logo Sign In

Return of the Jedi - Why so much hate? What do you guys think of it? — Page 3

Author
Time

The was no need to make Leia the sister of Luke even in the “lets get it finished fast” mood that Lucas was in at that point in his life.
Yoda could have been referring to Anakin as the ‘other’ hope.
Ben could be all negative about Vader and how he is beyond redemption and needs to be destroyed for the greater good and Yoda could be all wise and remind Luke there is always hope.
On his death bed Yoda reminds Luke of his earlier lesson about the nature of the light and dark sides. All that was needed was to have him reflect on how it might not necessarily be curtains for Anakin, that he might have been wrong and Luke might be onto something about redeeming his Father.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I dislike Leia being Luke’s sister too as it feels as a forced retcon, but they had no choice but do something about it. Had Yoda just said “We need to find another one”, no problem, but he didn’t, so they HAD to explain who was the “other” he was talking about.
Anakin? Not sure it would’ve worked, as Yoda refers to him as an “agent of evil” in TESB, but with the right dialogues, they could’ve made it believable maybe (hell, they “kind of” explained why Ben lied, after all!)
If they didn’t have so many characters at that point, they could’ve introduced her in ROTJ as a new character working for the rebellion, so to make her take part to the DSII attack. I’m not sure it would’ve been better, but from a marketing standpoint, this could’ve also been the basis for new films or telefilms.

The Original Trilogy’s Timeline Reconstruction: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Implied-starting-date-of-the-Empire-from-OT-dialogue/post/786201/#TopicPost786201

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

The was no need to make Leia the sister of Luke even in the “lets get it finished fast” mood that Lucas was in at that point in his life.
Yoda could have been referring to Anakin as the ‘other’ hope.
Ben could be all negative about Vader and how he is beyond redemption and needs to be destroyed for the greater good and Yoda could be all wise and remind Luke there is always hope.
On his death bed Yoda reminds Luke of his earlier lesson about the nature of the light and dark sides. All that was needed was to have him reflect on how it might not necessarily be curtains for Anakin, that he might have been wrong and Luke might be onto something about redeeming his Father.

Well as I said many times already, I think Obi-Wan and Yoda never realistically considered Luke being able to defeat the Emperor. I mean if they did then they would not surely not wait to start his training at age of 20. To me, their plan seemed to be to use Luke merely as a tool to trigger Anakin’s return who would then destroy the Emperor.

真実

Author
Time

Wasn’t it the plan when they wrote the “there is another” bit that the third film wouldn’t be the end, and that the fourth would be about Luke searching for his sister, but that by the time ROTJ was underway Lucas just wanted to tie everything up because he was sick of Star Wars? That doesn’t change the fact that it’s clunky writing and it doesn’t work terribly well, but I was always under the impression that it was born of real-world pressures.

Author
Time

For me, the real problem with Jedi is that, story wise, it only does two things: tie up loose ends in a not so flattering fashion and finish Luke’s story. Everything else is explosions and chases.

The pacing is also weak. The first third of the film is spent saving Han and it’s basically a mini-film in itself that has zero impact over the rest of the story (except to put Han back in the picture). Then it’s a re-tread of 1977 with the rebellion having to face an even bigger Death Star they have to blow up except it’s padded with exposition to explain question after question that Empire had so beautifully set up. And the answers are just kind of…meh. Leia being Luke’s sister is the most egregious. Leia could have been the other one, but did they have to be siblings? I also ponder if making Anakin and Darth Vader the same person was the best solution. Also: perhaps Luke should be pissed at Obi Wan for not telling him the truth about his father and it could have been fuel for his flirt to the dark side (but no, we get a fireside chat instead…)

That said, it does have its positive sides (Luke vs the Emperor and the Death Star final battle) so overall it’s a decent product and a fun film to watch. It just could have done so much more and didn’t.

What’s the internal temperature of a TaunTaun? Luke warm.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Mavimao said:

For me, the real problem with Jedi is that, story wise, it only does two things: tie up loose ends in a not so flattering fashion and finish Luke’s story.

