logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 286

Author
Time

Fantasia 1940

My niece has really been spending a lot of time with me, so I like to subtly expose her to music she might not hear. I figured the best introduction she could get to classical, would be one of the ways I was exposed. Fantasia, while I find modern releases of it to be appalling, it is still a good film. I was watching it, and was reminded of how beautiful Disney's art was back then. It kind of saddens me, that they don't do animation work on that level anymore. In fact without Pixar, they wouldn't have any output.

It's a shame they didn't make more Fantasias. Fantasia 2000 was okay, but wasn't really on the level that the original was. Beethoven's 5th was a war of Nacho chips? Fantasia made a lot of lesser known pieces, standard repertoire. I think good quality sequels could have done the same. I'm also shocked that neither film contained any Mozart, Brahms, Handel, Ravel, or Wagner pieces.

I know a Fantasia 2006 was proposed, but never finished. Some pieces ended up being shorts.

"The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won’t last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you’ll be able to project it on a 20’ by 40’ screen with perfect quality. I think it’s the director’s prerogative, not the studio’s to go back and reinvent a movie." - George Lucas

<span> </span>

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

^If only Ryan Gosling wasn't his usual, unlikeable douchebag self ...

 Did you see Drive?

Author
Time

I rewatched Back to the Future recently. Man, that movie never gets old.

It's amazing how off some of the predictions about 2015 in the sequel were, though.

“That Darth Vader, man. Sure does love eating Jedi.”

Author
Time

There's still some time until october. Who knows what the next fashion show may bring?

Ceci n’est pas une signature.

Author
Time

Cinderella.

Surprised by liking it. The relationship between the King and the Prince was really really really unexpected and touching. 

Still can't stand Helena Bonham Carter, and the narration in the film was painfully unnecessary and detracted from some really good moments. 

Author
Time

Watched "Back to the Future".  Totally absurd, but I got a kick out of it.  B+

Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side

Emperor Jar-Jar
“Back when we made Star Wars, we just couldn’t make Palpatine as evil as we intended. Now, thanks to the miracles of technology, it is finally possible. Finally, I’ve created the movies that I originally imagined.” -George Lucas on the 2007 Extra Extra Special HD-DVD Edition

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Trooperman said:

Watched "Back to the Future"... B+

 

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

eXistenZ (1999)

1.8 Whats out of 5 Huhs.

The ultimate film for people who complained that Inception's dream sequences weren't, well, "dreamy" enough. Basically Videodrome meets Inception, but not as clever nor nearly as good as either of those films. If you're looking for some awkward laughs, then definitely check it out, otherwise just watch Videodrome or Inception again. This just boils down to nonsense.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

^If only Ryan Gosling wasn't his usual, unlikeable douchebag self ...

 Did you see Drive?

Nope, can't say I have. 

Author
Time

Dolores Claiborne (1995) - A

High Spirits (1988)

Starts out strong, but once the story moves away from the antics of Peter O'Toole's character and focuses in on Steve Guttenberg's, it quickly loses itself. Guttenberg just isn't a great leading man at the best of times; coupling him with a poorly executed ghostly love story surely doesn't help any. 

B-

Greystroke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes (1984)

The story and acting's great, but the editing ... not so much; one gets the sense that scenes crucial to the flow of the story were left on the cutting room floor.

Oh, and dubbing an English accent over Andie MacDowell's performance? Very poor move -- especially when her character's supposed to be American.

A-

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975)

So, Nicholson and Scatman Crothers were in a pair of films together, eh? Without a doubt, this is definitely the better of the two. ;-P

A+

Man of La Mancha (1972)

Peter O'Toole's performance in this film is another perfect example of why the man's one of my favourite actors; with the mediocre singing and the lousy Don Quixote makeup working against the movie, it easily could have collapsed in on itself, but O'Toole -- with his ability to put fiery passion and conviction into each and every one of his lines -- kept the film aloft.

