logo Sign In

Last movie seen — Page 235

Author
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Aliens (1986) - 6.5/10

 

 I'm really not sure what you're trying to get across here...

SilverWook said:

That scene has bugged me since 1979. (Not to mention being totally freaky.) There has to be a easier way to dispatch Ripley than shove a magazine down her throat. And it sure isn't going to look like an accident, or the Alien. Was this supposed to emphasize Ash's major malfunction?

Yes.

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time

1. Disbelief

2. Panic

3. Suicide

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Thanks for clearing that up! :)

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:



Ryan McAvoy said:

1. Disbelief

2. Panic

3. Suicide
Because Duracell liked Aliens? Or maybe he didn't like it enough?
He liked it .5 more than the live action Garfield movie. I'm beginning to think his ratings are going to come back and bite him.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'd say 6.5 is a fair grade for a guns-n-muscles remake of Alien. I'd probably rate it a bit higher, but that seems like a fair score to me.

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time

ray_afraid said:

I'd say 6.5 is a fair grade for a guns-n-muscles remake of Alien. I'd probably rate it a bit higher, but that seems like a fair score to me.

 Now there's two crazy people.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

That scene has bugged me since 1979. (Not to mention being totally freaky.) There has to be a easier way to dispatch Ripley than shove a magazine down her throat. And it sure isn't going to look like an accident, or the Alien. Was this supposed to emphasize Ash's major malfunction?

Pretty much. Either in the commentary or the making of Scott mentions that he was going for freaky and sexual (the magazine bit) with the scene. The malfunctioning android's idea of sexual intercourse, or something to that effect.

Author
Time

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013)

Caught this last night after forces beyond my control forced me to miss out on catching The Last Days on Mars on the last day it was showing here. I really enjoyed it. It was a fun movie.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time
 (Edited)

ray_afraid said:

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'm sure twenty-six is quite young from a certain point of view. But perhaps I should bring up the fact that I am a fan of older movies, prefer them to newer movies by a very long shot, and that my opinion has nothing to do with "Duh, old movies suck"?

As for why I rated Aliens the way I did ...

I didn't like any of the Marines. They were all asinine douchebags, and I was happy to see them die.

I find it pathetic that a group of Marines -- knowing they're going up a whole goddamn hive of nasty man-killing bugs with acidic blood -- armour themselves in bulletproof vests and helmets only, leaving the rest of their bodies open to damage. I could understand it if this movie were set in the present, but it's set in the far future; am I really supposed to believe that a future civilization capable of building FTL-capable starships can't come up with battlesuits or smart armour?

I don't like how all the mystique and ambiguity of the creature from the original film is taken away by making its species nothing more than giant, stupid ants driven by instinct and nothing more.  

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

ray_afraid said:

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'm sure twenty-six is quite young from a certain point of view.

 Maybe it is, but I thought you were younger. No big deal.

Ray’s Lounge
Biggs in ANH edit idea
ROTJ opening edit idea

Author
Time

For the record, a few of my favorite films...

The Third Man (1949)

Solaris (1972)

Metropolis (1927)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Theatrical Cut) (1977)

Blade Runner (Workprint) (1982)

Citizen Kane (1941)

Jaws (1975)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

… and I'm thirteen.

It's a question of taste, not age.

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Oh wow, you were born after the Y2K disaster that destroyed most of our societies.  Luckily we were able to rebuild quickly.

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

I find it pathetic that a group of Marines -- knowing they're going up a whole goddamn hive of nasty man-killing bugs with acidic blood -- armour themselves in bulletproof vests and helmets only, leaving the rest of their bodies open to damage.

Except that they didn't know that. No one really believed Ripley and the marines had never faced anything as terrifying as a Xenomorph before.

That's what bugs(no pun intended) me about the Aliens franchise. One character refers to their mission as a "bug hunt." And now suddenly that's the defacto term for xenos. Whatever the bugs they had to deal with before (most likely a Starship Troopers reference) were not related to Xenomorphs in the least.

 

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

ray_afraid said:

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'm sure twenty-six is quite young from a certain point of view. But perhaps I should bring up the fact that I am a fan of older movies, prefer them to newer movies by a very long shot, and that my opinion has nothing to do with "Duh, old movies suck"?

As for why I rated Aliens the way I did ...

I didn't like any of the Marines. They were all asinine douchebags, and I was happy to see them die.

I find it pathetic that a group of Marines -- knowing they're going up a whole goddamn hive of nasty man-killing bugs with acidic blood -- armour themselves in bulletproof vests and helmets only, leaving the rest of their bodies open to damage. I could understand it if this movie were set in the present, but it's set in the far future; am I really supposed to believe that a future civilization capable of building FTL-capable starships can't come up with battlesuits or smart armour?

I don't like how all the mystique and ambiguity of the creature from the original film is taken away by making its species nothing more than giant, stupid ants driven by instinct and nothing more.  

 Pvt. Vasquez would like a word with you. ;)

And I don't see how Hicks could be considered an douchebag.

I read somewhere that not long after the movie came out, Marine recruiters were hanging Vasquez posters in their office windows, until upper brass ordered them to stop.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Hudson's the only one that really crosses the line into annoying, I think.

Even then, they at least make him tolerable.

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Tack said:

For the record, a few of my favorite films...

The Third Man (1949)

Solaris (1972)

Metropolis (1927)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Theatrical Cut) (1977)

Blade Runner (Workprint) (1982)

Citizen Kane (1941)

Jaws (1975)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

… and I'm thirteen.

It's a question of taste, not age.

