
- Time
- Post link
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
All these Fos co-existing in one timeline ... something's bound to implode sooner or later.
Fo' sure? Surely you can't be serious?!DuracellEnergizer said:
All these Fos co-existing in one timeline ... something's bound to implode sooner or later.
http://twister111.tumblr.com
Previous Signature preservation link
twister111 said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
All these Fos co-existing in one timeline ... something's bound to implode sooner or later.Fo' sure?
Sho Nuff!
TV's Frink said:
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
You count as poorly as you communicate. I'm not surprised with those Coke bottle bottoms you call glasses.
I don't get it. You both go from egging each other on to getting offended over that same kind of back-and-forth. It's clear you both have extreme distaste for each other, why not leave it at that?
I've heard the "he started it" / "it's one sided" stuff enough already.
PS- Fo, I like your new user title ;).
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
TV's Frink said:
Neglify said:
The JetFo doth protest too much, methinks.
Who?
Horton Hears A
Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.
Jetrell Fo 1 said:
TV's Frink said:
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
You count as poorly as you communicate. I'm not surprised with those Coke bottle bottoms you call glasses.
JetFo
Fo 0
Fo 1
Fo 2
Fo 3
Ric Fo 1
....
Show me the math error.
bkev said:
I don't get it. You both go from egging each other on to getting offended over that same kind of back-and-forth. It's clear you both have extreme distaste for each other, why not leave it at that?
I've heard the "he started it" / "it's one sided" stuff enough already.
PS- Fo, I like your new user title ;).
I'm offended? Show your work.
Warbler said:
Bingowings said:I also can see why you would find a certain fraternity with Warb from time to time.
please explain to me. I have never once tried to convert you. I have never once tried to force my heterosexuality on you. I have never accused you of forcing your homosexuality on me.
Much to your credit too :-)
No I meant more along the lines of interludes of paranoia and posting something incendiary and then complaining about the heat.
I drop bombs but I expect craters.
It's very annoying to me when I'm invited to watch a movie at a friends house on their new humongous super HD ultra plasma-whatever TV only to realize that all the money they spent on the TV and BD player is for nothing because the motion enhancements are turned on making the film look like a speed up soap opera. Even more annoying when I'm the only one in the room who even notices this and everyone else insists that it's better this way. Ugh...
bkev said:
I don't get it. You both go from egging each other on to getting offended over that same kind of back-and-forth. It's clear you both have extreme distaste for each other, why not leave it at that?
I've heard the "he started it" / "it's one sided" stuff enough already.
PS- Fo, I like your new user title ;).
What I've noticed in the off-topic section is that certain members automatically take the incendiary position of things said in a post and then use that as a way to taunt and "joke" but when they have the tables turned on them they magically become victims. They assume you've said something personal and then don't except any explanation you give after being asked for clarification.
They seem to come from the point of view that they own the off-topic sections and that any outsiders that don't adhere to their methods are immediately scrutinized and labeled.
Since there is little to no moderation here nothing is done about it. You are on you're own. So what do you do? Leave? Defend yourself? Or make a space for yourself to exist so you can post here while fighting the flames?
I have noticed that one cannot make a general statement about anything without it being twisted around and turned back at when they are not welcome here. That being said, there are some good members who do not participate in the hazing but they don't try to discourage it either. I do not fear the hecklers. I am not afraid to fight them so I may participate in other threads. It seems it is the only way to survive in here for some.
On another note, thanks for the compliment. Scotty is awesome and Relics is an awesome TNG episode.
TV's Frink said:
Jetrell Fo 1 said:
TV's Frink said:
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
You count as poorly as you communicate. I'm not surprised with those Coke bottle bottoms you call glasses.
JetFo
Fo 0
Fo 1
Fo 2
Fo 3
Ric Fo 1
....
Show me the math error.
None of these people or personalities exist ...... that is your error.
The Demon Legion says :
All these users claiming to be more than one person is really confusing.
JetFo thru Ric Fo 1 said:
TV's Frink said:
JetFo Thru Ric Fo 1 said:
TV's Frink said:
JetFo, Fo 0 thru Fo 3, and Ric Fo 1...I count six of them.
You count as poorly as you communicate. I'm not surprised with those Coke bottle bottoms you call glasses.
JetFo
Fo 0
Fo 1
Fo 2
Fo 3
Ric Fo 1
....
Show me the math error.
None of these people or personalities exist ...... that is your error.
You are adorable!
Holy shit, will someone please just change the title of the thread to "Tv's Frink VS Jetrell Fo" already?
Possessed said:
Jetrell Fo
Who?
HAHAHA. Oh god, that was so funny. I about spilled my coffee. So fresh! So original! Have you told that joke before? Can't recall ever hearing it. You must be even more original than I am! But in all seriousness, my favorite chinese restaurant is closed today so that is what I'll be bitching about.
