logo Sign In

Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * SPOILER THREAD * — Page 18

Author
Time
 (Edited)

unamochilla2 said:

Two additional cast members announced and production update: http://www.starwars.com/news/star-wars-episode-vii-production-update

At the end of last year Lucasfilm and Disney invited all young aspiring actors to attend an open casting call for roles in J.J Abrams’ Star Wars Episode VII. The casting calls spanned 11 cities across the US and UK and over 37,000 hopefuls attended, with a further 30,000 submitting applications online.

Having hunted high and low for young and undiscovered talent, the filmmakers are delighted to announce that two actors from the open call call have been cast.

Crystal Clarke is an American actress studying in Glasgow, UK, who has both stage and screen acting experience and is soon to be seen in her first feature, The Moon and the Sun (to be released in 2015). British actor Pip Andersen is a skilled practitioner of parkour, a discipline that involves propelling oneself through any given environment with incredible grace and agility. Pip recently demonstrated this remarkable skill in a Spider-Man ad for Sony.

“The Star Wars universe has always been about discovering and nurturing young talent and in casting Episode VII we wanted to remain absolutely faithful to this tradition. We are delighted that so many travelled to see us at the open casting calls and that we have been able to make Crystal and Pip a part of the film,” said producer and Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy.

Meanwhile, principal photography continues at Pinewood Studios in London after wrapping on location in Abu Dhabi in May.

In August, the team will take a brief two-week hiatus while adjustments to the current production schedule are made as actor Harrison Ford recovers from a leg injury. Harrison is doing well and is looking forward to returning to the set soon. Shooting remains on track to wrap in the fall with the film scheduled for release on December 18, 2015.

 

Here's Pip's showreel. Looks like there'll be some nice acrobatics in these new films.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

I'm assuming this is one of the reasons he was cast.  I wonder who/what he'll be playing?  A descendent of Darth Maul?  He looks more like Spider man in that video than a Jedi or Sith.  Should be interesting...

Author
Time

This Pip fellow is most impressive! I hope the new blood knows what they're getting into! For good or ill, Star Wars is going to be a big chunk of their lives for years to come.

Glad to hear Harrison is on the mend. The whole thing was looking kind of bleak just a few weeks ago.

They haven't teased us with any photos lately. We're overdue. ;)

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Glad to hear Harrison is on the mend. The whole thing was looking kind of bleak just a few weeks ago.

I think that's because the tabloids were reporting a lot of misinformation related to the injury... such as him returning to the U.S. for six months to recover.  Although, his injury was still very serious especially at his age. He's definitely a trooper regardless.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

He's a tough old smuggler for sure.

I'd bet the saga of Harrison's leg becomes a bonus feature on the Blu Ray.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

That Pip guy is an extraordinary parkour athlete so no doubt his talent will be used.

He could play as a cool bounty hunter-type who easily and skillfully escapes tight situations, but my guess is he will acquire a lightsaber.

Wishlist Of Ideas/Suggestions For Improving ROTJ

Author
Time

Good or bad I crave all things Star Wars and enjoy it all. Even that which by all rights shouldn't be enjoyable. Star Wars is my heroin, and even the bad highs are worth my time. Can't wait for this film. Perhaps it will be the greatest Star Wars film yet? But even if it sucks, I will be there and I will rejoice in another trip to a galaxy far far away. 

I am what all Jedi fear to become, and what all Sith wish to be. A GOD!

Author
Time

http://twitter.com/bad_robot/status/486628757780721664

Picture of IMAX camera for Episode VII.  I'm not very familiar with filming equipment, so what's the difference between filming in 35mm and filming with an IMAX camera, if there is a difference. I thought this was going to be filmed using a 35mm camera, unless if it can be filmed in both 35mm and IMAX.

Also, is Tatooine seen in the background a miniature and matte painting?  Kind of looks like its on a set and not on location.

Author
Time

Well, that's interesting. I've never seen that actual camera before, but IMAX is traditionally shot in 70mm, and as far as I'm aware that hasn't changed. Basically, it means being shot in a higher resolution. It won't make a difference to a standard cinema projection, but will look a lot better on the big IMAX screen.

“Ow! It`s hot in here, the butter in my pocket is melting!”