 Jesus christ, that's impressive viewing for 13. ^ Some of my favourite movies (Especially anything with Orson Welles involvement... Kino Lorber's Restored Blu-Ray of 'The Stranger' is on it's way from Amazon right now, huzzah!) except 2001 which is excruciatingly tedious, lifeless and overrated. Love all other Kubrick films but not that.

btw Watched Hobbit2 for a second time this evening. Really enjoyed it much more than the first viewing where I was probably over analysing everything. The CGI gold and the ending still sucks ass but the rest is fantastic. Martin Freeman is so good as Bilbo, he should have been in every shot.

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Well, 2001 is the only Kubrick film I've been allowed to see beyond Dr. Stranglove, so I can't judge the other ones.

I like it, though.

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Tack said:

For the record, a few of my favorite films...

The Third Man (1949)

Solaris (1972)

Metropolis (1927)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Theatrical Cut) (1977)

Blade Runner (Workprint) (1982)

Citizen Kane (1941)

Jaws (1975)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

… and I'm thirteen.

It's a question of taste, not age.

 *high fives Tack a billion times*

Good list. I remember first seeing 2001 when I was about 8. Instantly fell in love with it.

<span style=“font-weight: bold;”>The Most Handsomest Guy on OT.com</span>

Author
Time

Just curious, how many people here have seen the original Solaris?

And how many can compare it to its remake for me?

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

Tack said:

For the record, a few of my favorite films...

The Third Man (1949)

Solaris (1972)

Metropolis (1927)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Theatrical Cut) (1977)

Blade Runner (Workprint) (1982)

Citizen Kane (1941)

Jaws (1975)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

… and I'm thirteen.

It's a question of taste, not age.

Yay this guy! I'm 18 now but I've been appreciating classics since I was much younger, it's kind of annoying actually when people assume teens have bad taste.

I love all those movies by the way. Solaris is probably my least favorite though, too long. And that's not a critique I throw around often, I freaking love every minute of 2001, for example, but I find Solaris to be simply too long for its own good. The remake is much shorter, but, ultimately, much worse for entirely different reasons.

Author
Time

I personally find it interesting for its artsy techniques and some interesting discussions. To me it's like if 2001 was talky and employed black-and-white footage frequently.

The fantasies were enough to keep me intrigued.

I was wondering what the remake was like. The only movie I've seen George Clooney in was O Brother Where Art Thou, and he had a southern accent there so I can't really judge his acting. 

I have plenty of classics left to see, though.

Mainly, The Seventh Seal, The Seven Samurai/Magnificent Seven, Lady Eve, Vertigo, and Psycho, to name just a few.

I'll find time soon. 

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

ray_afraid said:

^There's no accounting for taste. I realized when he first started posing movie ratings that his barometer was screwy and that he's probably quite young. Nothin' wrong with any of that.

I'm sure twenty-six is quite young from a certain point of view. But perhaps I should bring up the fact that I am a fan of older movies, prefer them to newer movies by a very long shot, and that my opinion has nothing to do with "Duh, old movies suck"?

As for why I rated Aliens the way I did ...

I didn't like any of the Marines. They were all asinine douchebags, and I was happy to see them die.

I find it pathetic that a group of Marines -- knowing they're going up a whole goddamn hive of nasty man-killing bugs with acidic blood -- armour themselves in bulletproof vests and helmets only, leaving the rest of their bodies open to damage. I could understand it if this movie were set in the present, but it's set in the far future; am I really supposed to believe that a future civilization capable of building FTL-capable starships can't come up with battlesuits or smart armour?

I don't like how all the mystique and ambiguity of the creature from the original film is taken away by making its species nothing more than giant, stupid ants driven by instinct and nothing more.  

 Pvt. Vasquez would like a word with you. ;)

And I don't see how Hicks could be considered an douchebag.

Vasquez is too butch for my tastes. I also don't like her personality.

And yes, you're right -- Hicks wasn't really a douchebag. He was something of a non-entity, though, and beyond serving as Ripley's love interest, he added nothing to the film.

Author
Time

Tack said:

I personally find it interesting for its artsy techniques and some interesting discussions. To me it's like if 2001 was talky and employed black-and-white footage frequently.

The fantasies were enough to keep me intrigued.

I was wondering what the remake was like. The only movie I've seen George Clooney in was O Brother Where Art Thou, and he had a southern accent there so I can't really judge his acting. 

I have plenty of classics left to see, though.

Mainly, The Seventh Seal, The Seven Samurai/Magnificent Seven, Lady Eve, Vertigo, and Psycho, to name just a few.

I'll find time soon. 

 Yeah I enjoy that stuff too - I still love the movie, just wouldn't name it as one of my top favorites.

George Clooney is a fairly high quality actor, he's not the problem with the remake, he's done some great stuff (namely The Descendants, Michael Clayton, Syrianna, amongst others).

You have time to see the classics, don't worry about that. I've gotten nearly to the point where I've run out, or at least I have to look really hard now. It's fulfilling but also a little disappointing. I loved it when I was really young (like 6 or something) and I watched my first Oscars and I realized that there were a ton of amazing movies out there that I'll get to watch at some point.

The Seventh Seal and Seven Samurai are two of my favorites, Magnificent Seven is great too but not really at the same level. Lady Eve's great, check out Sullivan's Travels too if you haven't. Vertigo and Psycho are amazing, of course, my favorite Hitchcock films. I'm actually slowly working on seeing all his films (LMS The Lodger). Rear Window's up there too, make sure you see that if you haven't.

Author
Time

I've seen Sullivan's Travels. And Rear Window. Loved both of them.

From an early age, I was desensitized to the classics. I just sort of grew to like them.

All I can say is, thank the Lord for TCM.

I’m just here because I’m driving tonight.