That’s a plus and a minus to me. I still enjoy the film, but I can feel how threadbare and problematic it is. As such, I’m glad it uses whatever gusto it still can muster to wrap up the story of Star Wars. In many ways, it was very gutsy for Lucas to say farewell to the Star Wars galaxy with Jedi, and then just pack it up and go home. After the runaway success of the Star Wars films (even Jedi), he’d certainly have been tempted to make more films, even after the inspiration and care behind these films had been thoroughly burnt out. I hate to think about what might have been.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

Dragging the story for more than ROTJ would have certainly ruined the saga. I think trilogy was the right way to go.

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

If Gary Kurtz was in charge Jedi would have been even better than Empire.

I agree with the twincest problem of Luke and Leia, but still love the film anyways. If they stopped here, or never made the Prequels and TFA was the fourth film in the franchise, things aren’t that bad.

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

Bingowings said:

The was no need to make Leia the sister of Luke even in the “lets get it finished fast” mood that Lucas was in at that point in his life.
Yoda could have been referring to Anakin as the ‘other’ hope.
Ben could be all negative about Vader and how he is beyond redemption and needs to be destroyed for the greater good and Yoda could be all wise and remind Luke there is always hope.
On his death bed Yoda reminds Luke of his earlier lesson about the nature of the light and dark sides. All that was needed was to have him reflect on how it might not necessarily be curtains for Anakin, that he might have been wrong and Luke might be onto something about redeeming his Father.

Well as I said many times already, I think Obi-Wan and Yoda never realistically considered Luke being able to defeat the Emperor. I mean if they did then they would not surely not wait to start his training at age of 20. To me, their plan seemed to be to use Luke merely as a tool to trigger Anakin’s return who would then destroy the Emperor.

At last we actually agree on something 😄

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

The Sandpeople are depicted as physical beings with interesting details in their costumes that speak of a culture beyond what is said.
The Ewoks and Gungans could have filled a similar role but they look increasingly less physical and are played for laughs.


Doesn’t this fella look physical enough? ; )

CatBus said:

Actually, I forgot to mention one of the biggest gripes story-wise with ROTJ, because at this point it’s so ingrained: Leia is Luke’s sister. I mean, Jesus, really? Vader being Luke’s father worked, sure, and it blew everyone’s mind. But Leia is his sister?!? All this does is add soap opera dynamic with no payoff. I remember at the time, people saw it and started joking that Han was Luke’s brother, and Chewie was his dog, etc. It became the subject of parody–the entire Star Wars galaxy was shrinking down to one family. I mean nobody went completely bonkers and claimed Darth and Greedo were childhood friends or that Darth made C-3PO in his basement, but it was still widely ridiculed. And I feel it was a fair criticism.

Well said. It was indeed the subject of parody at the time. Making Leia his twin sister was basically when Star Wars jumped the shark in a script and movie full of what a fuck were they thinking moments. Phantom Menace just turned out to be an extension of all that. It’s also technically inept in many departments where we had come to expect high production values from the previous ones.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Again, this is why Gary Kurtz was purged from Star Wars so that we can never have a perfect trilogy and have thirty-five years and counting of unrelenting misery. I now envy every person who disliked Star Wars back in 1977; they were the lucky ones. Even hardcore Star Wars fans hate 99.9% of things associated with the franchise, and it’s all thanks to Jedi. This is probably the worst tragedy of the late 20th century.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Not all the Ewoks were cute and cuddly looking.

I always thought this fine fuzzy fellow looked more than capable of eating your face off, and making a necklace out of your toes. 😉

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Ewoks are a pretty good representation of the “little guy,” in a number of ways. I don’t mind the idea behind them, but I do wish the film did a better job proving they could actually take on “an entire legion of [the Emperor’s] best troops,” or at least showed that they got some help from the better trained alliance troops.

