logo Sign In

BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES — Page 166

Author
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

yhwx said:

HansiG said:

I don’t like it in both cases.

It’s fine in both cases. Don’t read it if you don’t like it. Problem solved. Don’t police people’s hobbies. Believe it or not, people don’t want to see “realistic” people in escapist entertainment. I don’t want to watch a James Bond movie in which James Bond is played by Jonah Hill and he ends up with this girl in the end:

I don’t know man, that might be a funny movie.

Author
Time

This thread is called "Beautiful Women" not "Sexy Pieces of Ass I Wanna Tap".

It could be about beautiful animals or flowers or clothes or anything! It’s people sharing their opinions on what they find attractive. Honesty, have you been around the Internet, YHWX? The fact that everybody here just posts a picture and pays a compliment in a respectful way says a lot about the general character of the people we have here.

There’s far worse places on the net (which you can easily find) to start asserting yourself against what you think you’re seeing here.

People like things that they find attractive. You like things that you find attractive too. It’s perfectly okay for you to not advertise or share your tastes regarding other human beings but it’s very rude and, dare I say, self-righteous, to repeat a contrary opinion that wasn’t asked for in this thread over and over.

There is no difference between a thread where we express a preference for a movie and a thread where we express a preference for a lady. There just isn’t!

I like you, YHWX, you have a good sense of humour and you’re clearly intelligent. I hope you stick around on this site, because heaven knows we need people like you here, but I wish you’d use a bit more tact sometimes.

All said with a happy face though, it just doesn’t sit well with me when I see people picking the wrong fight 😃

Author
Time

Mark’s Down On Your Syntax said:

This thread is called "Beautiful Women" not "Sexy Pieces of Ass I Wanna Tap".

It could be about beautiful animals or flowers or clothes or anything! It’s people sharing their opinions on what they find attractive. Honesty, have you been around the Internet, YHWX? The fact that everybody here just posts a picture and pays a compliment in a respectful way says a lot about the general character of the people we have here.

There’s far worse places on the net (which you can easily find) to start asserting yourself against what you think you’re seeing here.

People like things that they find attractive. You like things that you find attractive too. It’s perfectly okay for you to not advertise or share your tastes regarding other human beings but it’s very rude and, dare I say, self-righteous, to repeat a contrary opinion that wasn’t asked for in this thread over and over.

There is no difference between a thread where we express a preference for a movie and a thread where we express a preference for a lady. There just isn’t!

I like you, YHWX, you have a good sense of humour and you’re clearly intelligent. I hope you stick around on this site, because heaven knows we need people like you here, but I wish you’d use a bit more tact sometimes.

All said with a happy face though, it just doesn’t sit well with me when I see people picking the wrong fight 😃

Don’t put byname in all caps. 😉

Author
Time

yhwx said:

Mark’s Down On Your Syntax said:

This thread is called "Beautiful Women" not "Sexy Pieces of Ass I Wanna Tap".

It could be about beautiful animals or flowers or clothes or anything! It’s people sharing their opinions on what they find attractive. Honesty, have you been around the Internet, YHWX? The fact that everybody here just posts a picture and pays a compliment in a respectful way says a lot about the general character of the people we have here.

There’s far worse places on the net (which you can easily find) to start asserting yourself against what you think you’re seeing here.

People like things that they find attractive. You like things that you find attractive too. It’s perfectly okay for you to not advertise or share your tastes regarding other human beings but it’s very rude and, dare I say, self-righteous, to repeat a contrary opinion that wasn’t asked for in this thread over and over.

There is no difference between a thread where we express a preference for a movie and a thread where we express a preference for a lady. There just isn’t!

I like you, YHWX, you have a good sense of humour and you’re clearly intelligent. I hope you stick around on this site, because heaven knows we need people like you here, but I wish you’d use a bit more tact sometimes.

All said with a happy face though, it just doesn’t sit well with me when I see people picking the wrong fight 😃

Don’t put byname in all caps. 😉

BYNAME

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Lauren Lee Smith

A relatively minor Canadian actress, with nothing very notable under her belt. That being said, I had a major crush on her back around 2003-2005. She’s still very cute in my eyes, but I find her a tad too skinny for my tastes these days.

And now I don’t find her cute at all.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Jean Simmons

Since I watched Black Narcissus for the second time last summer, I find myself periodically wandering back to this woman. She truly was a living work of art, and I really need to put more effort into seeing her other movies.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, yeah, but I don’t want to go running around announcing it to the world. What would Frink say if I did?

Author
Time

DE, at least this time you were on topic with the photo.

真実

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Well, yeah, but I don’t want to go running around announcing it to the world. What would Frink say if I did?

Don’t worry, we all know you want to hump anything with [REDACTED].

Author
Time

BETTY LOU GERSON

Who knew Cruella de Vil was quite the looker in real life?