logo Sign In

The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS ** — Page 38

Author
Time

Yoda Is Your Father said:

Just out of curiosity, are you a filmmaker?

I only ask because you’re throwing out some pretty big opinions, and I’m curious about your credentials.

For the record, I make TV commercials. Admittedly I don’t make films, but it’s the same ballpark. I write the scripts, then oversee every stage of production. I choose the director and work closely with them during pre-prod and on set, I sit in on casting and have final say on actors, I oversee the edit, post and sound (all while juggling client and audience considerations and concerns). Although my ‘storytelling’ is confined to a couple of minutes, rather than full length features, I do like to think that years in the industry have

And you know what?.. I would NEVER pipe up about how terrible the editing was on a Star Wars movie. Sure, I might say I don’t like it, or this and that bit sucked, but real, granular filmmaking critique?.. I’m simply not qualified, and I know how amazingly hard it is to balance every voice in the room and still end up with a finished product that makes sense and entertains people.

The director of every film you’ve ever seen, even the bad ones, deserves respect simply for getting a movie made and released in the first place. That doesn’t mean we can’t critique it (that’s part of the fun), but it always amazes me how easy people think it is, and how everybody thinks they can do better.

So are you a filmmaker? I’d love to see some of your work.

Are you ready for some real fun?

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/890436

Author
Time
 (Edited)

brash_stryker said:

ZkinandBonez said:

brash_stryker said:

LexX said:

hydrospanner said:

Apparently George is criticizing the film for being a “retro movie”

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/dec/31/george-lucas-attacks-retro-star-wars-the-force-awakens

Well, you can’t really say he doesn’t have a point there.

Edit: and I only mean it being a somewhat “retro”, not all the crap he’s saying about SW being a soap opera etc.

Well let’s be fair, George didn’t even go ‘retro’ when he blatantly should have (in the films set before the OT) so I find it very hard to take the guy seriously. He just seems bitter.

Why exactly should he have gone retro in the PT though?
It’s set thirty-ish years earlier, so naturally it should look very different. He may not have made the best design-choices but at least he wasn’t just copying himself completely. The failure of those films were the horrible writing and contrived plots, not that it wasn’t OT enough.

I agree with you to an extent. Those films are broken in terms of writing right out of the gate. But even if they weren’t, it would still have a problem with the lack of connections. They should have had the same “used universe” feel, but they didn’t. But it’s not all about aesthetic. It’s to do with ensuring that your story, setting and key plot points have a direct connection to the ‘Retro’. For instance…

Alderaan should have featured more prominently (not just in a brief montage at the end of the 3rd film) so the audience would give a shit about its destruction in ANH. That would have allowed the story to flow organically from one trilogy into the next, rather than feeling entirely separate.

Speaking of planets though, Tatooine actually featured too prominently. How many times did we need to go back there exactly? It would have been enough to establish that Owen lived there and urged Anakin to “stay there” with him rather than go with Obi Wan on the “idealistic crusade”. It would have been up to the writer the circumstances of how Anakin and Owen found themselves on Tatooine. But no, let’s make it so that Anakin only met him once AFTER having gone away and there was no “crusade” at all, and it wasn’t even Obi Wan that took him. It was Qui Gon.

Likewise, let’s replace a “great starpilot” with a little kid who drives a ground-level chariot.

Yoda trained Obi Wan? Nah. Let’s just switch it so that Qui Gon did.

Anakin was a good friend? Let’s make him an asshole.

He was “seduced” by the dark side? Let’s make it a conscious decision to save his wife.

Leia remembers her mother, you say? Well we can’t have that. Let’s kill her during childbirth!

I’m not averse to there having been new stuff in the Prequels. Of course, there had to be. But the overall aesthetic as well as specific details ought to have connected with ANH. at least a bit. There was none of the ‘used universe’ in the Prequels, and as mentioned above, key details just didn’t align. The term ‘retro’ doesn’t just apply to the look of it.

