logo Sign In

Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * SPOILER THREAD * — Page 216

Author
Time

pablumatic said:

I mentioned this in my review of the movie in the review thread, but this movie’s biggest sin is taking the happy ending of Return of the Jedi away. Effectively retconning it out of existence.

While I still like the movie for what it is, a Star Wars film made by fans of Star Wars, I’ll probably end up considering it along the likes of Expanded Universe tales. Old EU already ripped away the happy end to Return of the Jedi and The Force Awakens is no different in that regard. The only difference is this tale is extremely expensive and stars (or cameos) the original protagonist actors.

It’s true that we never see the happy aftermath. But, as far as we know, there were times of relative peace. The Republic seems largely demilitarized if the destruction of a few key planets was enough to weaken it so substantially, indicating that it was probably very much peacetime until these events with the First Order, Knights of Ren, etc took place.

Even though the new EU does indicate that the war was not simply ended by the destruction of the second Death Star, it did indeed serve as the important blow that led to its unraveling. At the beginning of TFA, the remnants of the Empire were not in charge of the galaxy, so I don’t see anything being undone, unless you believed the events in RoTJ would completely secure peace in the galaxy for hundreds of years, etc.

Author
Time

Based on the direction Disney is going with this after watching the film, I wouldn’t be surprised if Rey turned out to be Luke Skywalkers daughter.

Author
Time

I don’t know about that. Rey remembers and has a vision of when she was ripped from her family on Jakku followed by the ship she came from flying away. I don’t think Luke would have knowingly done this, even if his failure as a master was around the same time. I would also think there would have been recognition between the two at the end. I guess all we can do is hurry up and wait to be sure.

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.

Author
Time

pablumatic said:

Had there actually been a new threat to the galaxy, rather than just the Empire with a public relations name change and a large bucket of black paint for their spaceships, it would have worked better for me.

As it is, somehow the Rebels didn’t really win and the Empire managed to sneak off and make an even bigger Death Star.

My hope for the final two movies of this sequel trilogy is that we do finally see an end to the Empire/First Order. No jumping off point to more sequels with Stormtroopers and black robed figures with red lightsabers. At least give me that.

I understand what you’re saying, but history does repeat itself. After Alexander the Great died, his empire fell to pieces, often waring over power. In recent history, the Soviet Union fell, only to become something as powerful some twenty years later (Russia), who is, in some ways, succeeding in becoming the power it once was. In many ways, this is like the Empire falling, only to rise out of the ashes the First Order.

I can see how some folks would be upset about re-using the Death Star plot point; however, again, this mimics history. For example, modern nukes are many times more powerful than the A-bombs used during WWII. But are they not essentially the same weapon, only far more powerful (much like the Starkiller Base is in TFA)? Why wouldn’t the First Order want a weapon as powerful as that? And who is to say building such a weapon wasn’t a ploy (and a plot device in the next two films) to lure Luke from hiding?

Last, I have read folks complaining about the Galaxy “forgetting” history in TFA. This again can have roots in reality. There are societies with totalitarian regimes who recreate history on a whim (North Korea, anyone?). Is it not plausible that the First Order, with its power and influence can and would attempt to rewrite history for some (Finn) and erase it altogether for others (Rey)?

Like I said in a previous post, I DID NOT leave TPM in '99 ecstatic. I remember feeling dread and thinking how bored I was. And, although I never bashed the film, I never found much to defend about it, unlike the way I feel about TFA.

Author
Time

It’s a big galaxy torn between two superpowers, so yeah, why wouldn’t the story of “guerrilla” soldiers three decades ago be history somewhere, legend somewhere else, and just plain propaganda lies in other places.
Also if you lived on a junk planet and some old guy told you the tale of the young farm boy turned wizard-warrior who helped take down the Galactic Empire, would you have believed him? You’d probably take these stories as legends, folktales, or at the very least apocryphal re-tellings of history. Also doubt Jakku had history books. Maybe Hosnian Prime, but not Jakku.

