
- Time
- Post link
Tyrphanax said:
Thanks to this thread, I now see that all faked accents in movies are racial stereotypes with intent to offend.
Wherever you got that idea.
Tyrphanax said:
Thanks to this thread, I now see that all faked accents in movies are racial stereotypes with intent to offend.
Wherever you got that idea.
Tyrphanax said:
...I will now proceed to be pissed at Christian Bale for his obviously offensive portrayal of Americans in nearly all of his films.
I was offended by Bale's Batman voice too - it ruined the movie(s).
TV's Frink said:
Tyrphanax said:
...I will now proceed to be pissed at Christian Bale for his obviously offensive portrayal of Americans in nearly all of his films.
I was offended by Bale's Batman voice too - it ruined the movie(s).
Yup. He tried to emulate Michael Keaton's "my voice is slightly different when I'm Batman" thing. Instead, he came across like he was gargling with gravel while fighting a sinus infection. Not so much in Batman Begins, but it was way over the top in The Dark Knight.
twooffour said:
Gaffer Tape said:
EDIT: You know what? Nevermind. You're just not worth it.
But, by the way, Nien Nunb speaks an actual African language. Has that ever pulled you out of the movie? Have you ever spent serious time contemplating why there are Africans in space? Or did you just accept it?Hehe - too late!
Next time, read the post you're replying to, then maybe you won't have to get embarassed and delete your comment.
If you really feel that compelled to flatter yourself, fine. But I stand firmly by everything I wrote, and I have no reason to be embarrassed that you rambled in response to it. The only thing I'm embarrassed about is being naive enough to defend you when you first started posting here. That's something I'd be happy to facepalm over. I only deleted my comment because I realized it was useless to attempt to have a polite and intelligent conversation with someone who so richly deserves to get kicked in his pretentious e-nuts (thank you, Frinky!). But, see, now I know better, so from now on I'll no longer bother. 'Kay?
Sparkles, sunshine, and lollipops,
Gaffer Tape
There is no lingerie in space…
C3PX said: Gaffer is like that hot girl in high school that you think you have a chance with even though she is way out of your league because she is sweet and not a stuck up bitch who pretends you don’t exist… then one day you spot her making out with some skinny twerp, only on second glance you realize it is the goth girl who always sits in the back of class; at that moment it dawns on you why she is never seen hanging off the arm of any of the jocks… and you realize, damn, she really is unobtainable after all. Not that that is going to stop you from dreaming… Only in this case, Gaffer is actually a guy.
Gaffer Tape said:
If you really feel that compelled to flatter yourself, fine.
Wait, where did I flatter myself?
All I said was that you completely misread just about everything I've written in the last couple days, judging by your replies - that doesn't mean my posts were somehow terribly good.
But I stand firmly by everything I wrote, and I have no reason to be embarrassed that you rambled in response to it.
The fact that you demonstratively declare to be standing firmly and proudly by a clear misconception on your part, is what you should be embarassed about.
All I said was that the inclusion of aliens with recognizeable ethnic / national features from actual cultures on Earth, shattered suspension of disbelief by "suggesting" social commentary.
I've never insisted that it had anything to do with such characters being "bad", or "annoying" (the Neimoidians just happen to be), or that any of that was inherently "offensive".
You response above indicated that you hadn't got ANY of this, because you just couldn't be bothered.
The only thing I'm embarrassed about is being naive enough to defend you when you first started posting here.
I honestly don't even remember that.
However, if you actually "defended" something I wrote, could it be that it was because you actually found my posts valid? Because otherwise you'd be a sycophant. ;)
I only deleted my comment because I realized it was useless to attempt to have a polite and intelligent conversation
In order to even begin to have an "intelligent conversation", you need to first pay attention to what the other party is saying.
What is "useless" is contuing to reply even though you clearly can't be bothered with that.
with someone who so richly deserves to get kicked in his pretentious e-nuts (thank you, Frinky!). 'Kay?
You know it's funny, I don't recall saying anything about "kicking your stupid arrogant ass" to you, or to Frink, anywhere in this thread.
Nor do you see me preaching politeness, or getting "offended" at "respectless" treatment.
