logo Sign In

Info: Recommended Editions of Disney Animated (and Partially Animated) Features — Page 13

Author
Time
 (Edited)

From Aristocats (the first post Jungle Book film) to Beauty and the Beast, most of these films have had a full frame release on DVD.  Usually in the Gold Edition.  I've noted most of them in the first post.

If I missed any, you can check out editions here: http://www.dvdizzy.com/disneyanimatedclassics.html

I believe from Fox and the Hound on, Disney started moving back towards natively wide formats.

As far as Beauty and the Beast goes, 1.66:1 (the OAR) isn't that far off from 1.77:1.  Yes some image is lost, but not a lot.  You're talking about 3% each side.  You lose more than that in overscan.

Heck, a lot of films lose that just in the transfer process.  For example, the Jungle Book full frame version SHOULD be everything animated, but the widescreen release, while cropped at the top and bottom shows some image on the sides not present in the 4x3 release.

It's not technically pan and scan, just sloppy work.  This isn't limited to Disney, a lot of studios do it when transferring films.

I wouldn't mind seeing a screenshot comparison of the LD to the PE DVD showing how much is being lost or gained.

Dr. M

Author
Time
 (Edited)

  I know there were fullscreen releases, they're just not available to me.

 

   By the way, I just had a look at your "Make Mine Music". Good job!

 

   Now here's something someone might be able to help me with: the Brazilian R4 NTSC release of "Melody Time" was based on the R1 and has, therefore, the censored version of the "Pecos Bill" segment, missing a line in the song...

   I heard, however, that many of the European PAL discs have the Portuguese dubbing, and since they are uncut, I imagine so is their audio. Could someone make the Portuguese track available?

   A few pointers on how to convert it to NTSC would also be welcome, as I'm not very good with these things.

Author
Time

@Mazaliche - I researched a few releases of Melody Time when I was working on it.  I've never seen a Portuguese audio track.  There aren't even that many subtitle tracks outside of Spanish.

Dr. M

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Thanks for trying to help, Doctor M.

   According to a Disney discussion board in Portugal, the Portuguese edition has the Portuguese audio, and there was even a disc available on a public tracker ( but no longer seeded ) which includes English, German, Spanish and Portuguese.

   I'm not sure I can post the link over here, so I might have to keep you AT BAY , but the torrent was 4,37 GB.

 

P.S. I just got your "Melody Time". Looking forward to it.

Author
Time

Big update to the guide.  Added info on several new releases.  I'll reserve judgement on the Little Mermaid until its official released.

Changes cover: Cinderella, Lady and the Tramp, Sleeping Beauty, Sword in the Stone, Aristocats, Robin Hood, Oliver & Company and The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh.

Xerography era Blu-rays did not fare well.

As always, disagreement, comments and debate is welcome.  I'm not the final word on this and certainly not much of an expert.

Dr. M

Author
Time

TLM made it to Switzerland, and I have just visited there and had a look:

The picture looks fantastic, really the best the film has ever looked on home video, but the editing mistakes are glaring, and should be fixed.

The sound is better than the DEHT, but is not the same as the 1997 mix, voices are heard on the front speakers as well, while on the 1997 mix, they are limited to the center channel.

Overall, with the DTS cd's of the 1997 mix and the Stereo mix from the LD, some mild editing on the BD can make it the best edition.

Author
Time

dvdmike said:

Doctor M said:

...and the final product isn't always representative of what is released in other countries.  Jungle Book is the same era and uses xerography like Sword in the Stone.  I don't see the U.S. release looking much better than SitS does.


As far as the Little Mermaid audio: The first LD release of LM has Dolby surround (2 channel prologic), which would be based on the ORIGINAL Dolby theatrical mix.  IIRC, in theaters it was a sort of analog equivalent to DD 5.1.  This disc is pan and scan.

The 1998 LD contains the 5.1 digitally remaster soundtrack from the 1997 release as well as a mono and Dolby surround track.  I'm not sure if the latter two are downmixes of the '97 mix or from the '89 mix.

The first DVD is pretty much identical to the 1998 LD.  It is non-animorphic letterboxed and contains the 5.1 digitally remastered track.

Imdb claims there was 70mm 6-track original release mix. I couldn't prove it, but it's possible.

I couldn't tell you if there is much difference between the '89 and '97 mix.  It's most likely that they just reproduced the Dolby analog mix as a Digital mix because theaters were changing over.

This would be unlike the DEHT mixes where they assume you only have TV speakers and are half deaf.

