- Time
- Post link
I was wondering if there are major physical differences between NTSC and PAL discs. Since the signal is encoded onto the disc, the player needn't do any actual signal coding/decoding, just read it off the disc and output it. .
This is really thee biggest misconception about laserdisc, that the video signal is somehow sitting on the disc in an easy to access (composite) format and is just opened and output with not much else going on. As mentioned in the previous post, what is actually on the laserdisc is very different. It is a heavily encoded FM signal that has no immediate correlation to composite video at all.
That is why a laserdisc player is so chock full of circuitry, and a big part of why they are so expensive and why they vary so much in playback quality. If it was as easy as just read signal and send it to the composite output, then the image quality from all players would be much the same - the huge differences in quality of output between laserdisc players is testament to the difficulty of decoding the signal cleanly and getting it to the outputs intact. They are a very different beast to any other sort of video player in existence.
A lot of NTSC players will in fact playback a PAL disc as if it was NTSC, but of course they process the signal as NTSC, so you just get a total mess in black and white, with no sync - nothing that is salvageable.
It is a cool idea, but one that won't fly - retrofitting a different laser assembly into an existing PAL player and improving its output circuitry is a more likely to succeed proposition.