logo Sign In

Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released) — Page 348

Author
Time

CatBus said:

Also this method would only work reliably on Blu-ray and AVCHD, it may not work on MKV, and it wouldn't necessarily work on software players at all, and it would also suck when scaled down to DVD because DVD subtitles don't have the necessary color palette (or alpha) to be convincing.

This is what I was concerned about. If I convert the movie to a file to watch on such as an AppleTV, then the subtitles may not look right if they're not burned-in.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

Thank you Catbus for your reply. I realized that it was a common trait among the different mixes to be louder or have more dynamic range between them as technology progressed. I enjoy the mixes just the way they are, I have no problem turning my TV up to hear the original stereo mixes, plus the fact that those tracks are quieter is an added bonus for me as I can put on the CC while my partner is sleeping and geek out in bliss.

Cheers,

Adam

Author
Time

chyron8472 said: This is what I was concerned about. If I convert the movie to a file to watch on such as an AppleTV, then the subtitles may not look right if they're not burned-in.

If you are converting what Harmy uploads anyway, you could burn in whatever subtitles you want.

Author
Time

Harmy said:

Something I definitely want is the subs and audio to be selectable through menu, because there will be so many options that selecting them through remote only might get confusing.

Sounds good...but just to be clear, the wonderful burned-in Greedo subs are staying, right?

Author
Time

Curses!

Haha, well, it was worth a second try.  Keep up the good work Harmy.  BTW, has anyone checked if that dark spot on the opening Star Destroyer is present on the GOUT?  If I remember or have time when I get home, I might try breaking out my '06 bonus disc to check...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Chewtobacca said:

chyron8472 said: This is what I was concerned about. If I convert the movie to a file to watch on such as an AppleTV, then the subtitles may not look right if they're not burned-in.

If you are converting what Harmy uploads anyway, you could burn in whatever subtitles you want.

Not with the proper typeface.

PGS files and SUP files don't seem to play well with the software I'm using... nor most other software, from what I can see from a quick Google search. Most software seems to want you to use SRT files, and that's just time-coded text. It doesn't retain the original typeface.

Not that I'm nitpicky about any other movie with regard to this, but I am about Star Wars and Return of the Jedi.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

In all fairness Chyron, you could probably make a .ASS subtitle file that'd have a pleasing enough font, still not be burned into the video and be usable across a large number of software and hardware players.  But it'll be burned in, so no worries.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

yoda-sama said:

In all fairness Chyron, you could probably make a .ASS subtitle file that'd have a pleasing enough font, still not be burned into the video and be usable across a large number of software and hardware players.  But it'll be burned in, so no worries.

.ASS doesn't give you anything more than .SRT in this context except better positioning options.  The font can be very pleasing but still not accurate--in fact I find the theatrical subs to be harder to read than font-generated subs.  But readability and pleasing appearance are not the point.  Chyron wants theatrically accurate subs, which I don't think is unreasonable for a theatrical reconstruction.  The only way to achieve theatrical accuracy is PGS or burnt-in, and PGS doesn't work everywhere.  You can't work around this by changing the format of a text file.

You CAN get something that makes both you and Chyron happy by using multiple angles.  This path is not a dead end, unlike the path you are on right now.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, I read that Harmy said it would. I was just sort of continuing the conversation.

The issue for me really seems to be specifically with Bluray subtitles (PGS) when converting to MKV. DVD subs would work fine.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

Yeah, I read that Harmy said it would. I was just sort of continuing the conversation.

The issue for me really seems to be specifically with Bluray subtitles (PGS) when converting to MKV. DVD subs would work fine.

DVD subs would function, but they would have lots of aliasing compared to PGS, due to not enough colors/alpha to do curves and diagonals.  I've done DVD subs for one of Chewtobacca's DVD projects, and while I think they look as good as DVD subs can look, they don't really fool anyone about being original theatrical subs.  To sharp, too defined, too regular, too aliased.  Burnt-in would have been better.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

 

CatBus said:

I find the theatrical subs to be harder to read than font-generated subs.  But readability and pleasing appearance are not the point.  Chyron wants theatrically accurate subs, which I don't think is unreasonable for a theatrical reconstruction.  The only way to achieve theatrical accuracy is PGS or burnt-in, and PGS doesn't work everywhere.  You can't work around this by changing the format of a text file.