With a little google-fu

 

Little Mermaid, The Spherical (Super 1.85:1) Nov 15 (USA) 6-Track Dolby Stereo Walt Disney

 

OAR blow-up. First spherically photographed Disney animated film to be blown-up to 70mm.

I'm not sure as I've never really seen this a second time...Usually the 5.1 likely used the original 4 track master used for the 1987 Dolby Stereo release, and this was probably converted to Dolby 70mm six track by splitting the mono surround and adding the baby boom enhancement as on other blowup films in throughout the 80's. (ex Batman)

VADER!? WHERE THE HELL IS MY MOCHA LATTE? -Palpy on a very bad day.
“George didn’t think there was any future in dead Han toys.”-Harrison Ford
YT channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/DamnFoolIdealisticCrusader

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Well, I got the European BD, and more importantly, I found a software that allows for frame-by-frame editing, Solveigmm.

It has a short learning curve and the result is lossless, as no encoding is involved.

So I fixed the reversed shots on "Part of That World" and now I have a 16 GB video file (Without the sound that can be added later).

Other than the opening titles and the cut instead of fade when Scuttle is introduced, what would it take to put that edition on the top of the list?

Audio wise, as I had said, Jetrellfo's DTS cd's and a LD rip of the Stereo soundtrack (I can upload a small rip with the new mix for comparison and synching reference if needed)

Author
Time

nirbateman said:

Other than the opening titles and the cut instead of fade when Scuttle is introduced, what would it take to put that edition on the top of the list?

Obviously you need to fix the editing on "Part of That World".

Currently enjoying Disney Infinity 3.0

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Oh, I thought I made it clear that I did that.

Edited the previous post to reflect that.

Solveigmm only allows me to trim the video in a very exact manner, but not much more.

It does however does what it's supposed to do without a hitch.

Author
Time

nirbateman said:

Well, I got the European BD, and more importantly, I found a software that allows for frame-by-frame editing, Solveigmm.

It has a short learning curve and the result is lossless, as no encoding is involved.

So I fixed the reversed shots on "Part of That World" and now I have a 16 GB video file (Without the sound that can be added later).

Other than the opening titles and the cut instead of fade when Scuttle is introduced, what would it take to put that edition on the top of the list?

Audio wise, as I had said, Jetrellfo's DTS cd's and a LD rip of the Stereo soundtrack (I can upload a small rip with the new mix for comparison and synching reference if needed)

As soon as I get my internet situation fixed I will make sure TLM is bumped up the "todo" list.

Author
Time

As soon as I get my internet situation fixed I will make sure TLM is bumped up the "todo" list.

Awesome, let me know if you need the video.

Author
Time

nirbateman said:

Well, I got the European BD, and more importantly, I found a software that allows for frame-by-frame editing, Solveigmm.

It has a short learning curve and the result is lossless, as no encoding is involved.

So I fixed the reversed shots on "Part of That World" and now I have a 16 GB video file (Without the sound that can be added later).

Other than the opening titles and the cut instead of fade when Scuttle is introduced, what would it take to put that edition on the top of the list?

Audio wise, as I had said, Jetrellfo's DTS cd's and a LD rip of the Stereo soundtrack (I can upload a small rip with the new mix for comparison and synching reference if needed)

Can changing the cut to Scuttle to a crossfade be easily fixed or did they remove frames?  Other than that and the new placement of "Walt Disney Presents," the only other changes that would need to reversed for a true theatrical version is:

1) Priest's knee reinstated

2) Some animation that was changed (very minor, but if you want to be nitpicky)

3) Original Walt Disney opening instead of the new one.  This can be found in its original form on the "Pocahontas" Blu-ray.

Also, is the LD stereo rip from the original 1990 LD?

Author
Time

Can changing the cut to Scuttle to a crossfade be easily fixed or did they remove frames?  Other than that and the new placement of "Walt Disney Presents," the only other changes that would need to reversed for a true theatrical version is:

1) Priest's knee reinstated

2) Some animation that was changed (very minor, but if you want to be nitpicky)

3) Original Walt Disney opening instead of the new one.  This can be found in its original form on the "Pocahontas" Blu-ray.

Also, is the LD stereo rip from the original 1990 LD?

Well, I'm not sure they removed frames, as a dub I attached from the PE fitted perfectly once I changed the opening fanfare to it.

I know of the priest's knee, but I don't know of any other animation changes, and I'm not that big of a purist when it comes to TLM since I didn't have the old VHS during my childhood.

