logo Sign In

The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread — Page 167

Author
Time

Handzzz said:

And no need for "darksaber" to kill a jedi. HK-47 knows it :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPeI4mX8Nus

A very astute analysis on how to pick apart Jedi... Yeah... darksabers suck. Both of them but even the Hutt Darksaber was a step up from this newest retcon travesty.

           Ca Rogues

                          The impossible is what Rogues do best...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Rogue Leader said:

Anyway, I would be glad to go head to head with you on this and if you're saying Mandalorian back story only goes back 7 years... well... That already tells me how much you know about their background and history. However, to an extent you're correct, their legend springs from some guy in an awesome costume in ESB. However, if you're gonna say that then it's good to keep in mind that everything about the Mandalore is added on anyway and only 7-years recent (which is also false btw), thus why should we care about any of this... Then why should we care about Star Wars at all? Afterall, it's ALL made up as well and added on over the decades anyway. 

But that's the thing... We do care, and to imply that we shouldn't as much or at all because the simplicity of it's origin misses the point entirely. Why even be interested in Star Wars at all then? That's for the individual person to answer for themselves as I have my own reasons as I'm sure we all do.... However, my point was that Lucas doesn't know what the hell he's doing with his "toy box" anymore and thus creates situations and issues that are contradictory to things that were established previously. Yes, it's made up, it's ALL made up... Yet, I care cos it's a interesting story and all I really wish is that the consistency and quality of the universe is cared for at the level it should be.

Further more to mock the Mandalore by interjecting your dull Klingon comparison is unwarranted. They're different sci-fi and cultures with some similar ideals but only to an extent. I'd say Mandos would tear those ridge headed freaks a new one and won't act like dirty drunken sailors in a bad pirate movie doing so (but hey, that's me). But to say that they're the same/"hardly ground breaking sci-fi", it's been done etc etc etc... Again, the point is missed. EVERYTHING in Star Wars has been done before, it borrows from everything else and it's a different spin on stuff. It's how it's arranged that presented to us that has drawn a lot of to it as fans and even now.

However, it's the presentation NOW, that I have the most problems with... It's inconsistent, contradictory, and concepts to be done for profit rather than the integrity of the story or characters and so I don't buy those novels and/or games any longer. In fact I haven't bought anything that would profit LFL in a few years at least.

As for those notable authors you mentioned (I personally love Zahn and Stackpole's work...) Yeah? And? Is it wrong for these creative people to make money? I mean it's their living right? What sets them apart from Lucas however is that these authors are hardly the gajillionare power house Lucas is. They've not been corrupted by absolute power and not been surrounding themselves with yes men who are afraid to tell them "Hey, dude... that's like... retarded". Thus there is a certain integrity in their work that is based of struggle and meaning to make us more interested in each character (and expanded new characters, Mara Jade, Corran Horn, the Solo kids... etc) as opposed to the absolute pile of nothing that's in something like Episode 1 which had no meaning or struggle we could be drawn into or care about.

 

 Hmmm... so because Lucas actually runs his own creation "Star Wars" and doesn't hand it off to other people to run for him, and he directed the PT when he would have made just as much money barely even being involved, that proves he doesn't care and is only about money, so he should hand off control to other people. Brilliant.

And the money Lucas (the creator) makes is somehow corrupt and immoral, but the money EU authors make (and you can slap "Star Wars" on the cover of just about anything and make it a best seller) is pure and honorable because they're great artists with integrity.

There's this odd mixing of what-is-liked and what-is-morally-good. When you liked the EU it was apparently not "done for profit" and now that you don't like it as much it is just a big money grab.

You don't like the PT or the CWS so they're just pipelines to line Lucas's evil pockets, but "Battlestar: Clone Medics" and "The Hand of Thrawn" were art for arts sake and worthy of our patronage. I'm sure Lucas, Zahn, and the publishers didn't care at all that "Heir to the Empire" sold more copies than God. They were all about integrity back then. To bad they sold out later.

And perhaps I haven't tracked down the right mid-90s comic back issue, or the right RPG supplement, or Abel Pena's blog, or wookiepedia article that somehow explains how the convuluted ret-con full history of the Mandalorian Space-vikings is so wondeful. I probably should have done extensive research before being bored to tears by Traviss's novels. Shame on me.

