DominicCobb said:
You know nothing, John Doom.
DominicCobb said:
John Doom said:
Thank you, I always appreciate this kind of loosy replies. I wonder if you actually read what I wrote. What do YOU know, then? Tell me, tell me :D
I know that I was making a (pretty solid) Game of Thrones joke, mostly in response to the fact that you referred to the chrome trooper as a he, when she is played by Gwendoline Christie (an actress on Game of Thrones).
This I know, I used a generic "he" on purpose for Captain Asthma Coffeepot (I thought we were writing in the "non spoiler thread"...?)
DominicCobb said:
Also ur opinions r dum.
More seriously though the teal and orange tint that fans are bemoaning is barely even there and it's really just silly to judge a movie based on its trailer. If you don't want to see it, don't.
That's right: if I don't want to see it, I won't (but I will, anyway :D). Are you even reading? I was asked about my opinion and I said it. It's ok if you disagree with my statements, I'm not trying to force anybody to agree with me.
DominicCobb said:
[...] If you don't like the trailer fine, but trailer quality =/= film quality. The trailer got me more excited and that's all. I'm was looking forward to the movie and hoping it would be good before I saw the trailer. Still do.
Trailers are supposed to be done to let people know about a movie, what to expect from it, but as I said, I know they may not always represent the final product. I disliked what I saw so far, that's all but, who knows, maybe the movie will be good, maybe not, maybe they'll change it, I don't know (do you?).
I'm glad you're looking forward to the movie. I got my own opinion, just like you have one.
DominicCobb said:
A trailer should not be the basis for you judging whether a film's cinematography is professional or not. Well, it should I guess. The cinematography looks (very obviously) very professional. But if you were making this on your fcking iPhone it would look extremely unprofessional and completely different, despite what you may think.
As I said, it's just that single shot and the way color and contrast is used that I think (just my opinion) most of the people on this forum can also do on their own, maybe better. I'm not talking about the equipment: there are lots of indie movie done with cheap equipments which can look professional (say, "The Evil Dead") and yet many top-budget productions which look bland and/or unprofessional.
13las said:
This is why Hollywood can't take risks any more. Every movie is analyzed to death before it comes out ("it'll suck if X character is in it" or "X thing will happen so it's going to be the best movie ever!"). With the cost of producing a blockbuster movie, would you blame them from pandering as much as possible to the fans? This film will be guilty of it, to be sure. But pre-judging it on those merits is perpetuating the problem, if you as me.
Some 'fans' are stupid, why set up such specific criteria for a film before it is even released? It doesn't make sense to me, that's why I've chosen to avoid spoilers and trailers going forward for the Force Awakens. Because I love Star Wars and want to experience a Star Wars movie as a theatrical experience (was born after the OT was released). I may not end up enjoying the movie, but I'll be glad to give it a chance.
It's really sad that some people can't do something as simple as that.
Cheer up, people just want to discuss about something they love, that's exactly what Disney expect us to do right now. It's an opportunity for everyone, after all. Don't worry: every fan will give the movie a chance one way or another, me too, even if by now I have mixed opinions.
P.S.: If Hollywood need to rob a bank to make a movie, it's their fault: people I know ask for good stories, not bigger budgets, as far as I know.