logo Sign In

3D STAR WARS for the masses...has ARRIVED! — Page 26

Author
Time

walking_carpet said:

i normally don't like to use anecdotal evidence, but at a superbowl party with a sharp 65' screen, we saw the commercial for the movie.  nobody booed or gave it a bronx cheer but a couple guys said 'with this big tv, why bother seeing it in the theatre? don't need the 3d".  the battleship and gi joe movies got more jeers.  surprisingly, not much enthusiasm for John Carter (man, did that commercial remind me of AOTC).

i mentioned earlier that the recent blu ray releases may put a damper on attendance - another factor is with big tvs becoming mainstream, maybe people won't care to go?

i wonder if we are going to reach a tipping point for cosumers preferring to watch movies at home because the flatscreens are large enough? ticket sales were down from 2010 to 2011 - but that was because of avatar.

anyways, i don't know what opening weekend grosses will be, but overall running I say absolute rock bottom $12 million and no more than $35 million.  Im using the lion king and BATB releases as a guide.

damn, im tired.  time for bed

John Carter I'm kind of interested in. PIXAR have always been real great artists and I like Stanton's work and it's based on a classic book. The Disney logo makes one worry and the trailers haven't been impressive, but I'll give it a shot.

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.”

Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

 He probably doesn't rationally know why his films were genius anymore than he knows why his other films are so dissapointing.

 i think he knows. he ended the Making of TPM book by saying "for every perosn that likes star wars, 3 people will hate it". WTF!?  then he did all those 'interviews' preceding the premiere saying how everyone hates him, etc.  it was all cover because he knew the movie was bad. 

the problem is - for a great deal of classic moments, characters, designs etc -  he wasn't actively and as intimately involved in the creations, so he cannot recreate it even if he knows what he is seeing.  The score is I think the greatest example.  Credit him for wanting a symphonic score as opposed to synthesized music that was trendy in the 70s.  but he didn't expect in a million years for john williams to come up with THAT.  any symphonic score would have been fine and thats why we have all those annoying cut/paste jobs in the PT :(

plus the fact he almost certainly does not care and will continue to infantilize SW and just aim for lowest, easiest common denominator :(

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

That but also include long discussions about tax and beheadings, immolations, infanticide etc.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

walking_carpet said:

TheBoost said:

 He probably doesn't rationally know why his films were genius anymore than he knows why his other films are so dissapointing.

 i think he knows. he ended the Making of TPM book by saying "for every perosn that likes star wars, 3 people will hate it". WTF!?  then he did all those 'interviews' preceding the premiere saying how everyone hates him, etc.  it was all cover because he knew the movie was bad. 

the problem is - for a great deal of classic moments, characters, designs etc -  he wasn't actively and as intimately involved in the creations, so he cannot recreate it even if he knows what he is seeing.  The score is I think the greatest example.  Credit him for wanting a symphonic score as opposed to synthesized music that was trendy in the 70s.  but he didn't expect in a million years for john williams to come up with THAT.  any symphonic score would have been fine and thats why we have all those annoying cut/paste jobs in the PT :(

plus the fact he almost certainly does not care and will continue to infantilize SW and just aim for lowest, easiest common denominator :(

I think he actually wanted Williams to use either classical pieces a la 2001, or Korngold's music from stuff like Captain Blood. And then Williams said he could do something like that but original and better and he came back with the SW score. I'm probably mixing up the details but that's sort of how that happened. And it's an important point you bring up. The same thing applies to guys like Ben Burtt and McQuarrie--Lucas can be credited for recognizing their talent and giving them a good direction to go in, which is why his early stuff was so good, but he never in a million years expected what they came back with. Star Wars is largely a film of serendipity that could never have been forseen, which was why no one at the beginning, including Lucas, expected it to be good. If you played them Williams score, showed them ILM footage with Ben Burtt's sound effects and McQuarrie's designs, and of course the human actors who had such chemistry, I bet a lot more people would have said "this is going to wow everyone."