Right, I think I just read your comment slightly wrong. I completely agree that he should have made it feel more like it belonged in the same fictional universe, e.g. as you mentioned making it look more “lived in.” Many of the designs are far to shiny and futuristic looking to be set before the events of the OT. Having said that I do like a lot of the designs, especially in TPM. The story wasn’t much to praise, and the characters ranged from boring to intolerable, but the world felt and looked properly Star Wars-y. It felt kind of “lived-in” but still looked somewhat new in that it was a prosperous time, as supposed to a time of galactic tyranny in the OT.
But yes, Lucas’ did oddly enough re-do things that didn’t need to be re-done (e.g. Tatooine) and like you said he ignored what shouldn’t have been ignored (e.g. Alderaan).
I give Lucas credit for trying something new, but I give him criticism for not doing it particularly well and consistently. TFA is for me the exact opposite of the PT, I give them credit for the writing and the characters, as well as consistency, but I also think they could have been more original. However I’ll take similar-but-fun over different-but-boring any day.

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novels.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Alderaan said:

First, I’m curious why you think it matters whether someone is a filmmaker or not when they offer criticism? There are critics who get paid for a living to critique films. They are professionals at it, and yet they don’t make any films themselves. There are countless other people who simply watch films and have a taste for what they see and what they like. Is their opinion and the way they express it any less valid?

Nope, all opinions are valid. I just reacted to your very specific points and wondered if you maybe had a background in film making. Call it professional curiosity. No offence or condescension intended.

Alderaan said:

As for the rest of this, you seem to be chiding me not so much for my admittedly excessive word choice, but more because I had the audacity to offer specific critiques. Is that right? I simply cannot understand where you are coming from, since this is a discussion thread about the film. If you disagree with me, then let’s discuss in good faith.

Apologies, I wasn’t chiding. I was just wondering where the very specific improvements you were suggesting were coming from as they seemed beyond the usual ‘this film is teh suck’ internet comments. You’ve said you’re a screenwriter and you’re also in the middle of making you first documentary, so now I know (good luck with your documentary by the way).

Alderaan said:

All kidding aside, I liked the commercial and thought it was well done.

Thanks. I posted my website purely to give some context as to why I was mouthing off about the intricacies of filmmaking and why I try not to criticise or rubbish other people’s work… although obviously as a Star Wars geek, prequel-hater and internet forum member that’s not entirely true 😉 I’m as opinionated as the next guy.

War does not make one great.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

On Golden Pond? I’d rather watch Attack of the Clones again.

Philistine! On Golden Pond is a masterpiece! No wonder you rate tfa so highly!

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Yoda Is Your Father said:

Just out of curiosity, are you a filmmaker?

I only ask because you’re throwing out some pretty big opinions, and I’m curious about your credentials.

For the record, I make TV commercials. Admittedly I don’t make films, but it’s the same ballpark. I write the scripts, then oversee every stage of production. I choose the director and work closely with them during pre-prod and on set, I sit in on casting and have final say on actors, I oversee the edit, post and sound (all while juggling client and audience considerations and concerns). Although my ‘storytelling’ is confined to a couple of minutes, rather than full length features, I do like to think that years in the industry have

And you know what?.. I would NEVER pipe up about how terrible the editing was on a Star Wars movie. Sure, I might say I don’t like it, or this and that bit sucked, but real, granular filmmaking critique?.. I’m simply not qualified, and I know how amazingly hard it is to balance every voice in the room and still end up with a finished product that makes sense and entertains people.

The director of every film you’ve ever seen, even the bad ones, deserves respect simply for getting a movie made and released in the first place. That doesn’t mean we can’t critique it (that’s part of the fun), but it always amazes me how easy people think it is, and how everybody thinks they can do better.

So are you a filmmaker? I’d love to see some of your work.

Are you ready for some real fun?

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/890436

So…much nitpicking. You can tell this person was not going to like the movie before he/she saw it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

George should just disappear quietly. No one needs to hear from him.

Haha. I’ve said in other threads how I actually feel kind of bad for George the way everybody’s saying how good TFA is and how Star Wars is basically better off without him (not everybody but you know what I mean).

But all this jibba jabba about a soap opera and Star Wars being the story of the Skywalker family or whatever just makes me thankful that the new trilogy has fresh eyes on it. I mean, maybe in his head that’s what it is, but…

War does not make one great.

Author
Time

Why would anyone go to see a film wanting to hate it? A good film is a good film. Tfa is not a good film. At least lucas has commented, I think he was polite saying it’s a retro film rather than a blatant rip off!