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novel; Dawn of the Karabu.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

MJR80 said:
I understand what you’re saying, but history does repeat itself. After Alexander the Great died, his empire fell to pieces, often waring over power. In recent history, the Soviet Union fell, only to become something as powerful some twenty years later (Russia), who is, in some ways, succeeding in becoming the power it once was. In many ways, this is like the Empire falling, only to rise out of the ashes the First Order.

I can see how some folks would be upset about re-using the Death Star plot point; however, again, this mimics history. For example, modern nukes are many times more powerful than the A-bombs used during WWII. But are they not essentially the same weapon, only far more powerful (much like the Starkiller Base is in TFA)? Why wouldn’t the First Order want a weapon as powerful as that? And who is to say building such a weapon wasn’t a ploy (and a plot device in the next two films) to lure Luke from hiding?

Last, I have read folks complaining about the Galaxy “forgetting” history in TFA. This again can have roots in reality. There are societies with totalitarian regimes who recreate history on a whim (North Korea, anyone?). Is it not plausible that the First Order, with its power and influence can and would attempt to rewrite history for some (Finn) and erase it altogether for others (Rey)?

This is exactly why the film works so well for me (aside from Rey and Han). Those of us in our 50s are well aware that one wartime defeat, no matter the size, often changes things only temporarily.

As you’ve pointed out with several excellent examples, some of which I’ve lived through, the wiped-clean happy ending of Return very much mirrors reality. I suspect a great many of the fans complaining that the erased happy Ewok dancing are twenty-somethings who have yet to experienced the reality of the world’s differing philosophical beliefs or the lengths those nations and leaders are willing to go to to try and force them on the rest of the planet. That very much includes their censoring the outside world and history from their people. That behavior is going on daily. Not even remotely a stretch to show it happening in The Force Awakens.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

pablumatic said:

Had there actually been a new threat to the galaxy, rather than just the Empire with a public relations name change and a large bucket of black paint for their spaceships, it would have worked better for me.

Had there actually been a new threat to the civilized world rather than just the Taliban with a public relations name change and a large bucket of black paint for their flags…

As it is, somehow the Rebels didn’t really win and the Empire managed to sneak off and make an even bigger Death Star.

We captured and tried the group behind the original attempt to bring down the World Trade Center in 1993. As it is, somehow the US didn’t really win and the terrorists managed to sneak off and come up with an even bigger plan.

Edit
My point with quoting and responding in this manner isn’t to be dickish. It’s to show that those points could easily be applied to the real world.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

Anchorhead said:
I suspect a great many of the fans complaining that the erased happy Ewok dancing are twenty-somethings who have yet to experienced the reality of the world’s differing philosophical beliefs or the lengths those nations and leaders are willing to go to to try and force them on the rest of the planet. That very much includes their censoring the outside world and history from their people. That’s going on daily. Not even remotely a stretch to show it happening in The Force Awakens.

Hm, I was honestly thinking people around 40 years old and above would feel that way. Not ALL of course, but I was thinking those that grew up with the theatrical releases don’t want the few precious moments of their childhood ‘denied’ because of new films saying happy ending for their favorite actors didn’t happen.

I was 10 years old when Revenge of the Sith came out, so when Star Wars ‘ended’, it ended on a rather sad note, but I never felt betrayed by it. I already had some memories of 9/11, and since then, haven’t ever found ‘happy endings’ realistic. This is why I greatly welcome the world of TFA too.

Again, I’m just telling my experience as a 20 year old. I don’t necessarily think its the people that are unaware of worldly things, but rather, a crowd of older people wanting to believe Star Wars from their childhood will always have a fairy tale ending. It’s the few good thing that they can cling onto, but now, maybe they worry and afraid to know this isn’t true anymore.

The Rise of Failures

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TavorX said:
I was thinking those that grew up with the theatrical releases don’t want the few precious moments of their childhood…a crowd of older people wanting to believe Star Wars from their childhood will always have a fairy tale ending. It’s the few good thing that they can cling onto…

Well kid, as condescending as you come across, I can assure you that older people don’t have a few precious moments that they can cling onto.