Author
Time

Infanticide means the killing of small children.

Killing newborn babies is Neonaticide that only happens Lucasianly in Willow.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

I think he actually wanted Williams to use either classical pieces a la 2001, or Korngold's music from stuff like Captain Blood. And then Williams said he could do something like that but original and better and he came back with the SW score. I'm probably mixing up the details but that's sort of how that happened.

 for the 1995 vhs releases, he told leonard maltin that he writes his screenplays to music.  he wrote this on one of the CD releases as well.  But the PT footage of him writing doesn't have any music playing in the background. not to mention it sort of conflicts his 'non-linear 3 dimensional editing' philosophy.

was this yet another lie? or another exaggeration - like how we all listen to our ipods when working, but thats not the same thing as 'writing to music'.

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

Mike O said:

walking_carpet said:

i normally don't like to use anecdotal evidence, but at a superbowl party with a sharp 65' screen, we saw the commercial for the movie.  nobody booed or gave it a bronx cheer but a couple guys said 'with this big tv, why bother seeing it in the theatre? don't need the 3d".  the battleship and gi joe movies got more jeers.  surprisingly, not much enthusiasm for John Carter (man, did that commercial remind me of AOTC).

i mentioned earlier that the recent blu ray releases may put a damper on attendance - another factor is with big tvs becoming mainstream, maybe people won't care to go?

i wonder if we are going to reach a tipping point for cosumers preferring to watch movies at home because the flatscreens are large enough? ticket sales were down from 2010 to 2011 - but that was because of avatar.

anyways, i don't know what opening weekend grosses will be, but overall running I say absolute rock bottom $12 million and no more than $35 million.  Im using the lion king and BATB releases as a guide.

damn, im tired.  time for bed

John Carter I'm kind of interested in. PIXAR have always been real great artists and I like Stanton's work and it's based on a classic book. The Disney logo makes one worry and the trailers haven't been impressive, but I'll give it a shot.

It can only be a hundred times better than the SciFi channel version that aired last year. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

I love how ImpFight is playing with the title of the thread. Maybe it can just be "The Star Wars 3D Thread"?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

There are Lucas interview bits running on the FX channel today, if anyone's interested.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Tobar said:

bkev said:

Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

 

ImperialFighter said:

George doesn't like 3D That 'comes out at you' from the screen (!)

The skeptic in me wonders if he "doesn't like" that sort of 3D because he can't do it with the source material he has.  Because that statement is inconsistent with Sy Snootles' ROTJ Special Edition lips.

I'm going to have to disagree based on the new Star Tours.  Outside of one shot, at least on my path, the 3D was more about depth and perspective than shock and amazement with things popping out at you.  That project suggests that he actually means it when he says he's not crazy about 3D as a spectacle, but more as an enhancement.

You're inside a ship on that ride. You can't have stuff popping out at you all the time unless you're supposed to be sucked out into space. The only appropriate time to have something pop out at you is if it literally bursts through the cockpit window.

Which is how the ride ends, so I still call bullshit.

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Of the handful of times I rode it that only happened twice and it was always Naboo. It was definitely my favorite ending. So what are you calling bull on?

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Ah yeah I haven't seen any evidence of that other than the fact that he put John Knoll in charge of the conversion process.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

 

walking_carpet said:


zombie84 said:


I think he actually wanted Williams to use either classical pieces a la 2001, or Korngold's music from stuff like Captain Blood. And then Williams said he could do something like that but original and better and he came back with the SW score. I'm probably mixing up the details but that's sort of how that happened.


for the 1995 vhs releases, he told leonard maltin that he writes his screenplays to music.  he wrote this on one of the CD releases as well.  But the PT footage of him writing doesn't have any music playing in the background. not to mention it sort of conflicts his 'non-linear 3 dimensional editing' philosophy.


was this yet another lie? or another exaggeration - like how we all listen to our ipods when working, but thats not the same thing as 'writing to music'.