Possessed 3.141592653 said:
HAHAHA. Oh god, that was so funny. I about spilled my coffee. So fresh! So original! Have you told that joke before? Can't recall ever hearing it.
I'm not sure what you're talking about.
I'm not sure if I like the new season of Arrested development. Coincidence? Perhaps.
My father and sister are both complete assholes. If I outlive both of them, I'll make sure they have the cheapest funerals possible.
ray_afraid said:
It's very annoying to me when I'm invited to watch a movie at a friends house on their new humongous super HD ultra plasma-whatever TV only to realize that all the money they spent on the TV and BD player is for nothing because the motion enhancements are turned on making the film look like a speed up soap opera. Even more annoying when I'm the only one in the room who even notices this and everyone else insists that it's better this way. Ugh...
It's even worse when people don't know the difference, IMO. I can at least see the appeal of high-refresh rates, and even appreciate them in video games/certain animation.
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
Bingowings said:
I don't try to convert people from heterosexuality, I don't rape or molest people.
I do express my position on discussion boards or in debate when the subject is raised. Why shouldn't I?
I just breezed into the thread, so sorry for my tardiness in this debate.
As for "born with it" or "it's a choice," well from my perspective, there is not any one single answer. We are each individuals and what we do is determined by our backgrounds, our families, our culture, our genetics, our past experiences, the decisions we've made, etc. etc.
So, what may be true for one (he/she was born homosexual) is not necessarily true for the next, who could have been heterosexual but something may or may not have happened that may have rewired their sexual preference. This can easily happen in childhood. It could even be a combination of the the two, having been born with tendencies one way or the other, but an event or non-event pushes you toward homosexuality or heterosexuality.
Many girls who are molested turn toward homosexuality (and no I'm not saying all homosexual women have been molested or that molestation necessarily leads to homosexuality) because of the fear that the grown man placed on her and she now finds that sex acts with men are disgusting. I think it's certainly plausible that her fear, which often turns to hatred, can manifest a girl to prefer being with women over men wherein she would have most likely been heterosexual had her first sex acts with a man were of love and with consent instead of fear and lust. So while it's not necessarily "a choice", it is a decision based upon past experiences and events psychologically.
But, I am convinced there are many homosexuals just born with the desire and no explanation for why, but should there be? I don't really think so, it's just the way of the world.
As far as this "force" thing, I think it's a lack of communication between heterosexuals and homosexuals, and most of the blame can be put on heterosexuals. When a heterosexual says "don't force it on me," I don't think they really think a homosexual is going to try to molest them, but I think they mean "I don't mind your homosexuality, but I'd prefer not to hear about it whatsoever." Is it right? Probably not, but people cannot help but feel very uncomfortable about certain subjects and would prefer not to think about or remotely discuss it, homosexuality is one of those subjects. Furthermore, they may have a staunch disagreement with homosexuality, but they sincerely like the homosexual person, and they simply do not care for the homosexual to try and convince them that "it's okay to be gay."
I know some will roll your eyes, but many Christians sternly believe Homosexuality to be a sin, but they would happily be friends with homosexuals while adamantly disagreeing with their personal choices.
ferris209 said:
. When a heterosexual says "don't force it on me," I don't think they really think a homosexual is going to try to molest them, but I think they mean "I don't mind your homosexuality, but I'd prefer not to hear about it whatsoever." Is it right? Probably not, but people cannot help but feel very uncomfortable about certain subjects and would prefer not to think about or remotely discuss it, homosexuality is one of those subjects. Furthermore, they may have a staunch disagreement with homosexuality, but they sincerely like the homosexual person, and they simply do not care for the homosexual to try and convince them that "it's okay to be gay."
I know some will roll your eyes, but many Christians sternly believe Homosexuality to be a sin, but they would happily be friends with homosexuals while adamantly disagreeing with their personal choices.
A) it is a sin against the God of most forms of Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc for most flavours of Christian, Jew, Muslim etc. It's not a sin against every God or style of absence of God or every human being so trying to reduce the freedoms of others based on a text that claims a God prohibits his devotees from doing something is bound to be met with some degree of opposition.
B) Approval isn't necessary for equality. It's perhaps nicer but not necessary. Very few people campaign for universal approval, rather universal equality like it or not.
C) Many more Heterosexual women have been abused as children so I'm not sure what your observation adds to the debate.
Christianity is meant to promote judgement of self over judgement over others.
Thank heavens I'm not so restricted :-D
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-TVs-Frink-AKA-The-Real-Ric-Olie-vs-the-Infinite-Fos-Thread/topic/16525/
Why on earth would someone think that if a member saw a thread with their name in it that they would blindly enter knowing the wolves await?
Weird .............