From the board reviews I’ve read (here and another), the criticisms of the erased 1980s appear to be coming from the fans who do not yet understand the journey.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Random rant:

This movie makes me so happy. I must say I honestly love how much of a phenomenon it is. Almost everyone I know has seen it. Christmas parties were actually fun this year because I had something exciting to talk about! The crazy thing to is, I have yet to meet someone who isn’t head over heels in love with it. Like, whenever someone asks me what I feel about it, I’m a little hesitant to come right out with my love for it because I don’t want people to think I’m hyperbolizing, but then I find they loved it as much as me. Honestly, the only people I’ve heard dislike it are people on the internet (this site specifically). Every single person I know in real life who has seen it has loved it. It’s crazy, but t’s true, and somehow it makes me so happy (I had a two hour phone call with an old friend about the movie last week). Star Wars is bringing people together. That’s exactly what it does best.

Author
Time

Anchorhead said:
My point with quoting and responding in this manner isn’t to be dickish. It’s to show that those points could easily be applied to the real world.

If we’re talking about how threats appear in Star Wars, I remember George Lucas saying there were parallels between U.S. foreign policy in Vietnam and Iraq when compared to the rise of and actions of the Empire. With a not-so-covert statement on it all in Revenge of the Sith. Rag-tag groups of terrorists/freedom fighters/insurgents weren’t the idea behind it.

Abrams has gone on to say the First Order are basically Nazis somehow rising out of their hideouts in Argentina. It didn’t happen in the real world and its equally implausible in the Star Wars universe.

If there’s a new trilogy after this one, I want a new threat. One that doesn’t diminish previous movies.

Author
Time

If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story.

Orson Welles

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

According to this guy from Lucasfilm TFA was at some point in the production known as “Shadow of the Empire.”
(I guess Abrams and Kasdan never heard of “ShadowS of the Empire.”)
http://www.starwarsnewsnet.com/2015/12/pablo-hidalgo-reveals-the-original-title-of-star-wars-the-force-awakens.html

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novel; Dawn of the Karabu.

Author
Time

Yea, that guy from Lucasfilm (Pablo Hidalgo) is tasked with making sure none of the ‘new canon’ contradicts now that they have shaved away the E.U.

I like what Lawrence Kasdan said a few weeks ago though about this topic, basically he didn’t understand canon from non-canon. I do and don’t care. I just want the story to evolve however is most interesting for the characters.

“This will begin to make things right.” Lor San Tekka

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Maybe not the best analogy, but other cruel regimes copy their methods to this day. How is it implausible chunks of the Empire survived long enough to rebuild? It was a good enough idea for the EU…

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Imperial_Remnant

That was actually one of my favorite parts of the film. I loved that the Empire was still around in a similar form. The Nationalist government of China that the Communist Party overthrew remained intact for decades with a government set up in Taiwan. I like that the Emperor’s death in Jedi didn’t end the Empire, I mean heck, Caesar’s assassination didn’t end Rome.

The Person in Question

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, it’s not the overly optimistic ending of Jedi where evil is destroyed forever, but honestly some of us don’t like that about Jedi. You can never really get rid of evil. Max talks about it in the film. First the Sith, then the Empire, now the First Order. Evil will always be out there (as it is in the real world), but we can’t just run away. We must face them.

There is a strangeness to it, when you take it as a sequel to Jedi. The problem is, of course, that there was 30 years in between. Typically this would not be the story that would follow the story in Jedi. Jedi sets up the destruction of the Empire, the rise of the new, good power (Rebellion/Republic), and that Luke will be passing on what he has learned. That’s what someone would reasonable expect in a ROTJ follow up. And it’s not like those things didn’t happen - they did, just off screen. It feels like, to me anyway, that there’s a whole other trilogy that happened before TFA and after ROTJ (detailing the beginning of the New Republic and New Jedi Academy and all the way through the rise of the First Order/Resistance and Ben’s turn to the dark side and Jedi Purge). I suppose it’s similar to the OT - there it feels like there could’ve have been a whole trilogy that came before. Now obviously they made that trilogy as the PT but here in TFA we don’t get that in-between so the surprises and mystery of the backstory is restored much like in the OT. In that way, TFA and the ST truly feels like a new Star Wars trilogy for a new generation (unlike the PT which… well you know).