I should make me a flowchart of how Boba Fett was Jaster Mereel but wans't and how being a Mandalorian is a race, and a concept, and a clothing style, and how Flynn Shyssha in the old Marvel comics made perfect sense until big Evil Lucas came aong  and ruined the flawless continuity.

OR I can roll that the EU is a muddled mess and always has been and parts of it are just as bad or worse than the PTs lowest moments (Crytals Star, Glove of Vader, Swarm War), and not dwell on these inconsistencies as I enjoy the product the creator of Star Wars is actually delivering to me on TV.

 

Author
Time

More mac ideas to action. this time space hangars and docks to replace the death star at the end of ROTS..

the resized image cant do justice of the detail of the original canvas so i put some close ups of the original rez :)

-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TheBoost said:

Rogue Leader said:

 

Anyway, I would be glad to go head to head with you on this and if you're saying Mandalorian back story only goes back 7 years... well... That already tells me how much you know about their background and history. However, to an extent you're correct, their legend springs from some guy in an awesome costume in ESB. However, if you're gonna say that then it's good to keep in mind that everything about the Mandalore is added on anyway and only 7-years recent (which is also false btw), thus why should we care about any of this... Then why should we care about Star Wars at all? Afterall, it's ALL made up as well and added on over the decades anyway. 

But that's the thing... We do care, and to imply that we shouldn't as much or at all because the simplicity of it's origin misses the point entirely. Why even be interested in Star Wars at all then? That's for the individual person to answer for themselves as I have my own reasons as I'm sure we all do.... However, my point was that Lucas doesn't know what the hell he's doing with his "toy box" anymore and thus creates situations and issues that are contradictory to things that were established previously. Yes, it's made up, it's ALL made up... Yet, I care cos it's a interesting story and all I really wish is that the consistency and quality of the universe is cared for at the level it should be.

Further more to mock the Mandalore by interjecting your dull Klingon comparison is unwarranted. They're different sci-fi and cultures with some similar ideals but only to an extent. I'd say Mandos would tear those ridge headed freaks a new one and won't act like dirty drunken sailors in a bad pirate movie doing so (but hey, that's me). But to say that they're the same/"hardly ground breaking sci-fi", it's been done etc etc etc... Again, the point is missed. EVERYTHING in Star Wars has been done before, it borrows from everything else and it's a different spin on stuff. It's how it's arranged that presented to us that has drawn a lot of to it as fans and even now.

However, it's the presentation NOW, that I have the most problems with... It's inconsistent, contradictory, and concepts to be done for profit rather than the integrity of the story or characters and so I don't buy those novels and/or games any longer. In fact I haven't bought anything that would profit LFL in a few years at least.

As for those notable authors you mentioned (I personally love Zahn and Stackpole's work...) Yeah? And? Is it wrong for these creative people to make money? I mean it's their living right? What sets them apart from Lucas however is that these authors are hardly the gajillionare power house Lucas is. They've not been corrupted by absolute power and not been surrounding themselves with yes men who are afraid to tell them "Hey, dude... that's like... retarded". Thus there is a certain integrity in their work that is based of struggle and meaning to make us more interested in each character (and expanded new characters, Mara Jade, Corran Horn, the Solo kids... etc) as opposed to the absolute pile of nothing that's in something like Episode 1 which had no meaning or struggle we could be drawn into or care about.

 

 Hmmm... so because Lucas actually runs his own creation "Star Wars" and doesn't hand it off to other people to run for him, and he directed the PT when he would have made just as much money barely even being involved, that proves he doesn't care and is only about money, so he should hand off control to other people. Brilliant.

And the money Lucas (the creator) makes is somehow corrupt and immoral, but the money EU authors make (and you can slap "Star Wars" on the cover of just about anything and make it a best seller) is pure and honorable because they're great artists with integrity.

There's this odd mixing of what-is-liked and what-is-morally-good. When you liked the EU it was apparently not "done for profit" and now that you don't like it as much it is just a big money grab.

You don't like the PT or the CWS so they're just pipelines to line Lucas's evil pockets, but "Battlestar: Clone Medics" and "The Hand of Thrawn" were art for arts sake and worthy of our patronage. I'm sure Lucas, Zahn, and the publishers didn't care at all that "Heir to the Empire" sold more copies than God. They were all about integrity back then. To bad they sold out later.

