logo Sign In

Anakin's official history

Author
Time
 (Edited)

It's only speculation and hypothesis, but with new films coming soon, specially the standalone films that could fit within the timeframe of the OT, I think there are some things that could (or should) be approached, and would be nice to discuss or speculate, at least, between us the fans.

I named the thread official history, because I believe there are many plot holes regarding what the galaxy knows and supposes about the events between ROTS and ROTJ; some of them, as Vader "betraying" the Emperor have been recently brought up in reddit, but there are others that could as well be used as significant plot devices:

a) How much does the galaxy know about Jedi General Anakin Skywalker, (who in old cannon was wide known as "the hero with no fear")? Is his reputation wide known?

b) Why is Vader so secretive about his identity considering that, had Mustafar never happened, his identity would have been public? Which leads us to

c) What is all that stuff about Vader's double personality, and referring to himself in third person? Vader IS Anakin Skywalker, and he knows it in the films, he says "I am your father". When he denies being Anakin in ROTJ, it could well be a metaphor of his election of the Dark Side to Luke.

d) If Anakin Skywalker, widely known as a war figure across the galaxy officially "died" in Coruscant, how comes he is no martyr to the rebellion, or never gets even mentioned, except as a "great pilot"?

e) If the Rebels held Anakin's figure as a martyr, how would that impact on Vader?

f)If Vader's identity was known, how would that impact on Luke between the rebels

g) How comes no one outside the rebellion recognizes/associates Luke Skywalker with the other "mythical" Skywalker that freed planets in the clone wars.

h) If this happened, how would that impact on Vader?

i) Would anyone who knew Darth Vader's identity inside the Rebelion (read Ahsoka or ObiWan if at some point he joins for some mission in the new cannon) keep it a secret, if Anakin's figure was to be held in high regard for morale of the troops?

Again, the whole double identity of Anakin Skywalker/Vader wasn't in the original plans of the emperor. From what is seen in the PT, you can tell that there is never such a pronounced double identity in Dooku/Tyrannus or Sidious/Palpatine; and even if it is the suit what allows it, Skywalker/Vader is something that could really not have happened.

Then why is Anakin so secretive about it? It seems way too convenient for the plot.

Author
Time

There could have been propaganda value in the "lone loyal Jedi", who died saving Palpatine from the evil Mace Windu and the other traitors? That would make Anakin's legacy of dubious value to the Rebellion.

Maybe Vader develops a sort of split personality to cope with the guilt of the terrible things he's done? In the Star Wars novel he actually ruminates on the destruction of Alderaan, almost as if he regrets it, before reminding himself it was a planet of traitors too.

Lucas is supposed to have talked to psychologists in developing the OT, so that may have figured into Vader's mindset and motivations.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Vader in the OT never references Anakin in any direct way.  He only references him in the ESB SE during the new Palpatine segment

He only says "That name no longer has any meaning for me".  That part of himself is gone, or so he thought.  But that's not really referring to himself in 3rd person.

The Rebels Season 2 premiere has him referring to Anakin in the 3rd person.  I think that's the first time we hear Vader refer to him as a separate person.  I'd say that's a rare error on Filoni's end.

As for the republic knowing about Anakin, that character basically disappeared after Order 66.  It's doubtful most people of the galaxy put Vader and Anakin together as the same person.

As for Luke Skywalker, maybe it's a common name or not a rare name in the galaxy.  Or the people on Tatooine like Wormie and Fixer just don't care.  When ANH was written, Luke's father was simply a great pilot and jedi so his son living on some backwater planet is not that far fetched.

Author
Time

And a Jedi knight having a son doesn't seem all that unusual in the OT. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

The answer is almost always, "Because George Lucas was working without a story bible and was not very good at fitting things together on the fly."  Other then that, there have been numerous cringe-worthy retcons over the years that explain all of this.  Now that those retcons have been relegated to legend status, feel free to just make up a theory.  No matter how crazy it seems, it won't be less believable than what they are sure to inevitably come up with.  

Author
Time

ratpack1961 said:

Vader in the OT never references Anakin in any direct way.  He only references him in the ESB SE during the new Palpatine segment

He only says "That name no longer has any meaning for me".  That part of himself is gone, or so he thought.  But that's not really referring to himself in 3rd person.

The Rebels Season 2 premiere has him referring to Anakin in the 3rd person.  I think that's the first time we hear Vader refer to him as a separate person.  I'd say that's a rare error on Filoni's end.

As for the republic knowing about Anakin, that character basically disappeared after Order 66.  It's doubtful most people of the galaxy put Vader and Anakin together as the same person.

As for Luke Skywalker, maybe it's a common name or not a rare name in the galaxy.  Or the people on Tatooine like Wormie and Fixer just don't care.  When ANH was written, Luke's father was simply a great pilot and jedi so his son living on some backwater planet is not that far fetched.

I had the same kind of idea. Like 'Skywalker' is the star wars equivalent of 'Smith' or 'Jones'. Same with Kenobi, which would sort of go some-way towards explaining the whole 'Ben Kenobi/Obi-Wan Kenobi' thing that people rag on.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

This makes me wonder... how many people/aliens/intelligent life with names are there in a galaxy?

Author
Time

Maybe the rumored Obi Wan film will shed light on where he got Ben from.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

:D My 2 cents:

a) How much does the galaxy know about Jedi General Anakin Skywalker, (who in old cannon was wide known as "the hero with no fear")? Is his reputation wide known?