Anyway it’s a story I’m eager to read (whenever they decide it’s okay to make books/comics in that era - unfortunately probably post-EpIX).

Author
Time

You could argue that the ending of ROTJ is more of an emotional book-end to the trilogy, giving off a sense of victory and conclusion, while lore-wise and logically it’s never actually implied that they won the entire war. Movies aren’t about politics, they’re about people and their personal conflicts, and all of these conflicts (e.g. the important one to most viewers) are solved by the end of ROTJ. Luke redeems Vader, Luke finishes his “spiritual” journey, Leia ends up with Han, etc. etc. All we actually see is roughly 20 Rebel pilots celebrating with a bunch of Ewoks. Ok, sure, the SE has the galaxy celebrate victory and freedom, but I don’t think I have to sell the argument that that’s a retcon to anyone here.
However, if you stop and think about what’s going on in the lore, as most people won’t bother to do, then you realize that the end of ROTJ may have been a huge victory, but the galaxy is still filled with the Imperial army and the Rebel Alliance is still a pretty small military force. What ROTJ’s ending sets up lore-wise could easily evolve into the two scenarios we now have; the TFA/Disney one and the old EU one.

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novel; Dawn of the Karabu.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

emanswfan said:

Listening to the soundtrack last night, thanks Amazon.

Definitely better than John William’s PT scores and right up there with the originals. The score has such a freshness and familiarity at the same time

I couldn’t agree less. This for me was the weakest Star Wars score. Even the crappiest prequel moments had memorable themes. The only motifs that I recognised were from the OT.

Author
Time

So who is this Smoke then? Someone new or a mask concealing someone very old?

Author
Time

Not sure if this has been brought up, but has anyone else noticed that an extra bed has been added to the Falcon in the main hold?

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, seems like the TFA Blu-ray/DVD will be released April 5, 2016.
Abrams have also said that a good portion of the deleted scenes will be made available.

http://www.starwarsnewsnet.com/2015/12/star-wars-the-force-awakens-blu-ray-aiming-at-april-5-2016-release-date.html

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novel; Dawn of the Karabu.

Author
Time

ZkinandBonez said:

Well, seems like the TFA Blu-ray/DVD will be released April 5, 2016.
Abrams have also said that a good portion of the deleted scenes will be made available.

http://www.starwarsnewsnet.com/2015/12/star-wars-the-force-awakens-blu-ray-aiming-at-april-5-2016-release-date.html

I hope that bit from the novelization where Leia sends an envoy to the senate on Hosnian Prime is in there. I think that one scene would clear up a lot of the vagueness about the state of the galaxy that a lot of folks have problems with.

Author
Time

joefavs said:

ZkinandBonez said:

Well, seems like the TFA Blu-ray/DVD will be released April 5, 2016.
Abrams have also said that a good portion of the deleted scenes will be made available.

http://www.starwarsnewsnet.com/2015/12/star-wars-the-force-awakens-blu-ray-aiming-at-april-5-2016-release-date.html

I hope that bit from the novelization where Leia sends an envoy to the senate on Hosnian Prime is in there. I think that one scene would clear up a lot of the vagueness about the state of the galaxy that a lot of folks have problems with.

Maybe, but it seems unlikely that they even filmed it considering that it happened before Leia’s first appearance on Takodona. It seem unlikely to me that they ever considered putting it into the film, but it’s not impossible.
We do however know from the BTS footage that was shown on the Disney channel that they did film an Unkar Plutt scene on Takodona, so I think that’s very likely to appear. Unless of course Disney find it too violent, which is probably why it was cut in the first place.

Star Wars is Surrealism, not Science Fiction (essay)
Original Trilogy Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Beyond the OT Documentaries/Making-Ofs (YouTube, Vimeo, etc. finds)
Amazon link to my novel; Dawn of the Karabu.