A

Full Metal Jacket (1987)

Once R. Lee Ermey goes out with a bang, my interest in the rest of the film goes out with a whimper. That said, it's not a bad movie -- not in the least; it's certainly one of the few Kubrick films I've seen that I wouldn't mind watching again (the first half of it, that is).

A

Treed Murray (2001) - A

Groundhog Day (1993) - A+

Sex, Lies, and Videotape (1989)

This movie wasn't at all what I expected it to be, and that's good; a movie where James Spader plays a smarmy pervert who tries to blackmail an unfaithful husband with the videotaped evidence of his infidelity wouldn't have been even half as strong a film as the one I actually ended up watching.

A+

Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure (1989)

This is going against the grain, but I didn't like this movie very much. Bill & Ted are just too stupid and annoying for me to root for them, and the way the historical figures reacted to their experiences -- though obviously done for comedic effect -- just rubbed me the wrong.

C

12:01 PM (1990)

This is basically the mirror image of Groundhog Day -- ie. another story dealing with a man caught in an inescapable time loop; instead of being funny and ending on a high note, however, it's deadly serious and ends on a downer.

Kurtwood Smith gives an excellent performance and I'd definitely recommend that anyone who likes Groundhog Day to check it out, preferably one after the other. If you decide to watch them side-by-side, though, definitely watch 12:01 PM before Groundhog Day; going straight from the upbeat, optimistic ending of Groundhog Day to the very nihilistic one of 12:01 PM would probably ruin your watching experience.

A+

Author
Time

Easter weekend films:

"It's the Easter Beagle, Charlie Brown" 1974 - 4 / 5

"The Prince of Egypt" 1998 - 3.5 / 5
A nicely done animated film from the 90s. Didn't care too much for the songs but they weren't bad.

"The Passion of the Christ" 2004 - 5 / 5
I can't wait for ssj's fanedit, redubbing all the dialogue.

"The Ten Commandments" 1956 - 5 / 5
This is a wonderful Classic Hollywood epic, the kind of film that doesn't get made anymore. I'd love to see a great modern director take this exact script and remake it, without going to extremes.

"Easter Yeggs" 1947 - 5 / 5
Bugs murders the Easter Bunny.

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Mad Max - Not at all what I expected when I watched the Fury Road trailer and snippets of The Road Warrior, but it's alright. The pacing is insanely uneven and you never get a clear sense what the villains are doing, but the opening car chase is awesome - even if the film goes downhill once it's over - and Miller certainly shows he can direct. 3.1 out of 5.

Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief - Awesome. You could view this through a journalist's eye and say that it's very much a "gotcha!" documentary and thus not very objective ("I wanted to hear from people inside scientology!"). Plus, it's a bit weird to see former heads of the church all point to Miscavige without ever really admitting / apologizing for the horrible things they probably have done to (ex-)members, but it's such a fascinating documentary about such a fascinating subject that I can forgive those flaws. Also, Bohemian Rhapsody has never sounded so intense. 4.3 out of 5.

Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior - Better than the original, not quite great. 3.6 out of 5. 

Mission: Impossible II - This HAS to be among the most boring blockbusters released in the last 20 years or so. The slow-motion didn't help either. Even Cruise looked unusually bored. 2 out of 5.

Mission: Impossible III - Philip Seymour Hoffman is the villain. That's cool, I guess. It's pretty much what you'd expect from a J.J. Abrams M:I films a flashy (both literally and figuratively speaking) action film that's almost instantly forgettable. Fun while it lasts. 3.4 out of 5.

Westworld - Aside from its (at the time) interesting ideas and concepts, and Yul Brynner as the most terrifying cowboy put on screen, there's not much to see here. Some Carpenter-esque qualities and it has ideas that might have inspired films such as The Terminator and The Cabin in the Woods, but the film is by no means a masterpiece. 3 out of 5.

Author
Time

The Hobbit:The Battle of Five Armies.

