logo Sign In

4K restoration on Star Wars — Page 14

Author
Time

I'm just saying...  I just don't want to get my hopes up. 

“In the future it will become even easier for old negatives to become lost and be “replaced” by new altered negatives. This would be a great loss to our society. Our cultural history must not be allowed to be rewritten.” - George Lucas

Author
Time

While it's true there's no real way to know, didn't this all start with someone's resume who said a restoration was completed during his tenure? If that's true, the footage in the demo reel should be "finished" at least to the point that someone could say they were completed.

Remember the escape pod door... it's blue on the demo reels... grey on bd. Methinks this dcp is unrelated

Dboman said:

I don't care about spelling! I just want to find a mirror!

Author
Time

Cobra Kai said:

gizzy2000 said:

Disappointing about the blu-ray, but this means that whatever they played at the Plaza Atlanta wasn't the new 4k scan right?

 But we really don't know that this wasn't sourced from the new 4k scan, do we?  How could we be sure they didn't just recreate the 2011 version from the new scan?

 No, this was 100% 2011 Blu-ray and now completely unrelated to the 4K RMW scan this thread is about. It was identical to the '11 in changes/effects, and I believe as well as in coloration and cropping, though I'm no expert. I don't think the Plaza thing is worth discussing any further as it's only going to distract from the real conversation of what we think the RMW website listing means for the future of the trilogy: which negatives did they scan, and who's doing what, if anything, with said scan?

Author
Time

WedgeCyan said:

Methinks this dcp is unrelated

 Indeed. It should be dropped from the conversation. In fact, I've already forgotten about it. 

*quietly sobs*

Author
Time

Cobra Kai said:

darklordoftech said:

Cobra Kai said:

gizzy2000 said:

Disappointing about the blu-ray, but this means that whatever they played at the Plaza Atlanta wasn't the new 4k scan right?

 But we really don't know that this wasn't sourced from the new 4k scan, do we?  How could we be sure they didn't just recreate the 2011 version from the new scan?

1. There's no way that Disney would recreate the 2011 coloring and Ben call.

2. The video of the new scan doesn't have the same coloring as 2011.

1.  Why wouldn't they if that is what is on the "official" blu-ray?

2. The Reliance video might not reflect the final work. 

I'm just saying I don't think there's any way to know unless we hear from somebody that works at RMW.

 1. You really think that the blue tint and crushed blacks were part of Lucas's vision rather than a side-effect of color correction?

Author
Time

DarthShackleford said:

 No, this was 100% 2011 Blu-ray and now completely unrelated to the 4K RMW scan this thread is about. It was identical to the '11 in changes/effects, and I believe as well as in coloration and cropping, though I'm no expert. I don't think the Plaza thing is worth discussing any further as it's only going to distract from the real conversation of what we think the RMW website listing means for the future of the trilogy: which negatives did they scan, and who's doing what, if anything, with said scan?

 That's good to know. I bet they scanned the 1997 SE because unfortunately that is what the "official" negative of the film is. I don't think anyone would go through the effort of adding future SE changes from 04 and 11 because the changes are so minute and pointless and would be a waste of time. That being said, I also don't think they would re-release the 97 version because the added CGI looks so dated and there would be no market for it really at all, no one wants an earlier version of the SE, people just want the OOT. So I really do think the new scan was made in order to restore the unaltered film, maybe i'm just getting my hopes up too high but it's really all that seems to make sense

Author
Time

DarthShackleford said:

Does this mean there's now a better chance that the RMW scan could be OOT? Weren't we assuming '97 because we thought it tied into the Plaza? Or did the screenshot comparison rule out OOT?

It was only a hunch that the Plaza was showing the RMW work, a hunch that was clearly wrong if the colors were the same as the 2011 release.

Here's another comparison between releases:

Top Blu-ray, Bottom RMW.

Top corrected GOUT, bottom corrected 97 SE:

It seems like the lightsaber compositing of the RMW matches the Blu-ray, but that could simply be because the original lightsaber elements are faded, accounting for similar results in both shots. If they simply scanned the '97 version, it would seem to me that the compositing would match the bottom shot. So I'm still thinking that the RMW is a new 4K scan of the original elements which have been assembled in a way which is similar to the 2011 version.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time

I think the RMW looks more like the '97 SE than the blu ray

Author
Time

gizzy2000 said:

I think the RMW looks more like the '97 SE than the blu ray

 In terms of overall color balance, absolutely.

However, I don't think that color would be much of a factor when determining the origin of a particular element, as any scan of the original negative would require new colortiming, which could look like whatever they wanted it to look like. The area of interest to me would be the lightsaber effects, as these are the only parts of the shot which would need to be scanned from separate low quality (and thus probably more degraded) originals. If you look at the progression of Vader's saber from the GOUT to the RMW version, it gets progressively wider and blurrier. If the RMW shot was simply scanned from the SE interpositive made in '97, there would be no need to re-composite the lightsabers and Vader's saber would be as sharp as it is in the '97 screenshot. As it appears even more degraded than in the Blu-ray, the logical answer is that it couldn't possibly be a simple scan of the '97 SE.

