- Time
- Post link
I give the solid star a 8/10 and the transparent star a 7/10.
.
Ranking the Star Wars films — Page 26
- Time
- Post link
What comes up when I post these to you?
★
☆
For me one is a solid star, and another is a transparent star. What are you seeing?LuckyGungan2001; always asking the important questions.
Because he’s a star. ☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
- Time
- Post link
Ah, so you see them?
Not enough people read the EU.
- Time
- Post link
No, we’re all guessing.
- Time
- Post link
Yes, we see them lol. Anyway what was your point?
Prequel Fan-Edit thread: http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Yet-another-series-of-prequel-edits/id/17329
- Time
- Post link
Yes, I certainly see them, which is funny considering I can’t see 99% of all other emotions.
- Time
- Post link
THOSE AREN’T EMOTIONS
- Time
- Post link
Yes, we see them lol. Anyway what was your point?
Just checking, that’s all.
Not enough people read the EU.
- Time
- Post link
Seems like something that definitely needed to be checked in this specific thread.
- Time
- Post link
THOSE AREN’T EMOTIONS
They will be … they will be …
- Time
- Post link
- ROTS: 8/10
- TFA: 7.5/10
- ESB: 7/10
- ANH: 7/10
- ROTJ: 6.5/10
- TPM: 6/10
- AOTC: 5/10
- Time
- Post link
I just can’t even take it.
- Time
- Post link
TFA is great and all but it’s no ESB. I dare to say that they’re not even on the same level.
- Time
- Post link
No they aren’t. TESB is a clear 10/10, and TFA gets 8/10 in my books.
Not enough people read the EU.
- Time
- Post link
Empire Strikes Back is great and all, but it’s no Revenge of the Sith.
Empire Strikes Back: 7/10
Revenge of the Sith: 12/10
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I don’t understand why anyone would like ROTS but not like the other two prequels. It’s just more of the same, with some OT stuff at the end.
The Person in Question
- Time
- Post link
I don’t understand why anyone would like ROTS but not like the other two prequels. It’s just more of the same, with some OT stuff at the end.
Well, I liked all 7 so far, but there’s just some I like least. AOTC is the only one I’d truly rate as mediocre out of all 7 hence the “5/10.”
Just wasn’t too engaged for AOTC while with the other SW movies I had varying levels of engagement. Still, it was enough to find enjoyable and I include it in rewatches, though usually I skip past a scene or two.
- Time
- Post link
*groan*
- Time
- Post link
TPM=ROTS, both get 5/10 in my opinion. Attack of the Clones is just terrible. Terribly acted, terribly scripted, terribly paced, terribly shot, and terribly edited. The plot might be good in theory, but it is executed very poorly. 2/10, time to update my ratings list.
Not enough people read the EU.
- Time
- Post link
SW = 10/10
ESB = 9.5/10
ROTJ = 8/10
TFA = 7/10
The Rest Are Crap.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I don’t understand why anyone would like ROTS but not like the other two prequels. It’s just more of the same, with some OT stuff at the end.
I don’t agree: it’s the same stuff, ok, but it works better. There are less ridiculous scenes, the sfx are far superior, the aesthetic is quite impressive, Coruscant for once looks like a torn city, the score is a masterpiece, action scenes are well done, the actors are good (really, except the Darth Sidious part which is lame). Only the key scenes are problematic (even a failed scene such as Yoda v Sidious contains great shots and ideas), everything else is actually quite good. Not OT quality, of course, but close enough. I still would rank TFA higher than ROTS, but not by a very long shot (because Daisy Ridley is such a terrible actress - I’m not talking about the character, but the performance is by far the weakest thing of the movie. Not her entire fault though, JJ Abrams was supposed to direct her on the set and apparently he did not try to challenge her).
- Time
- Post link
MalàStrana said:
because Daisy Ridley is such a terrible actress
I think we use different dictionaries…
- Time
- Post link
Dude, we know you’re a big TFA fan. Some people aren’t. Get over it.
- Time
- Post link
You’re acting like I started blurting obscenities at you when I just merely disagreed. Can you relax buddy?
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
You’re acting like I started blurting obscenities at you when I just merely disagreed. Can you relax buddy?
Every time someone writes something about TFA that’s not to your taste, you suddendly appear. You’ve put some kind of “alert” on this forum I guess. I didn’t know that “Dude, we know you’re a big TFA fan. Some people aren’t. Get over it” could be taken as an outburst, that’s new. But we can talk about being relax, I just don’t think you’ve got any lessons to provide in that matter.
edit: the dictionary I use: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/dictionnaire/anglais/terrible
“of low quality”. My thoughts exactly about Daisy Ridley performance.