And perhaps I haven't tracked down the right mid-90s comic back issue, or the right RPG supplement, or Abel Pena's blog, or wookiepedia article that somehow explains how the convuluted ret-con full history of the Mandalorian Space-vikings is so wondeful. I probably should have done extensive research before being bored to tears by Traviss's novels. Shame on me.

I should make me a flowchart of how Boba Fett was Jaster Mereel but wans't and how being a Mandalorian is a race, and a concept, and a clothing style, and how Flynn Shyssha in the old Marvel comics made perfect sense until big Evil Lucas came aong  and ruined the flawless continuity.

OR I can roll that the EU is a muddled mess and always has been and parts of it are just as bad or worse than the PTs lowest moments (Crytals Star, Glove of Vader, Swarm War), and not dwell on these inconsistencies as I enjoy the product the creator of Star Wars is actually delivering to me on TV.

 

I have my own opinions due to my sources within LFL along with tons of other information which I have no time or inclination to put here. I honestly I don't care whether you agree or not as they are only just my opinions based from information I've acquired over the years. As most of it is hearsay from people within LFL you wouldn't believe me anyway. Furthermore, this is not the place or the forum to do so.

Make all the flow charts you like but this forum was not meant for this odd push for rebuttable of what's honorable or not concerning Lucas, LFL, and the EU. There are TONS of EU stuff I DON'T like but there are also things in which I do and each can be argued endlessly. You want to continue this then PM me but subjecting everyone else to this is unfair to everyone here that want to discuss how to improve the prequels.

           Ca Rogues

                          The impossible is what Rogues do best...

Author
Time

Just to bring this up. been watchin the force unleashed 2 trailer and cant help but think what if geonosis battle was done at night. Would that feel more like star wars?

Author
Time

DuTwan said:

Just to bring this up. been watchin the force unleashed 2 trailer and cant help but think what if geonosis battle was done at night. Would that feel more like star wars?

 I don't know if it would feel more like star wars...but it sounds cool...  ;)

SSWR’s YouTube channel

Attack of the Clones: Alternate Timeline Edit Thread:
https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/SSWRs-Attack-of-the-Clones-Alternate-Timeline-Edit/id/66888

Author
Time

vaderios said:

More mac ideas to action. this time space hangars and docks to replace the death star at the end of ROTS..

-Angel

I liked the shipyards with stardestroyers better, but it's not bad. :)

Rogue Leader said:

A very astute analysis on how to pick apart Jedi... Yeah... darksabers suck. Both of them but even the Hutt Darksaber was a step up from this newest retcon travesty.

What a crap was that... I read accidentally when I was a kid. It was shocking...

Author
Time

Handzzz said:

vaderios said:

More mac ideas to action. this time space hangars and docks to replace the death star at the end of ROTS..

-Angel

I liked the shipyards with stardestroyers better, but it's not bad. :)

Ah! that?

Well just proposing :D

 

-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time
 (Edited)

vaderios said:

Well just proposing :D

 

-Angel

I accept!

I suggest we keep my last name.  Let's face it, Olie is a well known name that opens certain doors in life, as you will soon find out.  Shall we set a date?

By the way, what's up with your sig?  It looks like she kills with her armpit odor.  I hope that doesn't represent your feelings on deodorant, because this relationship could be over before it started.

Hmm...maybe we should just live together first?

Author
Time

Wow, if some of Ralph McQuarrie's ideas could be re-imagined like this from Vaderios:

As was said recently the PT was poor because McQuarrie was not involved, not even as a consultant, the OT's look was from his mind.

 

J

Author
Time

Ric Olie said:

By the way, what's up with your sig?  It looks like she kills with her armpit odor.  I hope that doesn't represent your feelings on deodorant, because this relationship could be over before it started.

My sig is just fine as you can see ;)

 

Thanks jaitea! :D

 

-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Wouldnt it be better, easier and more "symbolic", to have just the original shot of the star destroyer, darth vader going next to the emperor, and then looking simply at Coruscant, or maybe just a nice space background (echoing the ESB ending)?

Author
Time

sans_fi said:

Wouldnt it be better, easier and more "symbolic", to have just the original shot of the star destroyer, darth vader going next to the emperor, and then looking simply at Coruscant, or maybe just a nice space background (echoing the ESB ending)?