But then again, seeing as how pointing out that you haven't been paying basic attention already gets you offended, your reaction isn't a surprise.
PS: Don't "bother" addressing how inept your Nien Numb example was, just keep complaining about my "pretentiousness".
OMG, the DRAMA!!!
:D
twooffour said:
Nice fail! And I'm not even going to bother explaining why, although you will be the only one here who doesn't understand why.
TV's Frink said:
Dear Moth3r,
If I were to kick twooffour in his pretentious e-nuts, would that be considered a personal attack?
Thanks,
TVF
Dear Moth3r,
Still waiting for your reply. If it helps, I will try to include some type of on-topic response in said e-nut kicking.
Warmest Regards,
Television's Frink
TV's Frink said:
twooffour said:
Nice fail! And I'm not even going to bother explaining why, although you will be the only one here who doesn't understand why.
Actually, I can imagine a good number of reasons "why", and none of them hold water.
;)
TV's Frink said:
TV's Frink said:
Dear Moth3r,
If I were to kick twooffour in his pretentious e-nuts, would that be considered a personal attack?
Thanks,
TVFDear Moth3r,
Still waiting for your reply. If it helps, I will try to include some type of on-topic response in said e-nut kicking.
Warmest Regards,
Television's Frink
He probably still doesn't like me for demolishing his laughable posts comparing TPM to MiB, and calling him a "dunce" on that same thread (that was then), so he'll probably say no.
Having that said, if you actually COULD kick me in my e-nuts, you would've long done that instead of beating around the bush after quitting reading after the first few lines.
I'm trying to think of something else I liked in the PT to have at least one on-topic post on this page. The Utai are a good design.
The blue elephant in the room.
Bruce Spence was way cool, too :)
Star Wars was the first movie I remember seeing as a kid back in 1977, and I remember the rest of the originals from my childhood as well. Oddly enough, my experience of them goes way beyond the movies. Since I didn't have a VCR until the 1990's, I probably read the novels more than saw the movies. I also eagerly listened to the radio dramas as well, and all of those sources are kinda combined in my head.
And then in 1999 came TPM. Yippee! A Star Wars Movie! But like many of us, it wasn't the Star Wars Movie I was hoping for. I even got the books for the first couple, like I did as a kid. And if you think Jar-jar was bad on screen, try reading a page of him...
But on to what I liked.
John Williams's Score - even if there was that issue of the soundtrack for TPM having a track called the death of Qui-Jon, which got out before the movie. Still, it was great to have that type of music again.
Eye candy a plenty. This lead to problems in pacing, but it in certain moods, it is great.
Acting wise, I liked Ewan McGregor's Obi-wan, with the major exception of how dense he was with the mystery in AOTC. Ian McDiarmid was great as well, especially as the tempter in ROTS.
I think there is a quite interesting story in Anakin's tragic fall - namely his warped love. As a rather traditional Christian, I want to see it more along the lines of the way Augustine talked about the death of a loved friend in his Confessions than the probably more Buddhist conception probably behind the story here, the twin stories of Anakin's fall because of desire to save the ones he loved and his redemption through discovering his son's love is an interesting idea. The problem is that GL did so bad with the Love story that it gets in the way of this.
I thought of something I liked! Wowee!
The pods. Not the pod race or the pod racers, but the pods themselves were really cool. Great designs on each one, great sound design, and very cool idea to make them like chariots. I like how each one looked like it was built from scratch to suit the individual pilots. And the use of real world parts made them much more believable than the CGI vehicles later in the PT. I also felt they were just about the only things that looked like Star Wars. Though it would have been so much better if instead of a NASCAR like event it had been more like an illegal drag race. Also would have been better if the film didn't spend so much time focusing on the race and how great a pilot Anikin was and how he could use the Force to help him out only to latter have him accidentally fly the spaceship then accidentally fly into the big space station and accidentally fire the missiles which accidentally miss his intended targets and just by dumb-ass luck hit the one thing that blows the whole thing up. yeeesh. Why spend all that time establishing facts that aren't used when needed?