Somehow, I still like these conversations. Though it seems like they’ve been hashed out ad nauseaum, every once in a while you’ll realize something new. Like, I’ve known for awhile that the recruitment of the Ewoks harkens back to the first draft of Star Wars with the Wookiee army. But what I didn’t think of until now is that, in that early draft, the Wookiees are trained to fight and defend themselves using the more advanced Rebel technology ala Seven Samurai. Where was that in ROTJ? Could have been another way to make their victory more believable.

Author
Time

DominicCobb said:

Ewoks are a pretty good representation of the “little guy,” in a number of ways. I don’t mind the idea behind them, but I do wish the film did a better job proving they could actually take on “an entire legion of [the Emperor’s] best troops,” or at least showed that they got some help from the better trained alliance troops.

My thoughts, too, basically.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The Ewoks are an early example of the awkward racial profiling by proxy we would get in the prequels.
George’s main talent is evoking nostalgia.
When his early successful films came out cinema was rather bleak and forward looking to a post nuclear wilderness run by apes and/or mutants the only surviving humans were on the moon which was escaping the solar system at super-luminal speed. All authority figures were as corrupt as Nixon and all children were possessed by or born of the Devil.
A film like THX-1138 fits into that sort of world with ease, maybe too much ease so he then made his first hit which practically invented the 50s nostalgia wave of the 70s, and the Star Wars and Raiders with their nods to cinema from happier more deluded times.
The problem being that those serials he was trying to evoke depicted some pretty awful racial stereotypes. The cowardly ‘Jap’, the noble savage, the money obsessed hooked nose Jew, the lazy black, the cannibal native.
The Tusken may fill the role of the Native American in a Western but he has the virtue of not having any of the physical tropes (no feathers, no war paint, no war song, no throwing axes, he gets a wigwam in the prequels but more of that later) so they work.
The Ewoks are beginning to be a bit too close to the hero eating natives of Tarzan to be comfortable. There is a serious debate going on now about the problems perceived by Slave Girl Leia and fat sultan Jabba but the Ewoks are more of a indicator of things to come for me than that.
In the PT we have the robot loving sneak attack slit-eyed Trade Federation, the money obsessed hooked nosed trader and Stepin Fetchit.
I don’t think George is trying to be offensive, his friends and family would hopefully not hang around such a man who would but I think he just doesn’t think like other people do and he increasingly distanced himself from people who might have steered him into more sophisticated ways of doing what he wanted. My main bag with the Ewoks is they are not seen as culture that could take down Imperial troops before the battle. Their look would be fine if it truly was subverted by showing the Imperials already being their victims.
That way the overnight traps make sense. The time for trophy helmets would be before the battle not after it. That way Han’s dismissal of them as cute Teddy Bears gets inverted, if we get a taste of foreknowledge that they could handle themselves and reclaim their forest without the outsiders help but not with the ticking bomb of the metal moon that needs to be destroyed. The Bolas gag gets used in both ROTJ and TPM which marks it out as the precursor of awfulness to come.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

Again, this is why Gary Kurtz was purged from Star Wars so that we can never have a perfect trilogy and have thirty-five years and counting of unrelenting misery.

According to the relevant information available, Kurtz was fired already during ESB because he didn’t manage to do his job as a producer. He let principal photography to go way over schedule and way over budget (something that is unacceptable for a big studio production, let alone self-financed production). Even if he stayed things wouldn’t be much different. Lucas always had it his way. Even in ANH since studio didn’t seem to care.

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DuracellEnergizer said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

Maybe I should make an Empire Strikes Back thread. People aren’t in debate about that film.

Well, Anchorhead is something of a '77 purist …

In spite of the new film looking like a proper restoration of the story I’ve been waiting on for over 30 years, I’m aware that I may be in for another disappointment. We’ll see next month.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Bingowings said:

The Ewoks are an early example of the awkward racial profiling by proxy we would get in the prequels.
George’s main talent is evoking nostalgia.

