logo Sign In

Anime talk — Page 13

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Earl said:
what do you consider “good” anime?

Ghost in the Shell
Cowboy Bebop
Akira
Mononoke Hime
Stranger: Mukou Hadan

etc.

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

And bad anime is redundant.

That is why I only watch good anime.

Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.

Since good anime is impossible, the only truth is that all anime is bad.

Author
Time

Wow, that’s the best you’ve got? Very disappointing. You must be struggling with your brain function today.

Author
Time

Smithers said:

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

Wow, that’s the best you’ve got? Very disappointing. You must be struggling with your brain function today.

My my, how the tables have turned LOL

Right about now I’m picturing imperialscum struggling to figure out his taxes.

You’re welcome, everyone else!

Author
Time

So why is all anime so bad?

Author
Time

If you don’t understand that anime is unacceptable, you don’t understand what unacceptable means.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I do understand what it means. I just think you don’t understand what it means.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

I do understand what it means. I just think you don’t understand what it means.

Now I think you don’t know what “understand” means.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

I do understand what it means. I just think you don’t understand what it means.

Now I think you don’t know what “understand” means.

You have refused to answer my question. And, no, your half-answer doesn’t count.

Author
Time

I’m not sure why you think I have any insight into what makes someone create such objectively terrible art.

Author
Time

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

Author
Time

yhwx said:

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.

Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?

Author
Time

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.

Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?

No one who saw them would ask this.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.

Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?

No one who saw them would ask this.

Yes, many have. It’s important to understand what’s wrong with something before just saying ‘it’s bad.’ Besides, it was a rhetorical question.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

But herein lies the question: Why do you think it’s so objectively terrible? Nothing is so perfect that it can’t be complained about.

I have no opinion about it - there’s no “why I think it’s objectively terrible.” That’s what makes it objectively terrible, rather than subjectively terrible.

Why are the prequels such objectively bad movies?

No one who saw them would ask this.

Yes, many have. It’s important to understand what’s wrong with something before just saying ‘it’s bad.’ Besides, it was a rhetorical question.

If it was a rhetorical question, I wouldn’t have answered it.

But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

But you’re right, I should have said “no one who is a thinking person would ask this.”

Yes, they would. That is the definition of critical thought.