logo Sign In

Complete Comparison of Special Edition Visual Changes — Page 13

Author
Time
 (Edited)

 I was talking about this:

 

The lightsaber there is not the same. The original one is skinny at first and then tapers out. The glow is different and has electrical crackly bits, and the way it joins into the hilt is different looking too (squarish and flat in 2004, but thin and rounder in the GOUT, even with its clipped white levels).

Author
Time

^^ The first image looks far more natural.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Yeah, that was actually the one who made me suspect they had recomped all lightsabers in this sequence, but I'm still not sure about them all to be honest, so you should not take what I suspected as fact, doubleofive. ;) and you picked the wrong chasm-matte pics, the 2nd and 3rd are identical, the first have a quite visible seam.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

There is no way that is the same saber. Whatever it was that was done to it, whether its the old one re-polished or a new one replaced it, or an older element re-used here, or combinations of any of them--it clearly has been visually altered in some manner. I'm gonna say its a completely different element than 1977. We know they were recomping all the other elements in those shots, and they didn't always recomp them in the same place or with the exact same element, especially since it was digital and they could do whatever they wanted. So it makes sense that if they were re-building the elements in that shot from scratch that the saber is a recomp of some kind. But as for whether that means every shot in the scene had a new saber is hard to say, I'm going by the caps here mostly. As far as I know, the seeker ball was recomped every time, and that would mean the lightsaber was as well, regardless of whether they visually changed it somehow as in this shot.

Author
Time

Here is what I mean, the two shots after this one uses a slightly better composite.

and as I stated on the last page, the remote laser color glitch is 2004 exclusive. I think this also means that the "tractor beam shaft" mattepainting is the only one left alone, am I right? Thank you Mr. Ellenshaw! ;)

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

... As far as I know, the seeker ball was recomped every time, and that would mean the lightsaber was as well, regardless of whether they visually changed it somehow as in this shot.

I'm gonna bet that it will be have to figured out shot by shot and there may not be any consistent technique where the wide shots have a new effect or the close-ups are merely re-mattes, for example.  

Would the inconsistencies of the work (for instance the shots where the snow speeder cockpit is translucent and other shots where it is fixed) be attributed by differences in ILM employees assigned to work on the shots?  

Author
Time

I looked at both saber scenes frame-by-frame stacked on top. While the SE lacks the crackling, the blade is always the same basic shape as the original. I believe the crackling and odd blade shape like that is something coming from the optical compositing, which they didn't recreate when they redid it digitally. I'm not saying nothing was done to it, but then my descriptions say as much. All of the shots of Luke are like that (there's only 4 or 5). The saber battle I did not go through, but may have to grab some examples from there.

The wide shots seem to have all new blades, just like every laser blast is brand new.

1997 has the white laser blast in color? The hard drive I had my 97SE on is dumb, can anyone grab that for me?

Still confused on the matte (it's early). So I have one that wasn't changed, one that was, and I'm missing the other?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I see the matte thing. There's also a slight camera move in the SE. Adding it, and I'm going to post some more lightsaber shots here.

EDIT: Going through the Vader/Obi-wan duel now. Lightsabers definitely recomped, definitely original elements (same flicker/flaws). Also every saber clash flash is redone from the original element. More good stuff here.

EDIT2: First part is going up. Check it out!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Here you go, 1997 SE

and I really don't think you should begin to cover these color issues, because they are everywhere! and you know that, and then you will never be done with this. ;) But that's just my opinion, I just mentioned it earlier to demonstrate how color can switch from scene to scene in these DVD transfers, someone basically sat and played with the color values when making these, so having those color issues on this list is just wrong IMO when they aren't changes per se, there's also a few color glitches on some optical effects in the GOUT, but nothing like the '04 DVD fiasco. Here's a few more subtle color issues, some will not notice them at first glance, but when you're familiar with the colortiming of these films, this really distract you.

a few moments later, the correct green coloring lights on R2 is back

this one, maybe isn't that subtle, but it's one of those before and after shots, just a second apart from each other

And so on... this is how it goes on in the whole film. Some are subtle but when it happens when a lightsaber are on screen, it doesn't get so subtle anymore. That's why you have blue lightsaber turned green, blue lightsaber turned purple and blue lightsaber turned white etc. at least that's my theory. But that's just the color issue, you could basically write a book on all the horrible problems with these DVD's, everything went wrong.

About that chasm-matte, you have three shots of the chasm, the first shot of the chasm is from a slightly different angle, but the same painting is used on all three, that's why the mattepainting didn't lign up so good on that first one as on the other two. Sorry for not explaining it better the first time around. ;) Nice eye, doubleofive! didn't notice that little pan, it must be related to that matte problem.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Different colors between scenes I won't cover, but that remote blows my mind. They rebuilt the entire shot from the original elements, but somehow LOST THE COLOR for the DVD? Crazy!

And that chasm matte having motion, I actually paused the video and swore out loud. I literally added 70 images to the already huge ANH album in the last two days. And there's still more to add! I'm eager to check on the ESB saber flashes.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Nice job, doubleofive! Those saber impact flashes in the battle looks horrible in the DVD, if you look carefully, you can see they only have the core left, and a very dull core that is, what happened to the outer glow? they don't even look like flashes, more like a light-green mess.