The reversed shots did trouble me since it was a stupid mistake to make, and had to be corrected.

Adding the original fanfare is interesting, but that would mean re-encoding it so it could be merged with the rest of the film, and since the bit rate isn't constant, I'm not sure how well it would work.

The DTS from it could be very useful however, in editing soundtracks for LD rips. For example, the Diamond DTS of BATB.

As to the Stereo rip, I don't have one yet, but I would assume whoever does that would use the original LD.

I don't have the expertise to re-paint the film like other members, but I can definitely upload the fixed video if someone would like to take a crack at it.

Author
Time

nirbateman said:

Can changing the cut to Scuttle to a crossfade be easily fixed or did they remove frames?  Other than that and the new placement of "Walt Disney Presents," the only other changes that would need to reversed for a true theatrical version is:

1) Priest's knee reinstated

2) Some animation that was changed (very minor, but if you want to be nitpicky)

3) Original Walt Disney opening instead of the new one.  This can be found in its original form on the "Pocahontas" Blu-ray.

Also, is the LD stereo rip from the original 1990 LD?

Well, I'm not sure they removed frames, as a dub I attached from the PE fitted perfectly once I changed the opening fanfare to it.

I know of the priest's knee, but I don't know of any other animation changes, and I'm not that big of a purist when it comes to TLM since I didn't have the old VHS during my childhood.

The reversed shots did trouble me since it was a stupid mistake to make, and had to be corrected.

Adding the original fanfare is interesting, but that would mean re-encoding it so it could be merged with the rest of the film, and since the bit rate isn't constant, I'm not sure how well it would work.

The DTS from it could be very useful however, in editing soundtracks for LD rips. For example, the Diamond DTS of BATB.

As to the Stereo rip, I don't have one yet, but I would assume whoever does that would use the original LD.

I don't have the expertise to re-paint the film like other members, but I can definitely upload the fixed video if someone would like to take a crack at it.

I've noticed a few minor changes, only because I've been noticing them for years. For example, they smoothed out the animation of Ariel when she is climbing onto the wedding ship.  Very minor and probably not worth the effort to "fix." I think the priest's knee is worth fixing.  I also think restoring the original fanfare is worth it as well, if it can be done.  Again, I don't have much knowledge in this area, so I am not sure.

I have the original LD, but I currently don't have the equipment to rip audio.  If anyone with the right equipment wants to rip the audio, I will gladly provide my copy for use.

Author
Time

Seems there's some serious artifacts akin to edge enhancement on some of their more recent blu-ray titles in the catalog. Thoughts? Is this as bad as it looks? Keep in mind the examples have of course been enlarged to highlight the problem, but apparently it's all over the new Aladdin blu.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

I believe that the following eBay listing is the professionally-created Snow White bootleg VHS that Leonardo has: http://www.ebay.it/itm/BIANCANEVE-E-I-SETTE-NANI-VHS-WALT-DISNEY-David-Hand-/271273456204?pt=Videocassette_e_VHS&hash=item3f2928724c

Anyone with a good PAL VHS VCR want to take a crack at preserving it?

A picture is worth a thousand words. Post 102 is worth more.

I’m late to the party, but I think this is the best song. Enjoy!

—Teams Jetrell Fo 1, Jetrell Fo 2, and Jetrell Fo 3

Author
Time

I believe that's the one. But I'd never pay that much for it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Double post, because of this:

That right there is a film tear from the TLM BD (no, really). From what I seen from here, it is just for one four frames. Thoughts?

EDIT:

On the plus side, it shows that the source of the BD is film reels (I'm betting it is 70 mm).

Currently enjoying Disney Infinity 3.0

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Hello everyone,

 

I have just registered here, after reading this interesting thread! A thread containing, by the way, the most links I have ever seen to "our" discussion over at:

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=204278

:D :P Thanks for that! ;)

 

I just wanted to add a few things to the Cinderella discussion.

 

First of all, in the first post of this thread it says my Cinderella comparison contains "VHS vs 2005 DVD Screenshots". It is, however:

VHS 1997 vs. BD 2012 (Diamond)

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?p=6399775#post6399775

 

And then "Doctor M" says: "I previously argued that there is more detail in the laserdisc.  I now strongly believe those alarmist screenshots being posted are cherry picked to favor the laserdisc.  Here are my comparison screenshots:" http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Recommended-Editions-of-Disney-Animated-and-Partially-Animated-Features/post/653541/#TopicPost653541

 

To the uneducated reader that may sound like you're saying: "The BD isn't that bad." Of course I know that is NOT what you're saying... :P It's more like: "The LD isn't that good either", isn't it? So maybe some cherry picking was necessary to make the LD look good, but I can assure you there is absolutely no picking of any kinds of fruit involved in the comparison between the BD and my good old PAL VHS from 1997!

