logo Sign In

Post #911321

Author
Jetrell Fo
Parent topic
Team Negative1
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/911321/action/topic#911321
Date created
23-Feb-2016, 5:59 PM

Williarob said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Regardless of the gravity of this individual situation, I think it was the straw that broke the camel’s back for N1. Absurd posts were being made constantly by the team account (and some clearly by negative 1 himself) with no regard for the forum rules. He also constantly ignored his many warnings for posting outside of TN1 threads. That alone (in my opinion of course) was enough for a ban just given how he had no respect for the rules or leeway TN1 was given.

No argument from me here. And if that the mods would like to make that the reason for the ban, I’ll go to bed happy. But I’m still seeking an apology for the accusation that we behaved unethically. Because that is Not true.

This should not be an issue either after this went on …

TV’s Frink said:

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/What-does-Lucasfilm-or-George-Lucas-really-have-as-Reference-Material/id/47412

Oops! I meant…

Jay did put a stop to it but Frink did not get banned.

Sorry Frink, I had a hard time defending their ban over posts when I remembered your antics going on after the rule was made for said chiding.

And btw Frink, did you applaud Willarobs transparency earlier in this thread but now you’re questioning it? I know you love contradictions but I’m not sure this was a good one to establish considering the possible implications of this issue.

Just saying bud, not trying come off mean.

😃