I think JasonN went that way. He put Coruscant instead of the Death star..

I still want something better, dificultier and less symbolic as we have to see some of the beginning of the empire..


-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time

vaderios said:

I think JasonN went that way. He put Coruscant instead of the Death star..

You are correct.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

fishmanlee said:

TV's Frink said:

vaderios said:

I think JasonN went that way. He put Coruscant instead of the Death star..

You are correct.

 the correct quote is: http://starwars.com/games/playnow/soundboards/?sb=b4dpak6dve

but i have one question....WHY!?

Because in that scene, the Death Star is a lame attempt to tie ROTS to SW.  If there was a few months time between the two movies, fine, but 20 years pass before SW.  Lucas even tries to jokingly (I think) address the "construction delays" in the ROTS commentary.

That was my long way of saying "it was lame."  Do you think it works, or would you suggest something different to replace the DS?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

i thought it worked i mean seeing as they had from between ROTJ and the end ANH to rebuild the thing AND the imperial senate was dissolved by that time.

But i do think it should have looked less completed than it did in the ROTS DVD

John Williams score to Return of the Jedi Remastered/Remixed:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/JOHN-WILLIAMS-Star-Wars-Episode-VI-Return-of-the-Jedi-Remastered-Edition/topic/14606/page/1/

Author
Time

vaderios said:

Handzzz said:

vaderios said:

More mac ideas to action. this time space hangars and docks to replace the death star at the end of ROTS..

-Angel

I liked the shipyards with stardestroyers better, but it's not bad. :)

Ah! that?

Well just proposing :D

 

-Angel

That looks like Kuat Drive Yards... Very awesome graphic.

           Ca Rogues

                          The impossible is what Rogues do best...

Author
Time
 (Edited)

vaderios said:

sans_fi said:

Wouldnt it be better, easier and more "symbolic", to have just the original shot of the star destroyer, darth vader going next to the emperor, and then looking simply at Coruscant, or maybe just a nice space background (echoing the ESB ending)?

I think JasonN went that way. He put Coruscant instead of the Death star..

I still want something better, dificultier and less symbolic as we have to see some of the beginning of the empire..


-Angel

Yes, that's why I prefer the picture of the shipyards. It ties well the prequels with the OT. Maybe some Victory destroyers in the distance...

http://www.piett.org/images/vsd01.jpg like in this pics.

with early tie fighters like this: http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080526192421/starwars/images/d/da/TIEVanguard-CCG.png

Author
Time
 (Edited)

But we never see "victory class star destroyers".. in star wars (EU here)

Isnt the Jedi starfighters the early Tie fighters? (audibly and only we can make the connection)

Why would make sense to put them in the shot?

 

-Angel

–>Artwork<–**

Author
Time

vaderios said:

But we never see "victory class star destroyers".. in star wars (EU here)

Isnt the Jedi starfighters the early Tie fighters? (audibly and only we can make the connection)

Why would make sense to put them in the shot?

 

-Angel

The Jedi starfighter line was purchased from Kuat Drive Yards by Sienar Fleet Systems. Thus their original triangular shape shifted into moving hexagonal panels and the central TIE shaped cockpit of the Actis Eta-2 Jedi Interceptor. Once Sienar Fleet purchased the line then this was turned into the TIE series of starfighters.

In previously established EU prior to the PT, Victory-class star destroyers were prevalent during the Clone Wars. General Jan Dondonna who gave the briefing on Yavin IV prior to the first Death Star assault was a Victory-Class Star Destroyer Captain during the Clone Wars.

           Ca Rogues

                          The impossible is what Rogues do best...

Author
Time

wow, fishmanlee. I posted in your "remastered" thread  about your trolling in other peoples threads and what do you do? you straight away post another one of your so called remastered tracks in another thread. You are just self promoting to get higher view counts on Youtube. And when people advise you to start learning about audio editing instead of just ripping off other peoples work before posting even more links you just ignore the advice and post a new link to a horrendously mixed video.

I'm not going to even bother trying to help you any more as you are just a troll.

ANH:REVISITED
ESB:REVISITED

DONATIONS TOWARDS MATERIALS FOR THE REVISITED SAGA