 

I'd always assumed that any time we see Lucas writing in one of those documentaries, it's staged. The crew need a few shots of him scribbling stuff so that's what he does.

 

All I really want is each film as it was originally seen and heard in theaters; no fixes, corrections, "improvements" or modifications necessary.

Author
Time

Erikstormtrooper said:

Review of TPM by slantmagazine: http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace/6039

They don't specifically address the 3D, but otherwise this is a great review. Snippet:

Every so often, though, the film surprises you with a visual idea that's both simple and effective: Federation tanks emerging from behind Naboo's rolling green hills, a podracer running on one engine spiraling through the air before crashing, an enormous Gungan shield materializing around their army. But such ideas are uncommon and fleeting, never left long enough to savor, and they are frustratingly counterpointed by idiocy: a ridiculous-looking fish is eaten whole by an even more ridiculous-looking fish, a Gungan leader chortles messily (twice), Anakin yells "yippee!" on at least two occasions, droids incongruously mimic the Three Stooges. The Phantom Menace is irredeemably plagued by such ridiculousness...

I disagree...you can redeem it by making it more ridiculous.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wrong way: starting from cleverness and giveall of it and end in absurdity/ridiculousness (ex: politics)

Right way: starting from absurdity/stupidity and show it in all its magnificence. Thus you may well end with a clever piece of work. (ex: some fictions, cartoons and so on...).

 

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

I think he actually wanted Williams to use either classical pieces a la 2001, or Korngold's music from stuff like Captain Blood. And then Williams said he could do something like that but original and better and he came back with the SW score.

didn't know if this was already mentioned but want to take this moment to wish cinema's greatest composer a Happy 80th Birthday!!

this man is a living treasure.  If you made a top ten list of the most recognizable film scores of all time, he would have at least 5.

click here if lack of OOT got you down

Author
Time

George's letter to short list:

http://www.rebelscum.com/photo.asp?image=http://www.rebelscum.com/2012/Shortlist2.jpg

I saw Star Wars in 1977. Many, many, many times. For 3 years it was just Star Wars...period. I saw it in good theaters, cheap theaters and drive-ins with those clunky metal speakers you hang on your window. The screen and sound quality never subtracted from the excitement. I can watch the original cut right now, over 30 years later, on some beat up VHS tape and enjoy it. It's the story that makes this movie. Nothing? else.

kurtb8474 1 week ago

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=SkAZxd-5Hp8


Author
Time

I really dig that photo they used as a backdrop.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Funny how Lucas' letter about the release of Episode I has a behind-the-scenes photo of an iconic moment from the original film and not the film that is actually being promoted. Guess a picture of Lucas directing Ahmed Best in his Jar Jar suit surrounded by a wall of bluescreen didn't cut it. Lucas continues to use a movie you can't even watch to promote a film few even like.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

And it's also funny, how he says that 3D vs 2D is like colour film vs. black and white. So basically 3D conversion of 2D films is the exact same thing as colourising a B&W film?

Man, that's exactly what I was thinkin'! Surely the ghost of his former self haunts him at night.

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time
 (Edited)

To be fair though, I don't think he has any problem with a director doing anything to their own movie. He's only spoken out when the filmmakers haven't been involved. Ray Harryhausen recently colourized one of his black and white films, to pretty good results. The difference, though, is that Harryhausen made the original version available in the same set. I wonder now: if 3D becomes a permanent element of TV and film--and it could, in the nearish future--would Lucas even offer the 2D versions anymore? And how big would the backlash be if no one could watch the films in 2D anymore? Would his "my vision, my films" rhetoric still hold up to prequel fans?

On the other hand, if he's been anything it's inconsistent. At the same time he was saying the originals won't be sold because they don't represent his vision of the films he was releasing the prequels in pan-and-scan DVD.