The problem being that those serials he was trying to evoke depicted some pretty awful racial stereotypes. The cowardly ‘Jap’, the noble savage, the money obsessed hooked nose Jew, the lazy black, the cannibal native.
The Tusken may fill the role of the Native American in a Western but he has the virtue of not having any of the physical tropes (no feathers, no war paint, no war song, no throwing axes, he gets a wigwam in the prequels but more of that later) so they work.
The Ewoks are beginning to be a bit too close to the hero eating natives of Tarzan to be comfortable. There is a serious debate going on now about the problems perceived by Slave Girl Leia and fat sultan Jabba but the Ewoks are more of a indicator of things to come for me than that.
In the PT we have the robot loving sneak attack slit-eyed Trade Federation, the money obsessed hooked nosed trader and Stepin Fetchit.
I don’t think George is trying to be offensive, his friends and family would hopefully not hang around such a man who would but I think he just doesn’t think like other people do and he increasingly distanced himself from people who might have steered him into more sophisticated ways of doing what he wanted.

I’ve always found it strange that more isn’t made about his offensive hardly-veiled racial stereotypes. I don’t know about his last two films, but Phantom is loaded with them. At times, it borders on SNL parody. Not in a funny way. JarJar is just plain insulting. He’s also a great indicator of just how out of touch Lucas really is.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

imperialscum said:

generalfrevious said:

Again, this is why Gary Kurtz was purged from Star Wars so that we can never have a perfect trilogy and have thirty-five years and counting of unrelenting misery.

According to the relevant information available, Kurtz was fired already during ESB because he didn’t manage to do his job as a producer. He let principal photography to go way over schedule and way over budget (something that is unacceptable for a big studio production, let alone self-financed production). Even if he stayed things wouldn’t be much different. Lucas always had it his way. Even in ANH since studio didn’t seem to care.

Convenient excuse; Lucas was jealous that Kurtz made a better film than he ever could. Empire is the best because Lucas has almost zero involvement, and conversely Jedi is the weakest. The Ewoks and twincest were all George’s idea.

Author
Time

generalfrevious said:

imperialscum said:

generalfrevious said:

Again, this is why Gary Kurtz was purged from Star Wars so that we can never have a perfect trilogy and have thirty-five years and counting of unrelenting misery.

According to the relevant information available, Kurtz was fired already during ESB because he didn’t manage to do his job as a producer. He let principal photography to go way over schedule and way over budget (something that is unacceptable for a big studio production, let alone self-financed production). Even if he stayed things wouldn’t be much different. Lucas always had it his way. Even in ANH since studio didn’t seem to care.

Convenient excuse; Lucas was jealous that Kurtz made a better film than he ever could. Empire is the best because Lucas has almost zero involvement, and conversely Jedi is the weakest. The Ewoks and twincest were all George’s idea.

You can easily find the information about ESB principal photography time and budget increase in several sources. Also you may not be aware, but Kurtz was effectively replaced already during the ESB principal photography (far from the final product) so your “jealousy” theory is rather silly.

Zero involvement? The only part he wasn’t involved was the principal photography, which was Kershner’s domain (the main reason he was hired for obviously).

真実

Author
Time

I know it’s pointless to argue with frevious, but the films were better for more reasons than just Kurtz. Empire’s extraordinary is in large part because of Kershner. Kurtz should be thanked more for letting him do what he wanted.

On Jedi, Lucas wanted more control and that was what he was going to get. Kurtz left because of that, amongst other reasons. There were other producers who could have kept Lucas in check as Kurtz did but that’s not what Lucas wanted so that’s not what he got.

Lucas certainly has a resentment towards Empire but I’m not sure it’s jealousy as much as it is lingering frustration from shooting over time and budget. Lucas has been quoted as saying the film was better than it needed to be, or should have been. He would have been happier with a worse film if only because it would have caused him less stress.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DominicCobb said:

Kurtz should be thanked more for letting him do what he wanted.

Exactly. In a way Kurtz saved the film at expense of being fired. If he forced Kershner to work according to the normal schedule the filmed scenes and acting would probably be worse. Whether Kershner’s directing was slow/inefficient can be debatable. It might have been, considering that practically all other films he worked on are rather bad.

真実