Author
Time
 (Edited)

IMAX cameras don't only shoot on 70mm (actually 65mm) film - they shoot on 65mm film running sideways, so an IMAX frame has about 10 times the surface area of a standard 35mm frame, which also translates to 10 times the resolution - A 35mm camera negative is speculated to hold the resolution of between 6K and 8K, so you're looking at an analog alternative of what would be like 60-80K digital resolution.

Author
Time

Oh yes!

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

The real question, to me, is how they're gonna handle the imax exhibition of the movie.

Imax is expected to start replacing their 15/70 projectors with the 4k+4k laser projectors they've developed, starting here in DC with the smithsonian's three theaters sometime next year. Right now, the two theaters on the mall in downtown DC are 3D-capable but the one out in Chantilly is 2d-only (the digital conversion will make it 3D-capable as well).

I bring all of this up because episode VII will doubtlessly be converted to 3d.

For Star Trek Into Darkness this wasn't a problem, as Paramount sent a single, 15/70 2D print to Chantilly for opening night and a 3D 15/70 to one of the downtown theaters a couple weeks later. For Star Wars, I wonder if I'll even be able to see it in 4k+4k 2D or if 3d will be my only option as far as imax goes.

Looking at the photo in the tweet makes me want to see what that camera is seeing!

Author
Time

What about camera below that was supposedly going to be used to film Episode VII?  Is it going to be shot partially on 35mm and some scenes on IMAX?  Sorry for the questions, but I'm a little confused since it was tweeted months ago that Episode VII was going to be filmed in 35mm and now this IMAX tweet.  Both are official as well.

http://makingstarwars.net/2014/03/wanna-see-one-of-the-custom-cameras-that-will-film-star-wars-episode-vii/

Author
Time

There has yet to be a film that has been shot entirely with IMAX cameras as they are unwieldy and expensive. Only some scenes of the film will be done in IMAX, the rest will be 35mm.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Bigger action set pieces are usually what is shot on IMAX so that when you are in an IMAX theatre, the picture expands and the clarity increases. To my knowledge, no blockbuster movie has been shot entirely on IMAX cameras yet, so I'd doubt they'd shoot the whole movie that way.

Speaking of IMAX, are there literally no 15/70 IMAX theatres at all anymore?

EDIT: I was beat to it I guess.

Author
Time

That's what we had for the longest time where I live. It's the only full sized IMAX in the state. It was bought out by the local theater chain and dropped playing IMAX exclusives films in favor of Hollywood productions.

For a couple years they were probably running at a loss because the studios were only producing 15/70 prints maybe twice a year at best. So they were stuck playing Elysium for most of the year until the last Hobbit was released.

Just a couple months ago they finally sprung the cash to renovate the theater and replace the film projectors with their new digital counterpart. Now they can switch out films any time they like.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

Some people turn their noses up at digital Imax though, calling it "LieMax". I don't know the actual specs myself, but the screen is still pretty huge.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

They call the AMC IMAX screens LieMAX because the screens are so small. I went into one once to see The Dark Knight and the screen was comparable to one you'd find in some people's homes. It was ludicrous.

The new digital projection we have at the 8-story tall IMAX near my house looks brilliant and is still capable of the full IMAX picture format. I think it was the trailer for Guardians of the Galaxy that had some scenes in the full format size and it was breathtaking. It's so big the film engulfs you.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

The one local to me is pretty big. Other theater chains have giant screens now with different names.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Christopher Nolan spoke about the downside of shooting IMAX after TDKR came out. I'd been hoping and praying he would have shot it all IMAX so was glad of the explanation why he couldn't.

He talked about it being less a case of cost and camera size. The cost is negligible with the kind of Blockbusters IMAX is used for and the cameras are getting smaller all the time. Also the spectacular image quality makes it worth putting up with those problems anyway.

The big issue is that they are VERY noisy making recording live dialogue impossible. So far an action setpiece when you are going to dub everything in post anyway it's no problem. But for intimate dialogue scenes it would mean getting all the actors to post-sync their performances, which is usually a bad idea (Unless you're Sergio Leone!).