To show you what I mean, I made a second, smaller comparison with the exact shots you posted... Now look at that:

http://members.chello.nl/h.h.j.f.beens/temp/Cinderella_VHSvsBD_4.jpg

Yes, of course the BD seems sharper, but the level of detail on the VHS is unmatched! And on top of that those weird, artificial colors of the BD!... :(

 

So to conclude, until Disney releases a new, proper restoration, I really would be very interested in that restoration project you were talking about over here! :)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Welcome, Freddy2, and thank you for the input.  I hope you are cool with your screenshots being linked.  Those sort of comparisons are really impressive and extremely difficult to replicate.  (Especially when analog sources are involved.)

I've made corrections to the Cinderella entry in the first post and have reworded the recommendations.

Some of the lost detail is very much lost (e.g., the bow).  In some cases I'm not so sure.

The fairy dust looks like lost detail, but you can actually count the specks in both versions and the only real difference is that it is now smaller in diameter.  

Fattening the dust is the sort of manipulation that would have been done for home video to keep it from disappearing between scan lines of the TV.

I'm trying to be even handed until we have cells or some other source to confirm which detail is actually lost.

We are in complete agreement with the colors being badly messed with.  They are.

I have also now been more specific that the VHS and LD are the preferred format.  The screenshots you posted make it apparent the LD2DVD transfer has some issues (possibly in the LD itself) that wash out the details it is meant to be preserving.  (Without VHS vs LD screenshots, I'm not sure where the issue is.)

Whatever method you used to take those VHS screenshots would be a great way to make a VHS2DVD transfer.

I hope I am now more clear, VHS and LD are the purist source for Cinderella, period.

If you can tolerate incorrect colors and some unfortunate loss of detail, the Diamond release has amazing clarity and some additional detail that even the analog sources lack.  Which is why I say, at best, it is only 'acceptable'.

The 'acceptable' suggestion is also intended to be more accessible for those that may not be able to track down and/or play vid tapes or LDs.  In the case of Cinderella that's a problem since there are no digital home video releases that predate the restoration.  Snow White in an even worse situation since I've seen no pre-restoration home video version at all.

Dr. M

Author
Time

Welcome, Freddy2, and thank you for the input.  I hope you are cool with your screenshots being linked.  Those sort of comparisons are really impressive and extremely difficult to replicate.  (Especially when analog sources are involved.)
Thank you! And yes, of course you may link to my screenshots. In fact, I would like it even more if you all would send the link to Disney! The more they are made aware of the issues, the better.

The fairy dust looks like lost detail, but you can actually count the specks in both versions and the only real difference is that it is now smaller in diameter.
That is true for the dust on the left and right of her, but not for the part next to her head, against the sky. Over there big parts are nearly gone. Another example of the same problem can be seen in that similar shot in my original comparison, where two of the fingers of her left hand have been reduced to pointy objects.

Whatever method you used to take those VHS screenshots would be a great way to make a VHS2DVD transfer.
I'm working on it... ;)

In the case of Cinderella that's a problem since there are no digital home video releases that predate the restoration.  Snow White in an even worse situation since I've seen no pre-restoration home video version at all.
As far as I know there was also a VHS from around 1988, at least in Europe. Maybe that one would predate any restorations...

Author
Time

Freddy2 said:

 

As far as I know there was also a VHS from around 1988, at least in Europe. Maybe that one would predate any restorations...

 

There was a VHS, CLV LD and CAV LD release in the US in 1988.

I have the latter two, though the CAV edition is with someone else atm along with the rest of my collection and my player.

Dunno what use it would be in the scheme of things.  Being "stereo", the audio is prolly a remix.

I also have, and have released a cruddy encode of, the 1995 CLV release.

"Right now the coffees are doing their final work." (Airi, Masked Rider Den-o episode 1)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Doctor M, I was thinking about this last night. Have you taken in account the topless woman controversy into consideration when finding a purist version of The Rescuers? I know it's an extremely minor point, but I think it's worth pointing out. 

I know when Disney released it on Home Video for the second time, they caught the frames and recalled the VHS. I don't think the frame was in the first DVD release.