Nothing, I think, except for veterans (like some of the rebels). When a new order is established, it passes its own "damnation memoriae", erasing every reference of the traitors (i.e.: the Jedi) of the new regime.

b) Why is Vader so secretive about his identity considering that, had Mustafar never happened, his identity would have been public? Which leads us to

c) What is all that stuff about Vader's double personality, and referring to himself in third person? Vader IS Anakin Skywalker, and he knows it in the films, he says "I am your father". When he denies being Anakin in ROTJ, it could well be a metaphor of his election of the Dark Side to Luke.

He's not secretive, he probably just disown his own republican past and assumed his imperial fighting name.

I agree that it's a metaphor: throughout the movie, there's a distinction between Vader (the dark side) and Anakin (the good/light side) of "Mr.Skywalker".

d) If Anakin Skywalker, widely known as a war figure across the galaxy officially "died" in Coruscant, how comes he is no martyr to the rebellion, or never gets even mentioned, except as a "great pilot"?

Maybe he is considered as a martyr, who knows? We've seen just 6 hours of lore :D

Or, he "died" as a jedi knight in the clone wars, unknown by most people. Maybe he wasn't even considered as a Jedi, maybe the era of the Jedi was already ending.

e) If the Rebels held Anakin's figure as a martyr, how would that impact on Vader?

I guess it would put him to shame to be known as a hero to his enemy.

f)If Vader's identity was known, how would that impact on Luke between the rebels

They would reject his legacy, I guess. The imperial propaganda would use his name to justify their oppression.

g) How comes no one outside the rebellion recognizes/associates Luke Skywalker with the other "mythical" Skywalker that freed planets in the clone wars.

Again, either Anakin wasn't known outside of some people, or Skywalker is a relatively common surname.

h) If this happened, how would that impact on Vader?

We kind of already know this: it's his son, after all, "something" he may use to take over the emperor.

i) Would anyone who knew Darth Vader's identity inside the Rebelion (read Ahsoka or ObiWan if at some point he joins for some mission in the new cannon) keep it a secret, if Anakin's figure was to be held in high regard for morale of the troops?

Definitely. I know Anakin and Vader were two different men in ANH, but that's basically what Obi-wan did with Luke.

The Original Trilogy’s Timeline Reconstruction: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Implied-starting-date-of-the-Empire-from-OT-dialogue/post/786201/#TopicPost786201

Author
Time

unamochilla2 said:

This makes me wonder... how many people/aliens/intelligent life with names are there in a galaxy?

Depends on the size of the galaxy and how many life-supporting planets/non-planetary environments there are in the galaxy. =P 

Author
Time

And how many people/aliens/intelligent lifeforms there are in the galaxy. :P

Author
Time

ratpack1961 said:

As for Luke Skywalker, maybe it's a common name or not a rare name in the galaxy.  Or the people on Tatooine like Wormie and Fixer just don't care.

 Isn't Wormie Luke's nickname?
And how do ya think he got that nickname?
Does he often eat bad foods that give him worms?
Something to do with sandwordms? (I hate those things, huhhuh.)
Is it ever mentioned anywhere?
Can I ask some more questions?

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:

ratpack1961 said:

As for Luke Skywalker, maybe it's a common name or not a rare name in the galaxy.  Or the people on Tatooine like Wormie and Fixer just don't care.

 Isn't Wormie Luke's nickname?
And how do ya think he got that nickname?
Does he often eat bad foods that give him worms?
Something to do with sandwordms? (I hate those things, huhhuh.)
Is it ever mentioned anywhere?
Can I ask some more questions?

 Yep, your right! Wormie was Luke.  I should have said Fixer and Windy (the girl).

I think we definitely need a Wormie explanation.  Lucas needs to start using twitter so we can bug him with this kind of thing.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Obviously what happened was Lucas wasn't really sure what the deal was. Probably the main reason he deleted the mention of red leader referring to Luke's father in the SE because he didn't know what he would do with the Anakin in the PT. If you go by the old EU things are certainly complicated. Been reading a bit and apparently Anakin and Obi-Wan were like the biggest heroes of the clone wars. But there isn't actually any indication of that in the films. From the perspective of the movies Anakin could easily have been seen as just another jedi, and one who was killed by Vader during the purge. OT or PT Tatooine is a remote planet that likely doesn't get many jedi visitors so I doubt anyone there would know of Anakin. 

As far as the split personality thing goes, as others have said in the movies it's more like "Anakin isn't my name anymore." Referring to himself in third person as he does in the EU (and the Emperor sort of makes it sounds like they're two different people in the SE) is more of a metaphorical thing that fits with Obi-Wan's certain point of view speech. As for why Vader seemed to adopt a new identity unlike Palpatine or Dooku, well those two kept their names for political purposes. Anakin could have still pretended to be Anakin after he turned (the propaganda being that the hero of the republic has become the hero of the empire) but with the addition of the suit I think he was given a rebranding as a symbol of terror that strikes fear into the hearts of the remaining jedi and rebels. If that's what Palpatine was going for with the suit makeover then it makes sense that the hero Anakin persona would be dropped in favor of a cold and faceless imperial killing machine.

Author
Time

Always wondered how Luke didn't get word of the famous Jedi who has the same last name but remember the emperor erased any existence of the Jedi but many people must have heard about him but they where most likely  senators who the emperor came down hard on plus Tatooine is far from the core worlds where people where NOT likely to actually have seen or even herd about Jedi 20 years after

"There's been a rebellion, sir. Don't worry. The situation is under control. I'm sorry, sir. It's time for you to leave."