

Now I know I am leaning quite far into the latter category with my project, and perhaps I wasn't clear from the start. (Though calling it "Reinventing The Wheel" should tip you off that I am aware of the real necessity of my project.) It's also understood that from a preservation stand-point re-encoding a DVD isn't your finest method.

Think of it as a homage to Moth3r's beautiful transfer, which is perhaps the best of all current and complete sets that have been made.

I started this because I want to be able to watch and enjoy his fine work from my sofa, away from my PC. I only have a NTSC DVD player, and I saw a few tweaks that might elevated the movies further. That's why I set about producing these discs for myself. Public release will only be a side-effect since just about anyone could do this (or their interpretation) on their own.

Am I preserving the OT for future generations? Not well I'm not. That's a conscious decision. Heck, my current set of laserdiscs are of the "Incredible Shrinking Aspect-Ratio" set, not exactly one worth remembering.

If your goal is pure preservation, you could grab Cowclop's latest masterpiece, get the original Moth3r set if PAL is your bent, donate to the X0 project, or buy some hardware and start your own archive edition.

I am perfectly aware that what I have done will be obsolete (maybe even before I finish), but that isn't the point. (Look for a possible v2.0 after Citizen has his say). I've never made a secret of my general dislike for the quality of almost all current transfers for one reason or another. What I want is the best home viewing experience I can muster with what is available and not starting from scratch. The PAL resolution of Moth3r's was a great starting point.

And that's why the black bars, that's why the color and brightness tweaks. Are they correct decisions? Maybe not. That's why I'm so willing to take input from people that aren't partially color blind (as I am) or probably just plain know more than I do. Is it pleasing to watch from my sofa? Oh, yes it is.

So I agree 100% that I could have done more to preserve the series, but there are better people than I already doing it. If that's what you want than these are not the discs you're looking for.

BUT deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall.

Dr. M

Author
Time
That being said I think the general consensus is that things look good and I should get going on the final steps.

As far as the borders go, I guess I will ask the group here since most people seem to disapprove.

I will be definitely be encoding my own copy with the borders. If the demand is overwhelming (for those that will actually WANT a copy), I can make the released version without them.

Ok so poll time. For clarity sake refer to them as TV friendly (with picture framing) or Monitor friendly (no additional borders).

Dr. M

Author
Time
Part of the reason that I get a hold of every set is to see what the creator of that set thought was the best move to do. So with that said I would like to see the final film the way you see it.
Author
Time
Originally posted by: eros
Pretty pointless project really this.
You're a pretty pointless member. I don't think I've ever seen you post anything constructive.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
I'd vote for no additional borders - not because I want a copy (my PAL copy is fine for me, as long as the colour is turned up on the TV) but because I know you'll get flak if you release the version with huge borders.

Actually, I'll try putting your video onto a RW to see what it looks like on a TV.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Looks pretty good. From the video on page one, faces still seem a little too red, but this isn't the case for the last screenshot you posted.
Author
Time
Dr. M,

I burned your test file to a DVD and watched it on my TV last night. I haven't seen a lot of the transfers here, but yours looked pretty good. The overscan on my TV completely ate all of the border on the right side. Only a small part of the black border remained on the left. Apparently, my TV's image is not centered. I have a (crappy?) 29" Zenith from '97.

If you crop the image to eliminate the borders, won't you in effect be zooming in on the image? Won't that make the limited resolution of the laserdisc more apparent?

Also in your test file, I noticed for 3 or 4 seconds at the beginning there was a lot of signal noise in the starfield. After it went away, the starfield looked very clear though. Don't know if anyone else experienced that.

I say, go with the TV friendly borders.

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Moth3r
Originally posted by: eros
Pretty pointless project really this.
You're a pretty pointless member. I don't think I've ever seen you post anything constructive.


That's rich coming from a fuckin' newbie bastard!! I was posting constructive stuff on this forum before your mum bought you your first computer ARSEHOLE!!
Author
Time
Erikstormtrooper: Yeah, my dad's TV is slightly off center too and gives a fractional sliver of black down one side, but my other TV covers all of the black up.

As far as the zoom(?) I am of course trying to counter the cropping already done to the movie. But yeah, the down side is a reduced number of actual lines used for the picture. But although it's much less lines than Moth3r's disc, since it is anamorphic it still contains more lines than the original laserdisc source (I think).
Does anyone know the number of actual lines used in a PAL 2.35:1 laserdisc? I think I'm going to go do some calculations on that this afternoon I don't want less...

As far as the break up, I didn't notice, but that clip is several pieces edited together, so there might be some problems from that. I'll check that too.

Dr. M

Author
Time
Originally posted by: Doctor M
Does anyone know the number of actual lines used in a PAL 2.35:1 laserdisc?
324.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Are you sure? I came up with 288 when I calculated.
Hmm, anyway I am allowing 328 lines for the picture as it is. Now that is somewhat artificial since it has already been enlarged and now I'm reducing it, but whichever number is right (and I'm going to assume it's Moth3r) I'm still slightly larger so there should be minimal if any loss of the original pal resolution when I'm done.

Btw, Moth3r please get back to me on the 8 vs 4 lines thing in PM.

Dr. M

Author
Time
It should be more than 320 lines for PAL, and around 277 lines for NTSC.
Author
Time
As long as I'm throwing everything open to debate. Quien es mas macho for resizing downward: bilinear of lanczos(3)?
I've done a lot of Googling and found a lot of conflicting opinions. Bilnear is frequently said to be best for shrink, but lanczos is accept to produce sharper results. Sight, every time I think I'm nearly done, I find another fine point to hash out first.

Dr. M

Author
Time
I'd use an S-spline based system for resizing, but otherwise Lancoz is usually sharper and has more options, bilinear is fine if you don't want sharpening or are running a separate sharpen pass.
The real answer is try it on your fottage and see - different footage can have its own issues with various resizing methods - the amount of noise in the source picture can really effect things for instance.