Short answer: A '97 SE scan would have identical lightsabers to the '97 screenshot. They don't, so it's not a scan of the '97 print.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time

yes I think you might be right. Now the question is, what is the purpose of the scan then?

Author
Time

Especially since they scrapped the Star Wars 3D thing too. I can't believe Disney would follow through with completing the scan or restoration or whatever the hell Lucas had them doing when Disney bought LFL.

Author
Time

I want so badly for this to be for an OOT release...but I don't want to get my hopes up. But I don't really see what else it would be for...

Author
Time

I also went back to page 2 of this thread and looked at the lightsaber flash comparisons and you can tell that (other than color) the flashes are identical to the blu ray and not the GOUT. The only possibility is that they color corrected the blu ray and edited out SE changes and re-added the real scenes, which honestly, I could live with, if they do it right

Author
Time

gizzy2000 said:

I also went back to page 2 of this thread and looked at the lightsaber flash comparisons and you can tell that (other than color) the flashes are identical to the blu ray and not the GOUT. The only possibility is that they color corrected the blu ray and edited out SE changes and re-added the real scenes, which honestly, I could live with, if they do it right

 I think this is a more a result of the highly flawed transfer of the GOUT... the contrast and colors were all mucked up iirc

Dboman said:

I don't care about spelling! I just want to find a mirror!

Author
Time

gizzy2000 said:

I also went back to page 2 of this thread and looked at the lightsaber flash comparisons and you can tell that (other than color) the flashes are identical to the blu ray and not the GOUT. The only possibility is that they color corrected the blu ray and edited out SE changes and re-added the real scenes, which honestly, I could live with, if they do it right

I am sure that this is a different scan than the Blu-ray, because if you look at my comparisons the new version has a different warping pattern than the Blu-ray:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/83700/picture:1

My conclusions:

This is a new 4K scan of the original negatives and elements, with an improved dirt and scratches detection and elimination algorithm (they boast on their website that manual cleanup is not done on the films they process). It has new colortiming, similar but not always identical to the '97 version of the film (see the running stormtroopers and the green C-3PO). There is no evidence for or against '97 SE changes, but as this is not a simple scan of the '97 interpositive, such changes seem unlikely to be included. The evidence leans in favor of an OUT release which has yet to be announced by Disney.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time

I really don't think there is a new scan at all.  I think it is just the same 2004 master, but taken from a copy that has something closer to the correct colors, before they got screwed up.  This non-crappy version was then upconverted to 4k and further work done on it for the 3D release that didn't happen.

Maybe they'll do something with it in the future, maybe they won't.  At this point it's impossible to say.  But one thing's for sure: any hypothetical release of the unaltered versions is entirely unrelated to this.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I'm starting to think this is just the 2011 BR scan but before they passed it back to Lucas to muck about with. I'm not sure if this is a good or bad thing.

Edit: Yes Harmy, NeverarGreat's screenshot is convincing though. It's hard to argue that that isn't a scan of a different film cell. I just tried to make it line up exactly myself and it's impossible.

Now I'm back to confused again LOL

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

The fact that it says "4k 16-bit" by itself should be enough evidence it's a new scan, because those words don't describe the old scan at all.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Fang Zei said:

The fact that it says "4k 16-bit" by itself should be enough evidence it's a new scan, because those words don't describe the old scan at all.

Furthermore, if you ask me, upconverting and calling it "4k" is unacceptable, even if it's the OOT with 1977 colors.

Author
Time

NeverarGreat said:

I am sure that this is a different scan than the Blu-ray, because if you look at my comparisons the new version has a different warping pattern than the Blu-ray:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/83700/picture:1

My conclusions:

This is a new 4K scan of the original negatives and elements, with an improved dirt and scratches detection and elimination algorithm (they boast on their website that manual cleanup is not done on the films they process). It has new colortiming, similar but not always identical to the '97 version of the film (see the running stormtroopers and the green C-3PO). There is no evidence for or against '97 SE changes, but as this is not a simple scan of the '97 interpositive, such changes seem unlikely to be included. The evidence leans in favor of an OUT release which has yet to be announced by Disney.

Sounds like a possible scenario, and very much a Disney like approach - release the classic original films but with new digital compositing.

It should be noted that the before and after sample with the droids in the desert seems to be the old 2004 Lowry fiasco. It's old.

But the short segments in the other demo reel looks fantastic in terms of color and appears to be from a different transfer, still the ugly digital lightsaber compositing introduced in 2004 is present.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore said:

It should be noted that the before and after sample with the droids in the desert seems to be the old 2004 Lowry fiasco. It's old.

What before and after sample? I didn't see anything that shows the droids in the desert.

Author
Time

darklordoftech said:

msycamore said:

It should be noted that the before and after sample with the droids in the desert seems to be the old 2004 Lowry fiasco. It's old.

What before and after sample? I didn't see anything that shows the droids in the desert.

 Posted earlier in the thread: http://vimeo.com/86986263

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

msycamore said:

darklordoftech said:

msycamore said:

It should be noted that the before and after sample with the droids in the desert seems to be the old 2004 Lowry fiasco. It's old.

What before and after sample? I didn't see anything that shows the droids in the desert.

 Posted earlier in the thread: http://vimeo.com/86986263

Thank you.