 

Ehh... I'm not so intransigent as to only accept one possible answer and be a jerk otherwise. And after reading the Project Threepio readme, it seems it would be possible (perhaps even fairly simple) to mux the "matching" subtitles into the film. If this were a DVD, it would just be a matter of encoding the film to a file while including said muxed subtitles; but this project involves PGS files, which from what I'm reading requires an AVISynth plugin to be able to properly use, and even then people still recommend using AVISynth to burn them in, which defeats the purpose of the whole idea.

I know Handbrake has a nightly build that supposedly supports PGS, but I tried that (with a different film on bluray ) and it doesn't really work.

 

I've been ripping my parents' movie library to put on their NAS, and my inability to work with Bluray subtitles led me to start using Subtitle Edit, which OCRs them and writes them to SRT.

But I agree that DVD subtitles do look jagged-y, and not as good as the theatrical burned-in subs for SW and ROTJ.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

When I remuxed 2.1 into MKV, I put the SUP files in there too. They play fine in MPC-HC both playing the AVCHD disc and the MKV file. They do take a while to kick in after seeking, but once they do, they work fine. 

Author
Time

CatBus, don't mistake my comments to Chyron as me continuing to champion soft subs for the project, Harmy's had his say so it is done.  I was just offering another option to his what-if scenario of encoding in subtitles when he converts.  .ASS can offer some impressive stuff, though for anyone picky about the theatrical look of the subtitles, then yes, burning it in from the start is the easiest all around answer.

Oh, and Harmy, seeking in 2.1 works much better than the previous versions, not sure if anyone has mentioned that yet.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:  Not with the proper typeface.

You could use Avisynth or some other program to burn in whatever typeface you like.

Author
Time

Harmy, I just wanted to exit lurk mode for just a few minutes so I can thank you (all all the others here who have had a hand in this project) for all of your work.  I've loved Star Wars since I saw ROTJ in the theater as a kid, but in the last decade or so it's become something of a love/hate relationship due to George's continued tinkering.  To be honest, Star Wars just kind of bummed me out.  Empire is my favorite film of all time, but I never had any desire to watch it (or the other two) because I just wanted the original versions. 

Over the years I followed the work of Adywan and OCP and a few others, and while I respected and was excited by their hard work, it was never more than a curiosity for me.  Then I found your project and after watching Empire and Jedi 1.0 the love was officially back.  I waited until v2.0 came out before viewing Star Wars and have been following everything you've been doing since then.  I love 2.1 and I'm very eager to see the blu-ray (mostly because I know it means you'll be starting work on Empire 2.0!).  So again, a huge thank you to you and everyone else here for returning to me something I thought was gone forever.

Author
Time

A huge thank you indeed... Harmy saved Star Wars. Thank the maker.

Author
Time

Mux in the .ass and the .ttf - use \be or \blur - you can do more than you'd think. =P

"Right now the coffees are doing their final work." (Airi, Masked Rider Den-o episode 1)

Author
Time

Hey Harmy I was curious how the rendering is coming along on the 2.5 mt2s file that your blu is going to built upon?  Keep up the great work!

Author
Time

So I've calibrated my screen the best I can, looked through the comparison pictures, and the thing that stands out the most, colorwise, is the reddish haze in the final scene. It's plainly apparent even in the comparison shots, where it is even redder than the GOUT! I've seen Mike Verta's color correction and his 35mm source, and the atmosphere is nowhere near as red as 2.1.

It's difficult to get the colors corrected from the DVD or Blu-ray (I've tried for weeks), but it is possible, especially if the movie is being corrected scene by scene.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time

yoda-sama said:

BTW, has anyone checked if that dark spot on the opening Star Destroyer is present on the GOUT?

My guess is that the dark spot anomaly was probably introduced or possibly made more visible when the sequence was recomposited. (except for the starfield, it looks like the original elements were still used) It can also be seen in the '97SE transfers but not in any original sources, if it's not visible in the original due to generation loss caused by the optical compositing or because it's not actually there at all is hard to tell.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Interesting.  Which original sources did you compare with?

Author
Time

yoda-sama said:

Interesting.  Which original sources did you compare with?

A faded 35mm scan scratched to hell and pan&scan video, to my tired eyes it isn't present. Team -1 might be able to give you a more definitive answer.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com