
- Time
- Post link
I think we used to be able to turn off images in signatures. Hopefully that will be implemented in the new forum software at some point.
I think we used to be able to turn off images in signatures. Hopefully that will be implemented in the new forum software at some point.
Yes, because giving people choices it a bad thing. Hey, next why don’t we disable avatars too because people will have to be subjected to see them plastered all over the place as well?
ray_afraid said:
How 'bout no pic at all since it adds nothing to you, but it’s something we all have to see plastered all over the place?How 'bout it’s my profile and I will make changes to it as I please. Thank you for your consideration though.
Sure, edit my post so I sound like a demanding ass. Also, give some arrogant, condescending attitude while your at it.
Ah, good job.
That pic does make you seem cool though…
So don’t loose that.
You did sound like a demanding ass. Taking out the other sentence doesn’t do anything to make your post seem any nicer. Plus that sentence is what I was directly responding to. I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.
I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.
Meaning you’re really interested in why?
Look, I know you’re easily riled and I “shrugged” to say “no big deal either way”.
Continue with this fit if ya wanna. I truly couldn’t care any less.
I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.
Meaning you’re really interested in why?
Look, I know you’re easily riled and I “shrugged” to say “no big deal either way”.
Continue with this fit if ya wanna. I truly couldn’t care any less.
I don’t care why you think the way you think. That’s why I omitted the shit in the first place. Also I’m so “riled” because do you see me going around commenting on the way people should dress, how their hair and body should look, what they should read, listen to, watch or what to do with their profile? No, I don’t. And if you didn’t truly care you wouldn’t have come at me like a demanding and entitled ass.
I never told you what you can/can’t or should/shouldn’t have on your profile. I just said I don’t understand that need (especially when Wook is always having to tell people to shrink their images). It wasn’t a swipe at you or anybody else.
I also didn’t ask why you were riled up about this, I just said that I know you’re easily riled, so I added a “shrug” as way of saying “it don’t matter none.”
But,
ray_afraid said:
Continue with this fit if ya wanna. I truly couldn’t care any less.
I never told you what you can/can’t or should/shouldn’t have on your profile.
ray_afraid said:
How 'bout no pic at all since it adds nothing to you, but it’s something we all have to see plastered all over the place?
You serious?
And to be frank it’s not the message you’re trying to convey it’s the way you said it. The “How 'bout” makes you seem like an ass especially when there was literally no provocation that led to you saying that. Had you written it differently we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
You can chuck it to me and I’ll crop it if you want.
I didn’t go to university for six years for nothing!
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
This is how misunderstandings turn into flame fests. The only flames I want to see are from a holiday BBQ.
Where were you in '77?
You can chuck it to me and I’ll crop it if you want.
I didn’t go to university for six years for nothing!
Thank you in advance.
Yes, because giving people choices it a bad thing. Hey, next why don’t we disable avatars too because people will have to be subjected to see them plastered all over the place as well?
Slow down there buddy.
We had the option to keep people’s sig images to showing up for us. It affected you not one bit, unless you somehow think it’s critical I see your sig image.
I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.
Meaning you’re really interested in why?
Look, I know you’re easily riled and I “shrugged” to say “no big deal either way”.
Continue with this fit if ya wanna. I truly couldn’t care any less.I don’t care why you think the way you think. That’s why I omitted the shit in the first place. Also I’m so “riled” because do you see me going around commenting on the way people should dress, how their hair and body should look, what they should read, listen to, watch or what to do with their profile? No, I don’t. And if you didn’t truly care you wouldn’t have come at me like a demanding and entitled ass.
Yes, because giving people choices it a bad thing. Hey, next why don’t we disable avatars too because people will have to be subjected to see them plastered all over the place as well?
Slow down there buddy.
We had the option to keep people’s sig images to showing up for us. It affected you not one bit, unless you somehow think it’s critical I see your sig image.
Actually that sounds like a good idea. That gives people even more options 😄
Seriously, what is this?
The meaning of life
How can the meaning of life be a long-dead meme? Really, the meme died long ago. Find some fresher memes. Free yourself from the frog’s meme hell.
.
suspiciouscoffee said:
How can the meaning of life be a long-dead meme? Really, the meme died long ago. Find some fresher memes. Free yourself from the frog’s meme hell.
NEVER!
I prefer Dead Bart, myself (But not Bart the General; that meme sucks.).
I thought the Warcraft movie was animated. I just saw a new tv spot and there are live action humans.
It looks terrible!
Not that I had any interest either way, but I’m surprised that the long awaited film to such a huge franchise has such poor cgi. I mean, it looked fine when I thought it was supposed to look like an animated film, but I guess they think it all looks real…
Too much time playing video games and not enough interaction with the real outside world?
If I could make my own Fantastic Four movie, and could use any actor from any period in history, here’s who I’d cast:
Kevin McCarthy (c. 1960) as Reed Richards AKA Mr. Fantastic
Christina Applegate (early 2000s) as Sue Storm AKA Invisible Woman
Beau Bridges (early '80s) as Ben Grimm AKA the Thing
Michael Biehn ('80s) as Johnny Storm AKA the Human Torch
Chris Sarandon ('70s/'80s/'90s, doesn’t matter) as Dr. Victor von Doom
Duh-nuh-nuh-nuhhhhhhhhhh.
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
I thought the Warcraft movie was animated. I just saw a new tv spot and there are live action humans.
It looks terrible!
Not that I had any interest either way, but I’m surprised that the long awaited film to such a huge franchise has such poor cgi. I mean, it looked fine when I thought it was supposed to look like an animated film, but I guess they think it all looks real…
Too much time playing video games and not enough interaction with the real outside world?
As someone who has never played the games, I saw the trailer when I went to see another movie and I asked my brother “Is this supposed to be Shrek: Origins?”
Then we saw the humans and the eventual title card and we both agreed that it was much, much worse than we feared.
.
Duh-nuh-nuh-nuhhhhhhhhhh.
Thank you very much
I could give a fuck.
By all means, do then.
Shouldn’t it be "I couldn’t give a f*ck?
Not enough people read the EU.
I dunno
It should be: “I couldn’t give” if you are meaning to say that you don’t care.
The Person in Question