logo Sign In

Help: looking for... "EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE" Crawl?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Where can I obtain a good quality copy of the ANH crawl including “EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE” from 1981? I know the 2004 DVD has it, but it seems to run faster than my degraded VHS recording of USA Network from 1993 or 1994.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

bkev has failed you... my apologies!

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

It wasn't the crawl I (and ADM, and Adywan) slowed down, but the receding Star/Wars logo before it. I don't know about any changes to crawl speed.

DE

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I just checked the 2004 DVD more closely, and noticed that the starfield is different, too. Since I'm planning to make a DVD with both crawls selectable (using dark_jedi's fixed GOUT as the main movie), along with other features, anything sourced from the DVD won't work. I have video sourced from a laserdisc of the crawl, but the quality doesn't even come close to the rest of the movie, so it would look very much out of place spliced in.

Does anyone know of a good source for the original 1981 ANH crawl that would fit right in? If not, I'll look into trying to recreate it.

Author
Time

Thing about the stars is its the overall brightness that changes that. I don't think they re-created the crawl for '04... did they? It's possible.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

Ady, doesn't your AVCHD have the standard 'Episode IV' crawl, without any alterations?  It looked that way to me.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

As evidenced by the screenshots above, despite using the Episode 4 A New Hope crawl, the special edition star field is the same as the GOUT, which is from '77.  So they just composited the newer crawl onto the original star field.  Except that the stars are somewhat dim in comparison to how they should look, for some reason.

Author
Time

@someperson -  I will try to dig out my laserdisc transfer and upload the crawl for you. (It may take a while before I have the time to get around to it, though.)

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time

@Moth3r: Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I was recently given an LD rip from a friend. Overall, I think it looks OK, but I have a slight problem with it.

http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/3402/vlcsnap2009102721h55m15.png

Does anyone know how to get rid of that red haze?

Author
Time

It seems that the starfield used in '77 was replaced in '81. But then in 1997, the original starfield was used again.

Also, looking at screenshot 1:

http://aptirrelevance.com/otscreenshots/screenshots.php?shot=1

The unaltered dvd's have the moon on the left only half visible like the 2004 versions while every pre special edition ANH has the moon visible in full. Why is that? Does anybody know why the moon looks the same from 2004 and 1977 but not 1981-1995?

And is there any reason to leave the Look transfer up on that page? It looks makedly worse than all the others. 

Take back the trilogy. Execute Order '77

http://www.youtube.com/user/Knightmessenger

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Knightmessenger said:


The unaltered dvd's have the moon on the left only half visible like the 2004 versions while every pre special edition ANH has the moon visible in full. Why is that? Does anybody know why the moon looks the same from 2004 and 1977 but not 1981-1995?


It appears that the 1981 edit also caused other changes to the beginning of the movie (probably up to the first cut after the star destroyer flies by, as someone already stated on this forum somewhere that that is where the new film was spliced in for the 1981 reissue in theaters). The moon is different, the starfield is different, and the blue haze on Tatooine is different. These changes were reverted in 1997 with the SE. For this reason, and for the sake of consistancy in my project, I am considering taking the crawl from the 1997 SE if it doesn't have the speed problems of the 2004 DVD. The only problem is that I do not have the 1997 SE in any format. How can I get it?

Author
Time

Yeah, you've got it.

And I still say the best source (assuming you want the 1977/1997/2004 starfield, and not the 1981-1995 starfield) would be Adywan's AVCHD edition.  It doesn't have the timing changes that the Revisited crawl does, but it does fix the timing problems caused by the 2004 transfer.  (Honestly, does anyone have any idea how the hell that happened?)

Author
Time

So you no longer want the crawl from my LD transfer? I ripped it, but never got around to uploading it (my PM to you is still unread).

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
 (Edited)

So let me get this straight.  When they added the A NEW HOPE title in 81, they redid the whole intro including the stars (or just the static stars at the beginning), but when they went to make the SE they went to the original negative and ADDED the A NEW HOPE title again?

Weird.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Moth3r said:


So you no longer want the crawl from my LD transfer? I ripped it, but never got around to uploading it (my PM to you is still unread).


I thought about it today, and I've decided that I'll use an LD transfer if I can get a good enough version. If it ends up being too obvious next to dark_jedi's edited GOUT, I'll settle for the 1997 SE or a fixed 2004 DVD.

So yes, I still want your crawl.

Author
Time

someperson said:

 


So yes, I still want your crawl.

 

Check your PMs.

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time

I just finished rendering out a 720x480 h.264 mp4 (7500 kbps) version of Adywan's AVCHD opening crawl and first shot (since you'd have to replace the first shot of the GOUT as well, as the starfields wouldn't match exactly regardless of whether you're using the 1997/2004 version or the 1981-1995 version), with no sound, if you're interested.  I didn't notice until after the fact, but it's true 24fps, instead of DVD-standard 23.976fps - I don't know how big of an issue that would be.

But it does, in fact, use the 1977/1997/2004 starfield, the "STAR WARS" logo recedes at the proper speed, and the crawl starts at the same time it has since 1981 (unlike the 1977 and Adywan's Revisited version, which start at a slightly earlier musical cue).  So it is 100% accurate to the 1997/2004 version - if you're a stickler for authenticity and would prefer the 1981 version, go for Moth3r's (which, quality-wise, would match the GOUT better anyway), but Adywan's looks fantastic, and actually matches the original 1977 version more closely with the (obvious) exception of the "EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE" subtitle.

If you're (or anyone else is) interested, send me a PM and I'll Rapidshare it or something.  With Adywan's permission, of course.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Moth3r said:


Check your PMs.

Thank you. It's about as noisy as I expected, but there's more yellow ghosting around the letters than I was hoping for. I'll see what I can do with it, but given my lack of knowledge about Avisynth, I really don't know what I'm doing. I'm trying to figure it out.

ChainsawAsh said:


I just finished rendering out a 720x480 h.264 mp4 (7500 kbps) version of Adywan's AVCHD opening crawl and first shot (since you'd have to replace the first shot of the GOUT as well, as the starfields wouldn't match exactly regardless of whether you're using the 1997/2004 version or the 1981-1995 version), with no sound, if you're interested.

Well, I'm hoping to use the more authentic 1981 version, but if I can't get Moth3r's video, which is by far the best LD rip I have here, to look good enough with post processing, then I'll use what you have. So, yes, I would appreciate it if you would upload what you have.

Author
Time

Ok, here's the best I've been able to get after post-processing Moth3r's video tonight in VirtualDub:

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/8435/vlcsnap2009102921h08m01.png

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/5715/vlcsnap2009102921h02m31.png

I'm still working on it. For these shots, I didn't use Avisynth at all. If anyone has any suggestions on how I can make it better, please tell me. I am mostly concerned with the loss of stars in the shot. For comparison, here's an original, unprocessed frame:

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/1410/vlcsnap2009102918h43m29.png

Author
Time

I have tried this exact project before.  I've never found an acceptable version of the crawl.  After looking closely at various sources, I noticed that Moth3r's PAL version was cropped on the sides compared to all of the NTSC LD transfers I've seen.  I had been waiting for the X0 to be released, but that's obviously not possible now.

If I had some gum, I’d chew a hole into the sun…

Author
Time

It looks too artificially processed. Sometimes less is more.

I also think the glow on the text lends it character.