TV's Frink said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
Darth Bizarro said:
Yoda's Lightsaber! The primary reason why almost all episode 2 and 3 fanedits fall flat for me.
Boo-urns!
Yeah, that's a major fail.
I love you too.
"George, we hate you for making more Star Wars movies. Please make more Star Wars movies."
-The Internet
Darth Bizarro said:
TV's Frink said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
Darth Bizarro said:
Yoda's Lightsaber! The primary reason why almost all episode 2 and 3 fanedits fall flat for me.
Boo-urns!
Yeah, that's a major fail.
I love you too.
Sorry, my heart belongs to the sea.
What about isolated, out-of-context images from I-III? There's some good ones, stuff that is like the idealized prequel in my pre-99 brain:
TV's Frink said:
Darth Bizarro said:
TV's Frink said:
DuracellEnergizer said:
Darth Bizarro said:
Yoda's Lightsaber! The primary reason why almost all episode 2 and 3 fanedits fall flat for me.
Boo-urns!
Yeah, that's a major fail.
I love you too.
Sorry, my heart belongs to the sea.
Same story, different version.
"George, we hate you for making more Star Wars movies. Please make more Star Wars movies."
-The Internet
So I'm among the minority here that finds redemptive value in the prequels despite my disappointment with each of them and their many flaws. I've been considering TPM lately in particular. There are many juvenile moments, bad acting, the lame midichlorian excuse, and a weak story in many regards. However, I'm starting to warm up to the film, even all those things I just mentioned. It has many beautiful shots (particularly with the aristorcratic Naboo), interesting ships designs, and a fun lightsaber fight. Even more significant to me in recent viewings is that to me it does carry a Star Wars feel to it, perhaps better than the faster paced Episodes II and III. It uses real miniatures and one can easily tell the difference. The lightsabers remind me of the originals with their flicker. The Jedi actually seem to be powerful.
In fact, among all the criticisms of the film, my biggest problem with it is not what most people say. Rather than Jar Jar or intracellular symbionts, my biggest complaint is the strange pacing: it cuts from scene to scene far too quickly, yet still feels too slow. I don't mind slow films if they are cut in a similar fashion, but somehow this movie is fast and boring at the same time.
But at the end of the day, I still feel like I'm watching Star Wars when I see Episode I. That's something I like about it.
Well said. I liked the designs in Episode One myself as well.
Another thing that I always try to explain is that in all honesty I think it's the closest George ever got to what he wanted in the first place. It is really episodic, just like a movie serial. If you're a believer in the saga of Anakin Skywalker (I'm not), you really could skip this movie without any repercussions - like how you could probably walk into the Batman & Robin serials without having seen the preceding Batman one.
Another thing about it is that I always felt like it never tried to be anything more than a kids' movie. I found, despite more "serious" scenes like in the jedi temple, a rather consistent tone - more than I can say for the following two. There's an innocence I feel in it that I don't in any of the others... but that might be nostalgia goggles talking. If anyone thinks they can better explain my points give it a shot.
A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em
I actually liked most of the designs of all three of the films...the starfighters, Jango, pod racers, Republic craft etc....It was the CG creature design, battledriods, CG Stormtroopers along with poor storytelling & direction that spoiled the movies for me
J
I got all 3 "art of" books, there's some really great, evocative work in there, Mccaig's in particular. If the movie had been able to execute that stuff in a more convincing way, (and the characters would just shut up), you'd really have something. ( The teaser for attack of the clones that had no dialogue is my favorite prequel. )
Yeah, I've never had a big problem with the designs of the prequels (they weren't McQuarrie, but they passed).
Naboo was cool, Kamino was cool, Jango was cool, the blasters and ships and other stuff were all neat.
Just the execution of the films blew. Once again it comes down to writing and directing: great components (design, the most basic plot elements, et cetera), all spoiled by bad execution.
Keep Circulating the Tapes.
END OF LINE
(It hasn’t happened yet)
I actually loved episode 3. The first one was meh, mediocore, the second one was actually pretty good and decent, episode 3 is the best of all of the 6 star wars films/movies!!!!!!
Episode 3 kicked some serious ass!!!!!