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

The digital "liemax" theaters use dual 2k projectors and have a 1.9:1 aspect ratio (real imax is 1.44:1). The biggest of the digital imax screens still aren't as big as the 15/70 screens, even if you're just talking about the width. What Imax did was to take the biggest auditorium at a multiplex and renovate it to make the screen go from wall to wall (which it was almost doing anyway) and floor to ceiling. They also removed the first several rows of seats to make the screen closer to the audience.

I'm not sure how the 2k+2k overlap works for 2d movies, but imax argues that it yields an image greater than 4k. In any event, you're still seeing the dmr'd version of the movie, which is supposed to make everything look better whether it's on actual 15/70 film or dual 2k dlp.

For movies that were shot in actual 65mm imax, like Ghost Protocol, I can only imagine that the effect is greatly diminished in the digital theaters. Smaller screen, lower resolution, cropped aspect ratio, and multiplex seating are all pretty far removed from the genuine article.

Star Trek Into Darkness was the first time a movie had been shot in imax and then converted into 3d. Paramount did this because we're in a post-Avatar movie business now. When Nolan wanted to shoot some of The Dark Knight in Imax back in 2007, that's pretty much all there was aside from 35mm and the equivalent digital projection. 3D hadn't truly "arrived," it was only in a few theaters here and there. Cut to 2012, now there are thousands of 3D theaters and only several hundred imax. Stuff like Ghost Protocol and Dark Knight Rises were now the exception to the rule. The moneymaking potential of 3D now outweighed that of imax.

I never got around to seeing Into Darkness in 15/70 out in Chantilly, although I heard the imax shots were matted to 1.66:1 for some reason. In an interview with the vfx guys they said this was to avoid making the AR switch too jarring for the audience. I can't help but think the real reason had something to do with rendering times and all that, but who knows.

Author
Time

Noisy cameras were an issue when the industry transitioned to talking pictures. Cameras were put into soundproof enclosures that made them even more huge, and like rolling a small truck around on the set.

You'd think there would be a lightweight soundproof solution for the IMAX cameras.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Tobar said:

They call the AMC IMAX screens LieMAX because the screens are so small. I went into one once to see The Dark Knight and the screen was comparable to one you'd find in some people's homes. It was ludicrous.

The new digital projection we have at the 8-story tall IMAX near my house looks brilliant and is still capable of the full IMAX picture format. I think it was the trailer for Guardians of the Galaxy that had some scenes in the full format size and it was breathtaking. It's so big the film engulfs you.

Are you sure it's digital? Imax hasn't rolled out the 4k+4k laser tech at any of their 15/70 theaters yet, not to my knowledge.

ETA: Sorry, I misread your post. You meant that your 15/70 theater has both the film projector and the 2k+2k dlp. I've heard this is the case with several of the old, full-sized theaters out there. It allows them to show more stuff, since not every imax release actually gets the 15/70 treatment.

You mentioned it was the only full-sized theater in your state. Out of curiosity, what state are you in? There's a list of all imax theaters (both film and digital) here:

http://www.lfexaminer.com/theaUSA.htm

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

Noisy cameras were an issue when the industry transitioned to talking pictures. Cameras were put into soundproof enclosures that made them even more huge, and like rolling a small truck around on the set.

You'd think there would be a lightweight soundproof solution for the IMAX cameras.

It sure would be the spirit of Star Wars if Ep VII will pioneer somethong useful and particular for the future of filmmaking, just as the OT pioneered certain technology. For all we know, that picture BadRobot posted could be showing off that answer - the future of IMAX cameras.

If that isn't enough, what if VII will then be the first full-length feature film to be shot entirely using IMAX cameras. There is that chance and that would be groundbreakingly awesome :)

Wishlist Of Ideas/Suggestions For Improving ROTJ

Author
Time

Fang Zei said:

You mentioned it was the only full-sized theater in your state. Out of curiosity, what state are you in? There's a list of all imax theaters (both film and digital) here:

http://www.lfexaminer.com/theaUSA.htm

 Arizona. The Arizona Mills has an 8-story screen while the Science Center is 5-stories and the Grand Canyon's is six.

It's interesting that that list still only lists the Mills as having 1570 when I know they also now do digital.

Forum Moderator