Also, all those Vader vs. Obi-Wan changes are 2004 alterations, I compared the '97 transfer with your finds and the flashes are identical to the original film in that one.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Thank god, I knew I wasn't fuckin crazy for saying the SE sabers were recomps, lol.

The camera move on the chasm matte is a good find. And Msycamore, I have never noticed those colour inconsistencies (but maybe because the only time I watch the 2004 SE is to take frame grabs to show how shitty it is). I'm loving the continued finds. Just when you think there couldn't be more differences, bam, right in the face.

005: I'm not sure I agree with you that the sabers are always recomps of the same elements. If you look at the caps I reposted--they clearly are NOT the same shape as you say. I know that's only one frame, but its the telltale clue that something about the whole element has been changed. Nothing about them is similar. But you are probably correct when you say the flicker is the same. Here is my rationale to reconcile this: the ANH sabers were largely in-camera. Unlike ESB and ROTJ, the sabers in the first film used reflective blue-screen-like material to produce the glow in-camera. In post, they realised it wasn't enough so they added the coloured feather-glow. So, the glowing cores aren't an effect--they are right on the original raw camera negative. So when you start layering on other elements and re-rotoscoping them, you still have the same flickering cores, because that was actually photographed in real life. My  2 cents.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

zombie84 said:

Here is my rationale to reconcile this: the ANH sabers were largely in-camera. Unlike ESB and ROTJ, the sabers in the first film used reflective blue-screen-like material to produce the glow in-camera. In post, they realised it wasn't enough so they added the coloured feather-glow. So, the glowing cores aren't an effect--they are right on the original raw camera negative. So when you start layering on other elements and re-rotoscoping them, you still have the same flickering cores, because that was actually photographed in real life. My  2 cents.

That is exactly what's going on. You actually see the rotating material underneath in many scenes, more so in the SE.

I know the Falcon saber and battle saber was photographed that way, but what about the cantina saber and Ben's hut?

zombie84 said:

And Msycamore, I have never noticed those colour inconsistencies (but maybe because the only time I watch the 2004 SE is to take frame grabs to show how shitty it is).

That's what I did. ;) But seriously, those are everywhere. They really had fun when they did this DVD set.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Oh gracious, the flashes are 2004 changes? Cripes, this is getting out of hand!

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Yes, they are. That scene didn't go through any alterations in '97. Here's comparison pic 149 as it's always nice to see it for yourself.

1997 SE (aspect ratio isn't entirely correct on this one, manually adjusted)

If you want to cover more of those saber-flashes, you also have the later wide shots of that battle etc.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

Wow, so the sabers weren't recomped in 1997. They DID put some effort into 2004!

Yeah, I'll get the rest of the battle later.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

No, they weren't, but I wouldn't call the '04 alterations an effort. ;)

Edit: Here you have an example of the original sabers in the '97SE

To me it looks like they just altered Obi-Wan's saber in 2004 not Vader's, I may be wrong though...

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com

Author
Time

It kills me when people say that fixing the lightsabers is one of the things they like about the 2004 version.  To me the original blades were nearly perfect, with only a few minor technical glitches popping up occasionally.  The '04 blades look stupid and weird, they're clearly completely re-done in some shots, and don't have the same feel or effect to them at all.

In addition to the blades being altered visually, the sound effects during the duel are also completely screwed up.  When Ben activates his saber, the low end of the ignition sound is cranked up beyond reason, and there's a huge amount of extra hissing and junk noise added in every time they clash, which sounds completely wrong.  It's ridiculous.

I swear, that Matthew Wood guy who did the 2004 mix must be a tone-deaf buffoon to think any of that is even remotely acceptable.  Either that, or he gets off on destroying original sound design and "improving" it beyond recognition.  But then, he is responsible for the repulsive voice of General Grievous in RotS, so I suppose the level of bad aural taste is no surprise.

Author
Time

hairy_hen said:

It kills me when people say that fixing the lightsabers is one of the things they like about the 2004 version.  To me the original blades were nearly perfect, with only a few minor technical glitches popping up occasionally.  The '04 blades look stupid and weird, they're clearly completely re-done in some shots, and don't have the same feel or effect to them at all.

I agree.  The original blades have a different feel to them.  It's amazing how much these films have been changed.

Author
Time

Hey, people, what do you think about this "lightning" (sorry, I have no idea how to call it properly in English, simply that animated "thing" on R2 right above Luke's hand). Is it re-worked or does it belong to the same category as the four-eyed stormtrooper ?

 

frame 32494

Author
Time

Here is another example of new hologram effect (top is 2004, bottom is GOUT)

 

frame 50412

Author
Time

Yes, that one above is a great example of the redone holograms, no scanlines and a different angle on the projection light.

You can see those animated little sparks a little better on the JSC.

As doubleofive said, they probably recomped it along with the hologram which is clearly a recomp. Nice little find, we need more people to help spot these little things.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans—now or in the future—to restore the earlier versions. 

Sincerely, Lynne Hale publicity@lucasfilm.com