I don't want to get into a whole debate about this film since I think that has been done to death, let's just say that I enjoyed it.  I love the books, and I love Jackson's live action take on Middle Earth so knowing this is the last time it will be seen was kind of sad.  Still it was a good ride and I understand people not being happy with the CGI stunts and I would rather have real stunt men too.  That being said in this day and age it's hard for me to get mad about them.  I mean when the choices are between having a real person risk getting hurt to make the film or just using a computer effect, I can't really say they should put a real person at risk with out feeling bad.

One thing I do think they screwed up with in giving the Archenstone some sort of magical hold on Thorin that he had to fight off like the Ring.  In the book it was just simple greed and the fact that in the warrior culture that he came from you don't give up anything that is yours to someone else because that makes you look too weak and Bilbo ended up being the bridge between the warriors culture of the Dwarves and the peaceful town culture of the river people.

Still the rest of the film was good so I can just ignore that.

One not, am I the only one who thinks the MPAA rating system is broken when this film gets a PG13 and not an R rating?  I mean I lost count of the number of heads that went flying in this movie and the number of people burned alive.  When I was a kid slasher films didn't go this far and some of the gore is on par with Violent Shit, a series that was banned or edited in many countries when I was a kid.  Yet movies can still get an R rating just for mentioning sex or having cursing in them.  To me that is just messed up and I enjoy the way Peter Jackson has fun with gore, it's the MPAA that screwed up.  This is one of the more violent films I have ever seen and I would not watch it in a room with children.

Still as I said I liked it and I did tear up at the end knowing this was the last time I would see Jackson's Middle Earth. 

7.8/10

Author
Time

Mondess122 said:

Mad Max

 Another Mad Max review?

Can't we get Beyond Thunderdome?!

Author
Time

I must be one of only two people on the planet who actually gets some enjoyment out of Beyond Thunderdome.

Author
Time

The first time I saw it was as a kid on cable in parts, and it ruined MM for me for quite some time. Years later in college I finally gave it another go and saw what Miller was trying to get at and realized that he kind of gave up after the death of his creative partner. This combined with a bigger scale weakens the film and it never quite gets off the ground. That said there is some good stuff in there, and it remains watchable every so often.

This ties in partially to some of what I've been watching.

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Indescribably, gleefully obliterating the fourth and all other walls. The fresh energy displayed here is the troupe at their finest, and I've always felt the low budget only increases the realism of the locale. The Criterion LD is a joy, though Sony's BD is a revelation.

Ultimate balls.

Life of Brian

The greatest "comedy" ever mounted, next to Dr. Strangelove. It is equally funny for the mind, and makes you laugh so hard your brain hurts. Intertwined is true societal criticism that is both applicable and pointed. It is a shame that this picture had such a terrible time getting released and distributed, as the point is to ridicule and make fun of the idiotic ways people can take religion--and never ever attacking Christ, his teachings or the Bible itself. Additionally the barbs at the terrible Biblical epic style are hysterical. Criterion's LD and DVD port have color not in the Sony remaster, which despite having more detail is DNR'd a bit and washed out looking. Best audio is the Dolby Stereo on the LD. Sony let the BD go OOP which is damn frustrating.

Masterpiece. Brilliant in every way. Hysterical. Magical. If only everybody here could agree with the UK that it is the Python's finest achievement.

Meaning of Life

Beyond frustrating, rushed, slipshod, annoying at many times, terribly unfunny in many places. This is a mess of a picture that ultimately NEVER works because they rushed into production without a break, creative recharge, or even decent material. The sketches never flow, they merely bang into one another, and what should be hysterical (Sex education etc) fails to spark. Other bits are painfully unfunny ("Every sperm"), pointless (all the couple on vacation bits), and downright disgusting (Creosote. Good grief.). It drags on so badly that one wishes the "Get on with it!" extras could have been reassembled to yell for the remainder of the feature. A criminal waste, made only worse by a mindbogglingly long Gilliam "short" that precedes the film for almost 20 minutes!