Author
Time
 (Edited)

My only problem with Leia’s scenes is the editing and position of the resistance base in relation to the stakes of the film.

In the original film (that this one is so clearly stealing from) Leia has by necessity led the Empire to the Rebels, who at that point are the only obstacle to Empire having secured dominance over the galaxy. If the Death Star blows that up it’s won.

The set up in these movies is there are two power blocks. The former Empire now First Order and the New Republic. They seem to be in a cold war situation. In this film the place to get that sense of peril would have been on the Republic capital which might as well been Coruscant in the same way that Rey might as well have been raised on Tatooine. So what we should have seen is a Resistance base insurgent within First Order territory be the test target and Leia on the Republic world having already failed to get the bureaucrats to launch a retaliatory strike risk open war with the First Order by taking her followers in the fleet to attack the base.

That way when the capital is destroyed there is a sense of connection to the place. I barely understood what the place was. In my after viewing report I thought it was Coruscant because it looked like the whole planet was one big city but I needed someone there to tell me.

Also done that way a small section of the Republic fleet survived and became the new resistance to the rise of the First Order.

As for Leia’s face. Honestly the level of overlapping sexism and ageism in nerd circles is a bloody disgrace. It makes me feel ashamed to own small plastic dolls in the shape of aliens and robots it really does.

Author
Time

Well that is a pretty unpopular opinion but if that’s the way you feel good for you. I liked the film. It wasn’t perfect and yes it was similar to ANH but luckily they repackaged it and made it feel new. I was entertained by the film and it makes me want to see where these characters are going to go. It was far better then I expected it to be.

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

As for Leia’s face. Honestly the level of overlapping sexism and ageism in nerd circles is a bloody disgrace. It makes me feel ashamed to own small plastic dolls in the shape of aliens and robots it really does.

Well said.

War does not make one great.

Author
Time

Bosk said:

Why would anyone go to see a film wanting to hate it? A good film is a good film. Tfa is not a good film. At least lucas has commented, I think he was polite saying it’s a retro film rather than a blatant rip off!

Didn’t he say that he really liked it and it was the film that he should have made a couple of weeks ago?

Author
Time

hydrospanner said:

Bosk said:

Why would anyone go to see a film wanting to hate it? A good film is a good film. Tfa is not a good film. At least lucas has commented, I think he was polite saying it’s a retro film rather than a blatant rip off!

Didn’t he say that he really liked it and it was the film that he should have made a couple of weeks ago?

I hope not…even the pt films were functional as films

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

My only problem with Leia’s scenes is the editing and position of the resistance base in relation to the stakes of the film.

In the original film (that this one is so clearly stealing from) Leia has by necessity led the Empire to the Rebels, who at that point are the only obstacle to Empire having secured dominance over the galaxy. If the Death Star blows that up it’s won.

The set up in these movies is there are two power blocks. The former Empire now First Order and the New Republic. They seem to be in a cold war situation. In this film the place to get that sense of peril would have been on the Republic capital which might as well been Coruscant in the same way that Rey might as well have been raised on Tatooine. So what we should have seen is a Resistance base insurgent within First Order territory be the test target and Leia on the Republic world having already failed to get the bureaucrats to launch a retaliatory strike risk open war with the First Order by taking her followers in the fleet to attack the base.

That way when the capital is destroyed there is a sense of connection to the place. I barely understood what the place was. In my after viewing report I thought it was Coruscant because it looked like the whole planet was one big city but I needed someone there to tell me.

Also done that way a small section of the Republic fleet survived and became the new resistance to the rise of the First Order.

There was a scene that was cut in which Leia sends an envoy to the senate on Hosnian Prime that likely would have A.) clarified that it wasn’t Coruscant, and B.) made the planet’s destruction resonate more. It looks like it was shot because there are some stills from it floating around in some of the companion books. I hope it’s included on the Blu-ray, I’d like to see it in a fan edit down the road. Personally, I think striking out at the seat of government immediately rather than testing Starkiller on another target first is useful for characterizing the First Order. These aren’t the banal pencil-pushers of the old Empire, they’re unhinged ideologues trying to make the biggest splash possible. That’s not to say I don’t like your suggestion, I think that would’ve worked well too. I just think the version in the film succeeds at illustrating a certain dynamic.

