logo Sign In

.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *) — Page 96

Author
Time

As far as I know, these tapes are the digital master, while LD holds analog video. So the GOUT is a professionally done re-encode from digital to digital, while a '93 LD transfer is digital converted to analog and back to digital from the same original source.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Quite so.  D1 tape is digital component video with 4:2:2 chroma.  The GOUT still wouldn't look as good as that, of course, since mpeg2 compression of a noisy image will bollocks it up with compression artefacts in some spots even with a high bitrate, but it's definitely closer to the source than anything else.

The master tape was referred to as D1 in the Widescreen Review article that discussed the creation of the 1993 audio mixes.  Surprising that they'd use that instead of the composite D2 format, which was more commonly used due to cost and lower bandwidth requirement, but I guess they wanted to do the thing properly.  D1's resolution is listed as 720 x 486, so theoretically the GOUT should reproduce all its detail; though there are reports of blurring and IVTC errors in some spots, so perhaps it wasn't really transferred to dvd as well as it could have been.  And then there's that weird discrepancy between RotJ's image detail in the PAL and NTSC dvd's, and who knows what would account for that . . .

But the 1993 master is very screwy in many ways regardless of what source it's viewed on--that much is certain.  ;)

Author
Time

Yeah, I was thinking that maybe they used the 1995 PAL master for Jedi? But then why wouldn't they use it for all the PAL GOUT DVDs? Does anyone know what tapes they used for the PAL transfers?

Author
Time

Do someone have that old Widescreen Review of the Definitive Collection LD set saved? or a link to it perhaps? You cannot access it any longer on their site.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

I believe I have the actual magazine...but I'd have to look for it. What in particular information were you looking for?

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>

Author
Time
 (Edited)

MeBeJedi said:

I believe I have the actual magazine...but I'd have to look for it. What in particular information were you looking for?

I was just curious to read it again, nothing specific. IIRC it was a quite extensive review of the set, I had a PDF file of it before, but cannot seem to find it.

You should be able to download it on their site but it doesn't seem to work: http://www.widescreenreview.com/ld_detail.php?recid=1043

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

OmegaMattman said:

Anyhooo, after glancing at the first couple of AVI files, I must say this transfer is excellent, aside from the dot-crawl issues mentioned earlier.  In fact, during some of the opening bits, I saw less loss of vertical detail than I did on GOUT...specifically, during those early close-ups on Artoo.  I wonder if this could be overlaid on GOUT to clean-up some of that detail.

I have not seen this transfer myself yet, but I'm willing to believe you. I saw this thing on the Emperor hologram in Empire, where the DC LD preservation had detail that's missing in the GOUT: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Complete-Comparison-of-Special-Edition-Visual-Changes/post/452971/#TopicPost452971 looks more like interlace pattern on those pics though, but those are the actual scanlines, they are completely gone in the GOUT-transfer. But this is actually like comparing shit vs. shit.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

mysycamore said

I have not seen this transfer myself yet, but I'm willing to believe you. I saw this thing on the Emperor hologram in Empire, where the DC LD preservation had detail that's missing in the GOUT: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Complete-Comparison-of-Special-Edition-Visual-Changes/post/452971/#TopicPost452971 looks more like interlace pattern on those pics though, but those are the actual scanlines, they are completely gone in the GOUT-transfer. But this is actually like comparing shit vs. shit.

I think I remember reading that.  And, the more I look at the X0, the more I feel like retracting my previous statement.  The detail gain is pretty negligible compared to the detail of GOUT.  Going through the hassle of combining the two video elements would be a lot of effort for something no one would ever notice.  And, most importantly, it still wouldn't solve the overall problems with Definitive and GOUT :/

Author
Time

The GOUT has a bizarre lack of detail in certain areas... for example, look at R2 in the final shot of Star Wars compared to any LD capture.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

bkev said:

The GOUT has a bizarre lack of detail in certain areas... for example, look at R2 in the final shot of Star Wars compared to any LD capture.

Damn, you're right. Always thought that shot was just the PAL LD's vs GOUT, when it's actually detail loss compared to the NTSC LD's as well. Those horizontal lines on R2 is just a blurred mess in the GOUT. Even how bad this '93 master was, it's sad that we never got SW & Empire properly transferred in '06.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time


JediTemple pre-troll behavior from the screenshot thread said:
Official "GOUT" DVD - PAL
2006 George Lucas Original Unaltered Edition
Letterbox PAL
DVD9

http://aptirrelevance.com/otscreenshots/images/resized/GOUT-PAL-r-036.jpg
Moth3r
1995 French THX PAL LDs
Anamorphic PAL
DVD5

http://aptirrelevance.com/otscreenshots/images/resized/moth3r-r-036.jpg

Just to make clearer what I was referring to.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

I'm pretty sure that is due to the higher PAL resolution. The PAL GOUT is only an upscale of the NTSC master, so the fact that the screen is from the PAL GOUT DVD doesn't really mean anything.

Author
Time

Harmy that's sadly not the case. Look at the TR47/CowClops V2, taken from the NTSC DC:
http://aptirrelevance.com/otscreenshots/images/resized/cowclops-r-036.jpg
Now, while not quite as nice as Moth3r's excellent transfer, you can still see what I'm talking about - at least, I hope.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time
 (Edited)

bkev said:


JediTemple pre-troll behavior from the screenshot thread said:

lol

Author
Time

I thought my description of it was quite clear already.

The same master:

NTSC GOUT

US Definitive Collection LD

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

OK, I see. But that's really weird. There's definitely less detail on R2 i the GOUT but look at Chewie's fur - there's definitely more detail in the GOUT there.

Author
Time

I believe that when they mastered the video for the GOUT discs, they applied a blur in the vertical direction possibly as an attempt to mask the jaggies/aliasing (which you'll notice is much worse in the non-blurred X0 files).

The GOUT video has less vertical detail than the laserdisc video. However, it has more horizontal detail because DVD has a higher bandwidth/more resolution than the laserdisc format.

It might be possible to reduce the jaggies but retain the detail using interpolation (nnedi, etc.) as an alternative to applying a simple vertical blur.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, that's exactly what I said a few posts above.

Did the X0 team ever transfer the 1995 PAL LD? That could be interesting because it has less DVNR and more horizontal resolution, so a clean X0 transfer could actually be an improvement over the GOUT.

Author
Time

What day is it today...

“I love Darth Editous and I’m not ashamed to admit it.” ~ADigitalMan

Author
Time

The X0 is only an NTSC player. I don't recall that any of us had a PAL player.

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: Sadly, I believe the prequels are beyond repair.
<span class=“Bold”>JediRandy: They’re certainly beyond any repair you’re capable of making.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>MeBeJedi: You aren’t one of us.
<span class=“Bold”>Go-Mer-Tonic: I can’t say I find that very disappointing.</span></span>

<span class=“Italics”>JediRandy: I won’t suck as much as a fan edit.</span>