An extremely over-generous 2 balls out of 4. Primarily for the liver donor sketch. Uni's BD is at least cheap enough and the new hour long discussion with the five remaining Pythons is better than the film itself.

Now I've begun watching Gilliam pictures, something which I haven't done very much of due to his trademark lack of narrative focus.

Jabberwocky

Something of a favorite of mine, as it was my mother's who first showed it to me many years ago. The style, period setting, and diseased Middle Ages on a low budget is done to perfection! This is almost like Grail II but much more serious and with a very dark bent throughout. Michael Palin is wonderful in the lead, but other than the atmosphere and funny bits here and there the film begins to drag because the narrative never really develops.

3 balls out of 4, and I like the movie far more than I should. Needs a BD with the original mono.

Time Bandits

Lovely, wonderful fantasy that works only if you can subdue any desire for narrative focus. This are never quite explained, they just seem to happen. Since I'm seeing this for the first time I equated it more with the way a child would react to things that they may not understand. This childlike reasoning worked for me until the ending which I felt was not only inadequate, abrupt and to be honest rather pissed me off.

Not to mention that the Harry Potter parallels that keep popping up make me again lament that WB didn't embrace Gilliam's madness as JK Rowling wanted. They would have at least been interesting and dangerous films then.

The Criterion LD is one of the finest CLV titles I've ever seen. The new restored transfers seem to lose a lot of the old colors.

3.5 balls out of 4, I guess...it's rather hard to say.

Brazil

If ever there was a picture that needed to be seen multiple times. The impact only dawns on you through multiple viewings. The societal commentary is spot-on, I enjoy the Orwellian tones, the performances are spot-on..but yet it just never seems to work as fully as it should. To me the comedic and almost cartoon-ish elements continually threaten to overwhelm the inherent evil of the totalitarian government and prevent the haunting climax from reaching its full potential. It's a great experience in its uncut form, a good movie that sadly influenced far too many people into making their films look cartoony, but again Gilliam's secondary narrative harms the picture immeasurably.

4 balls out of 4. The Criterion LD box is one of the great video releases of all time in terms of its massive scope. The presentation is also outstanding for the format.

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time

captainsolo said:

Meaning of Life

Beyond frustrating, rushed, slipshod, annoying at many times, terribly unfunny in many places. This is a mess of a picture that ultimately NEVER works because they rushed into production without a break, creative recharge, or even decent material. The sketches never flow, they merely bang into one another, and what should be hysterical (Sex education etc) fails to spark. Other bits are painfully unfunny ("Every sperm"), pointless (all the couple on vacation bits), and downright disgusting (Creosote. Good grief.). It drags on so badly that one wishes the "Get on with it!" extras could have been reassembled to yell for the remainder of the feature. A criminal waste, made only worse by a mindbogglingly long Gilliam "short" that precedes the film for almost 20 minutes!

An extremely over-generous 2 balls out of 4. Primarily for the liver donor sketch. Uni's BD is at least cheap enough and the new hour long discussion with the five remaining Pythons is better than the film itself.

I really like "Meaning of Life". I'd give it 3.5 balls out of 4. I've only watched it once though, and I was stoned, but I laughed my balls off.

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.

Author
Time

DrCrowTStarwars said:

One thing I do think they screwed up with in giving the Archenstone some sort of magical hold on Thorin that he had to fight off like the Ring.  In the book it was just simple greed and the fact that in the warrior culture that he came from you don't give up anything that is yours to someone else because that makes you look too weak and Bilbo ended up being the bridge between the warriors culture of the Dwarves and the peaceful town culture of the river people.

 The Arkenstone had some degree of magical hold on Bilbo, at least, in the book (according to what I read just yesterday). I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know how it's portrayed, but it seemed like more than simple greed in the book.