As for Leia’s face. Honestly the level of overlapping sexism and ageism in nerd circles is a bloody disgrace. It makes me feel ashamed to own small plastic dolls in the shape of aliens and robots it really does.

Alt text

Author
Time

I’ve learned to forgive George Lucas (as if it is my place to forgive Lucas in the first place).

He gave birth to Star Wars. No one else would have. And I think he is well congnizant of the PT’s failings.

Had he helmed Episode 7, we all assume it would have floundered but we dont know that.

He may not be the best director (well we know he isnt) but he is a good story teller and facilitator of the impossible.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The reason why I would not have the Capital hit first is it’s A) too bold a move for the First Order still licking it wounds from the end of the Empire B) a Resistance base in First Order territory would arguably be a legitimate target as they are being attacked by them.

After Leia takes command of those loyal to her in the Republic old guard (Ackbar etc) and attacks the weapon having it destroy the capital also makes it seem legitimate self defence on the First Order’s part. Remember evil is rarely self aware. Most evil people think they are doing the right thing.

What we would be left with would be the same but by a more plausible route with Leia having more to do (a bit like Kirk in Search for Spock but on a bigger scale than pinching one ship and it’s bridge crew.

Still think she is Snoke btw which would explain why they have marginalised her role.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yoda Is Your Father said:

Bingowings said:

As for Leia’s face. Honestly the level of overlapping sexism and ageism in nerd circles is a bloody disgrace. It makes me feel ashamed to own small plastic dolls in the shape of aliens and robots it really does.

Well said.

+1, or +8, or whatever.

Honestly I think some people just can’t handle her not being late 70’s/early 80’s Leia in a bikini. And that’s sad.

One thing I appreciated about Rey, after Natalie Portman’s eight thousand costumes in the PT, was that she wore the same thing the entire movie.

Author
Time

Bosk said:

hydrospanner said:

Bosk said:

Why would anyone go to see a film wanting to hate it? A good film is a good film. Tfa is not a good film. At least lucas has commented, I think he was polite saying it’s a retro film rather than a blatant rip off!

Didn’t he say that he really liked it and it was the film that he should have made a couple of weeks ago?

I hope not…even the pt films were functional as films

You are funny, but not in a good way.

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

The reason why I would not have the Capital hit first is it’s A) too bold a move for the First Order still licking it wounds from the end of the Empire B) a Resistance base in First Order territory would arguably be a legitimate target as they are being attacked by them.

After Leia takes command of those loyal to her in the Republic old guard (Ackbar etc) and attacks the weapon having it destroy the capital also makes it seem legitimate self defence on the First Order’s part. Remember evil is rarely self aware. Most evil people think they are doing the right thing.

What we would be left with would be the same but by a more plausible route with Leia having more to do (a bit like Kirk in Search for Spock but on a bigger scale than pinching one ship and it’s bridge crew.

Still think she is Snoke btw which would explain why they have marginalised her role.

I just don’t see it, that would be quite the reveal if we find out that Leia is the one ultimately responsible for Han’s death.

Author
Time

And that Kylo is only chosing mom over dad.

Author
Time

The “emo” thing bugs me. Luke was whiny as hell, and people seem to love it.

I find Ren to be a very well fleshed out character, at least what has been revealed of him so far.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

When I say he’s “emo”, I’m joking, of course 😄
I agree he’s been fleshed out. But what’s his purpose in the movie? If he’s a villain, does he work as a villain?
Sure, Luke was a bit cocky in ANH, but his attitude didn’t affect his actions, and so his character: he’s a brave one, he does save the princess, he “does care”, we’re with him when he blows up the Death Star, he’s the hero.
Ren, on the other hand, as a villain, takes off his mask too early, and we get to know he’s just a boy. He’s constantly mocked by our heroes, he’s afraid, can’t take control of the situation and, finally, gets defeated. Is he a true villain, is he actually a threat to the heroes? 😄 If you ask me, no, and this affected the whole movie, especially its second part.

The Original Trilogy’s Timeline Reconstruction: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Implied-starting-date-of-the-Empire-from-OT-dialogue/post/786201/#TopicPost786201