Author
Time

"Soylent Green" (1973).  Classic 1970s dystopia film.  A+

Episode II: Shroud of the Dark Side

Emperor Jar-Jar
“Back when we made Star Wars, we just couldn’t make Palpatine as evil as we intended. Now, thanks to the miracles of technology, it is finally possible. Finally, I’ve created the movies that I originally imagined.” -George Lucas on the 2007 Extra Extra Special HD-DVD Edition

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Neglify said:

I really like "Meaning of Life". I'd give it 3.5 balls out of 4. I've only watched it once though, and I was stoned, but I laughed my balls off.

There's too many stoners, drunks, drunk stoners, and stoned drunks on this board. =P 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Kalifornia (1993) - B

The Hot Spot (1990)

Good thing I like Jennifer Connelly, Jack Nance, William Sadler, and Virginia Madsen's body; Don Johnson's wooden performance certainly isn't riveting.

C

Meet the Parents (2000) - B

Westworld (1973)

My opinion of the picture more-or-less lines up with Mondress'. There's nothing I can add to what he's already said.

B

The Man in the Iron Mask (1998)

Too many non-French accents and Leo's uneven performance aside, I thought this movie was alright. Not great, but certainly watchable. Besides, I like seeing heroes wear black and red. =P

B

The Ultimate Warrior (1975)

I think I'm starting to become a fan of Yul Brynner.

B

Coma (1978)

Judging by the plot description, I figured this movie was going to be something I'd enjoy watching. Nothing stellar, mind you, but still engrossing. As misfortune would have it, though, it bored me right out of my skull. I'm not going to say it was bad, but there wasn't a single thing about it that drew my interest or attention.

Frankly, I think the film could have been improved significantly had another actress, one with more screen presence, been cast to play the main character; the actress they hired was dull as dishwater, so there was no way in hell I was going to care about her character or what happened to her.

On a brighter note, I did get off on seeing Rip Torn, Ed Harris, and Tom Selleck in this picture, before they were anybody.

C

The Land Before Time II: The Great Valley Adventure (1994)

I liked this movie when I was a kid, so of course I expected to hate it viewing it as an adult. Turns out, though, that it wasn't bad; animation's decent and the songs -- though nothing memorable -- aren't terrible.

Of course, I still don't see what it was about this movie -- or this series in general -- that appealed to me as a kid. I guess anything with dinosaurs just rocked my world when I was younger.

C

The Fan (1996)

I love Robert De Niro. Almost any movie -- regardless of how innately mediocre it is at its core -- can be made a hundred times more entertaining by his mere presence. Having Nine Inch Nails' "Closer to God" played over-and-over again a ludicrous amount of times throughout the picture certainly didn't hurt its watchability, either.

B+

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

Neglify said:

I really like "Meaning of Life". I'd give it 3.5 balls out of 4. I've only watched it once though, and I was stoned, but I laughed my balls off.

There's too many stoners, drunks, drunk stoners, and stoned drunks on this board. =P 

I guess that means you're in the square minority? 

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.

Author
Time

"12 Angry Men" 1957 - 5 / 5
An undisputed masterpiece. This is how to adapt a stage play properly.

"Near Dark" 1987 - 4 / 5
Kathryn Bigelow cut her teeth on "The Loveless", then showed us she knew how to make a goddamn movie with "Near Dark". It's a broody horror that cares more about atmosphere than gore. It's a creepy, funny tale that has a deserved cult following.

"Martyrs" 2008 - 2.5 / 5
This is a disturbing, bloody and shocking film. I'd love it except that I wasn't able to feel any interest in the main characters. By the time the plot is fully revealed, I was pretty bored.

"Days of Heaven" 1978 - 4 / 5
Shortly after starting shooting, Terrence Malick threw out the script and had the actors improvise to get the feel for the characters and story. It took him 2 years to edit the movie, because he had trouble piecing together his own film into a coherent story.

And you sure can tell. This is a difficult movie to get through (for me at least). The visuals are stunning and as always, the atmosphere Malick creates is beautiful. But the acting and dialogue, especially the narration, feel stilted and unnatural. It almost ruins the "real life" aspect that Malick is so great at showing in film.

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.